Literature DB >> 24214503

Competing responses and the processing of irrelevant information.

M H Hodge1.   

Abstract

A number of studies have shown that performance of identification and discrimination tasks is detrimentally affected by irrelevant information, yet other studies have failed to find such decrements. It is suggested that these contradictory findings depend on whether S must make difficult discriminations among the relevant stimuli, the irrelevant stimuli, or between the relevant and irrelevant stimuli. The role of irrelevant information in these tasks is to enhance or amplify the competihg responses engendered by the difficult discriminations. Irrelevant information enhances competing responses by increasing the information processing requirements of a task. The results of various studies of irrelevant information seem to be in good agreement with the assertions.

Year:  1973        PMID: 24214503     DOI: 10.3758/BF03198080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  10 in total

1.  INFORMATION REDUCTION IN THE ANALYSIS OF SEQUENTIAL TASKS.

Authors:  M I POSNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  EFFECT OF IRRELEVANT INFORMATION ON A COMPLEX AUDITORY-DISCRIMINATION TASK.

Authors:  W E MONTAGUE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-03

3.  S-R COMPATIBILITY AND INFORMATION REDUCTION.

Authors:  P M FITTS; I BIEDERMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-04

4.  DISCRIMINABILITY AND PREFERENCE FOR ATTRIBUTES IN FREE AND CONSTRAINED CLASSIFICATION.

Authors:  S IMAI; W R GARNER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-06

5.  The influence of irrelevant information upon complex visual discrimination.

Authors:  M H HODGE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-01

6.  Information processing behavior: the role of irrelevant stimulus information.

Authors:  R E MORIN; B FORRIN; W ARCHER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1961-01

7.  Identification of visual patterns as a function of information load.

Authors:  E J ARCHER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-11

8.  The similarity paradox in human learning; a resolution.

Authors:  C E OSGOOD
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1949-05       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 9.  Selective attention.

Authors:  H Egeth
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Effects of stimulus complexity and restrictive responses.

Authors:  I L Goldstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-01
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  The effect of correlated linguistic dimensions on speeded classification of visually presented trigrams.

Authors:  J H Flowers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1974-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.