Literature DB >> 24213641

Assembly errors cause false tandem duplicate regions in the chicken (Gallus gallus) genome sequence.

Qu Zhang1, Niclas Backström.   

Abstract

The complexity of eukaryote genomes makes assembly errors inevitable in the process of constructing reference genomes. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) could provide an efficient way to validate previously assembled genomes. Here, we exploited NGS data to interrogate the chicken reference genome and identified 35 pairs of nearly identical regions with >99.5 % sequence similarity and a median size of 109 kb. Several lines of evidence, including read depth, the composition of junction sequences, and sequence similarity, suggest that these regions present genome assembly errors and should be excluded from forthcoming genomic studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24213641     DOI: 10.1007/s00412-013-0443-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  11 in total

1.  BLAT--the BLAST-like alignment tool.

Authors:  W James Kent
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Recent segmental duplications in the human genome.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Bailey; Zhiping Gu; Royden A Clark; Knut Reinert; Rhea V Samonte; Stuart Schwartz; Mark D Adams; Eugene W Myers; Peter W Li; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Beware of mis-assembled genomes.

Authors:  Steven L Salzberg; James A Yorke
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Sensitive and accurate detection of copy number variants using read depth of coverage.

Authors:  Seungtai Yoon; Zhenyu Xuan; Vladimir Makarov; Kenny Ye; Jonathan Sebat
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication.

Authors:  Carl-Johan Rubin; Michael C Zody; Jonas Eriksson; Jennifer R S Meadows; Ellen Sherwood; Matthew T Webster; Lin Jiang; Max Ingman; Ted Sharpe; Sojeong Ka; Finn Hallböök; Francois Besnier; Orjan Carlborg; Bertrand Bed'hom; Michèle Tixier-Boichard; Per Jensen; Paul Siegel; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Leif Andersson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Detection and correction of false segmental duplications caused by genome mis-assembly.

Authors:  David R Kelley; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Genome-wide detection of segmental duplications and potential assembly errors in the human genome sequence.

Authors:  Joseph Cheung; Xavier Estivill; Razi Khaja; Jeffrey R MacDonald; Ken Lau; Lap-Chee Tsui; Stephen W Scherer
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Ensembl 2013.

Authors:  Paul Flicek; Ikhlak Ahmed; M Ridwan Amode; Daniel Barrell; Kathryn Beal; Simon Brent; Denise Carvalho-Silva; Peter Clapham; Guy Coates; Susan Fairley; Stephen Fitzgerald; Laurent Gil; Carlos García-Girón; Leo Gordon; Thibaut Hourlier; Sarah Hunt; Thomas Juettemann; Andreas K Kähäri; Stephen Keenan; Monika Komorowska; Eugene Kulesha; Ian Longden; Thomas Maurel; William M McLaren; Matthieu Muffato; Rishi Nag; Bert Overduin; Miguel Pignatelli; Bethan Pritchard; Emily Pritchard; Harpreet Singh Riat; Graham R S Ritchie; Magali Ruffier; Michael Schuster; Daniel Sheppard; Daniel Sobral; Kieron Taylor; Anja Thormann; Stephen Trevanion; Simon White; Steven P Wilder; Bronwen L Aken; Ewan Birney; Fiona Cunningham; Ian Dunham; Jennifer Harrow; Javier Herrero; Tim J P Hubbard; Nathan Johnson; Rhoda Kinsella; Anne Parker; Giulietta Spudich; Andy Yates; Amonida Zadissa; Stephen M J Searle
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Genome assembly forensics: finding the elusive mis-assembly.

Authors:  Adam M Phillippy; Michael C Schatz; Mihai Pop
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  7 in total

1.  A New Chicken Genome Assembly Provides Insight into Avian Genome Structure.

Authors:  Wesley C Warren; LaDeana W Hillier; Chad Tomlinson; Patrick Minx; Milinn Kremitzki; Tina Graves; Chris Markovic; Nathan Bouk; Kim D Pruitt; Francoise Thibaud-Nissen; Valerie Schneider; Tamer A Mansour; C Titus Brown; Aleksey Zimin; Rachel Hawken; Mitch Abrahamsen; Alexis B Pyrkosz; Mireille Morisson; Valerie Fillon; Alain Vignal; William Chow; Kerstin Howe; Janet E Fulton; Marcia M Miller; Peter Lovell; Claudio V Mello; Morgan Wirthlin; Andrew S Mason; Richard Kuo; David W Burt; Jerry B Dodgson; Hans H Cheng
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.154

2.  Comparative analyses of the major royal jelly protein gene cluster in three Apis species with long amplicon sequencing.

Authors:  Sophie Helbing; H Michael G Lattorff; Robin F A Moritz; Anja Buttstedt
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.458

3.  Evolution and multiple origins of zona pellucida genes in vertebrates.

Authors:  Jin-Mei Feng; Hai-Feng Tian; Qiao-Mu Hu; Yan Meng; Han-Bing Xiao
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.422

4.  Identification of Low-Confidence Regions in the Pig Reference Genome (Sscrofa10.2).

Authors:  Amanda Warr; Christelle Robert; David Hume; Alan L Archibald; Nader Deeb; Mick Watson
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Deep landscape update of dispersed and tandem repeats in the genome model of the red jungle fowl, Gallus gallus, using a series of de novo investigating tools.

Authors:  Sébastien Guizard; Benoît Piégu; Peter Arensburger; Florian Guillou; Yves Bigot
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Comparative analyses across cattle genders and breeds reveal the pitfalls caused by false positive and lineage-differential copy number variations.

Authors:  Yang Zhou; Yuri T Utsunomiya; Lingyang Xu; El Hamidi Abdel Hay; Derek M Bickhart; Tad S Sonstegard; Curtis P Van Tassell; Jose Fernando Garcia; George E Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Rapid Increase in Genome Size as a Consequence of Transposable Element Hyperactivity in Wood-White (Leptidea) Butterflies.

Authors:  Venkat Talla; Alexander Suh; Faheema Kalsoom; Vlad Dinca; Roger Vila; Magne Friberg; Christer Wiklund; Niclas Backström
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.416

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.