Literature DB >> 24213923

Effects of incapacitant spray deployed in the restraint and arrest of detainees in the Metropolitan Police Service area, London, UK: a prospective study.

J Jason Payne-James1, Graham Smith, Elizabeth Rivers, Sarah O'Rourke, Margaret Stark, Nick Sutcliffe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the United Kingdom (UK) police restraint and control of detainees is undertaken by assorted means. Two types of incapacitant spray (IS) are approved by the UK Home Office for use: CS (o-chlorobenzylidine malononitrile, dissolved in an organic solvent--methyl iso-butyl ketone and pelargonic acid vanillyamide (PAVA). The aim of this study was to document the effects of incapacitant sprays, by symptom assessment and medical examination, within a few hours of deployment.
METHODS: A detailed proforma was produced to explore the nature of the arrest, the nature of exposure to the incapacitant spray, the type of incapacitant spray, the symptoms experienced and the medical findings.
RESULTS: 99 proformas were completed. 74 % were completed by detainees and 26 % were completed by police officers. 88 % were exposed to CS spray, the remainder to PAVA spray. The mean time of assessment after exposure was 2.8 ± 2.33 h (mean ± SD). The most frequent sites of IS contact were the face and scalp (n = 78), and exposure to the left and right eyes (n = 32). The most common symptoms were: painful eyes (n = 68); red eyes (n = 58); runny nose (n = 59); lacrimation (n = 55); nasal discomfort (n = 52); skin irritation (n = 49); and skin burning (n = 45). The most common medical findings were: conjunctival erythema (n = 34); skin erythema (n = 21); and rhinorrhea (n = 20).
CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms and signs of exposure to IS lasted longer than was expected (a mean of 2.8 h). Approximately 30 % of those exposed had ocular effects and 20 % had skin effects. The findings of this study will enable the guidelines on the expected effects and duration of symptoms resulting from exposure to incapacitant sprays to be reviewed and suggestions for their management to be refined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24213923     DOI: 10.1007/s12024-013-9494-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol        ISSN: 1547-769X            Impact factor:   2.007


  16 in total

1.  Is CS gas dangerous? Current evidence suggests not but unanswered questions remain.

Authors:  F T Fraunfelder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-19

2.  Cutaneous burns from CS incapacitant spray.

Authors:  R D Southward
Journal:  Med Sci Law       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.266

3.  The health impact of crowd-control agents.

Authors:  E Weir
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Severe cutaneous reaction to CS gas.

Authors:  S Varma; P J Holt
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.470

5.  Short-term and long-term physical effects of exposure to CS spray.

Authors:  Y G Karagama; J R Newton; C J R Newbegin
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Health and safety in policing: lessons from the regulation of CS sprays in the UK.

Authors:  Brian Rappert
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Prevention of CS "tear gas" eye and skin effects and active decontamination with Diphoterine: preliminary studies in 5 French Gendarmes.

Authors:  Bernard Viala; Joël Blomet; Laurence Mathieu; Alan H Hall
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 8.  CS gas--completely safe? A burn case report and literature review.

Authors:  Yuvraj Agrawal; Daniel Thornton; Alan Phipps
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 9.  Management of the effects of exposure to tear gas.

Authors:  Pierre-Nicolas Carron; Bertrand Yersin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-19

10.  CS exposure--clinical effects and management.

Authors:  E Worthington; P A Nee
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  Trends in less-lethal use of force techniques by police services within England and Wales: 2007-2011.

Authors:  J Jason Payne-James; E Rivers; Peter Green; Atholl Johnston
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 2.  Exposure to the riot control agent CS and potential health effects: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Yiannis Dimitroglou; George Rachiotis; Christos Hadjichristodoulou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Police custody health care: a review of health morbidity, models of care and innovations within police custody in the UK, with international comparisons.

Authors:  Iain G McKinnon; Stuart Dm Thomas; Heather L Noga; Jane Senior
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-09-15

Review 4.  Health impacts of chemical irritants used for crowd control: a systematic review of the injuries and deaths caused by tear gas and pepper spray.

Authors:  Rohini J Haar; Vincent Iacopino; Nikhil Ranadive; Sheri D Weiser; Madhavi Dandu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.