Literature DB >> 24212156

Applying the Social Ecological Model to evaluate a demonstration colorectal cancer screening program in Louisiana.

Henry J Nuss, Donna L Williams, Jennifer Hayden, Colleen R Huard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lack of health insurance is correlated with noncompliance in colorectal cancer screening. Louisiana ranks 48th among all states in residents with health insurance. This paper describes initial results of Louisiana's first statewide colorectal cancer screening program.
METHODS: The program enhanced screening capacity of state hospitals by providing fecal immunochemical tests (FITs), colonoscopes, and funded patient navigators. The Social Ecological Model (SEM) was used as the framework for the program.
RESULTS: Patient navigators distributed 975 FITs to adults 50 to 64 years (21% men, 78% women).The overall return rate was 66%. There was no association among return rates, race, or gender. Participants who were previously screened (10.7%) were more likely to return their FIT. DISCUSSION: The combination of patient navigation and providing patients with an easy-to-use CRC screening option proved to be an effective method that potential colorectal cancer screening programs can deploy in similar populations of un- and under-insured adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 24212156     DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved        ISSN: 1049-2089


  7 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review on US-based community health navigator (CHN) interventions for cancer screening promotion--comparing community- versus clinic-based navigator models.

Authors:  Su-I Hou; Kiersten Roberson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Key considerations in designing a patient navigation program for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Amy DeGroff; Kisha Coa; Kerry Grace Morrissey; Elizabeth Rohan; Beth Slotman
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2013-12-19

3.  Rationale and design of Mi-CARE: The mile square colorectal cancer screening, awareness and referral and education project.

Authors:  Joanna Buscemi; Yazmin San Miguel; Lisa Tussing-Humphreys; Elizabeth A Watts; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Karriem Watson; Robert A Winn; Kameron L Matthews; Yamile Molina
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Reducing Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Disparities: Performance and Outcomes of a Screening Colonoscopy Program in South Carolina.

Authors:  Sudha Xirasagar; Yi-Jhen Li; James B Burch; Virginie G Daguisé; Thomas G Hurley; James R Hébert
Journal:  Adv Public Health       Date:  2014

5.  Home testing for COVID-19 and other virus outbreaks: The complex system of translating to communities.

Authors:  Victoria Lyon; Cynthia LeRouge; Ann Fruhling; Matthew Thompson
Journal:  Health Syst (Basingstoke)       Date:  2021-07-26

6.  Cervical cancer: barriers to screening in the Somali community in Minnesota.

Authors:  Rahel G Ghebre; Barrett Sewali; Sirad Osman; Amira Adawe; Hai T Nguyen; Kolawole S Okuyemi; Anne Joseph
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-06

Review 7.  Screening and vaccination as determined by the Social Ecological Model and the Theory of Triadic Influence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anayawa Nyambe; Guido Van Hal; Jarl K Kampen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.