Literature DB >> 24212056

Interactions between visual and semantic processing during object recognition revealed by modulatory effects of age of acquisition.

Uzma Urooj1, Piers L Cornelissen2, Michael I G Simpson3, Katherine L Wheat4, Will Woods5, Laura Barca6, Andrew W Ellis7.   

Abstract

The age of acquisition (AoA) of objects and their names is a powerful determinant of processing speed in adulthood, with early-acquired objects being recognized and named faster than late-acquired objects. Previous research using fMRI (Ellis et al., 2006. Traces of vocabulary acquisition in the brain: evidence from covert object naming. NeuroImage 33, 958-968) found that AoA modulated the strength of BOLD responses in both occipital and left anterior temporal cortex during object naming. We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to explore in more detail the nature of the influence of AoA on activity in those two regions. Covert object naming recruited a network within the left hemisphere that is familiar from previous research, including visual, left occipito-temporal, anterior temporal and inferior frontal regions. Region of interest (ROI) analyses found that occipital cortex generated a rapid evoked response (~75-200 ms at 0-40 Hz) that peaked at 95 ms but was not modulated by AoA. That response was followed by a complex of later occipital responses that extended from ~300 to 850 ms and were stronger to early- than late-acquired items from ~325 to 675 ms at 10-20 Hz in the induced rather than the evoked component. Left anterior temporal cortex showed an evoked response that occurred significantly later than the first occipital response (~100-400 ms at 0-10 Hz with a peak at 191 ms) and was stronger to early- than late-acquired items from ~100 to 300 ms at 2-12 Hz. A later anterior temporal response from ~550 to 1050 ms at 5-20 Hz was not modulated by AoA. The results indicate that the initial analysis of object forms in visual cortex is not influenced by AoA. A fastforward sweep of activation from occipital and left anterior temporal cortex then results in stronger activation of semantic representations for early- than late-acquired objects. Top-down re-activation of occipital cortex by semantic representations is then greater for early than late acquired objects resulting in delayed modulation of the visual response.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Age of acquisition; Beta band; Evoked; Induced; MEG; Magnetoencephalography; Object naming; Object recognition; Semantics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24212056     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

1.  Task-dependent activity and connectivity predict episodic memory network-based responses to brain stimulation in healthy aging.

Authors:  Dídac Vidal-Piñeiro; Pablo Martin-Trias; Eider M Arenaza-Urquijo; Roser Sala-Llonch; Imma C Clemente; Isaias Mena-Sánchez; Núria Bargalló; Carles Falcón; Álvaro Pascual-Leone; David Bartrés-Faz
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Objective ages of acquisition for 3300+ simplified Chinese characters.

Authors:  Zhenguang G Cai; Shuting Huang; Zebo Xu; Nan Zhao
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06-22

3.  Dynamic information processing states revealed through neurocognitive models of object semantics.

Authors:  Alex Clarke
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  Oscillatory Dynamics Supporting Semantic Cognition: MEG Evidence for the Contribution of the Anterior Temporal Lobe Hub and Modality-Specific Spokes.

Authors:  Giovanna Mollo; Piers L Cornelissen; Rebecca E Millman; Andrew W Ellis; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Context-dependent lexical ambiguity resolution: MEG evidence for the time-course of activity in left inferior frontal gyrus and posterior middle temporal gyrus.

Authors:  Giovanna Mollo; Elizabeth Jefferies; Piers Cornelissen; Silvia P Gennari
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Dynamic semantic cognition: Characterising coherent and controlled conceptual retrieval through time using magnetoencephalography and chronometric transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Catarina Teige; Giovanna Mollo; Rebecca Millman; Nicola Savill; Jonathan Smallwood; Piers L Cornelissen; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Dissociations in semantic cognition: Oscillatory evidence for opposing effects of semantic control and type of semantic relation in anterior and posterior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Catarina Teige; Piers L Cornelissen; Giovanna Mollo; Tirso Rene Del Jesus Gonzalez Alam; Kristofor McCarty; Jonathan Smallwood; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Task modulation of spatiotemporal dynamics in semantic brain networks: An EEG/MEG study.

Authors:  Setareh Rahimi; Seyedeh-Rezvan Farahibozorg; Rebecca Jackson; Olaf Hauk
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Tracking the time course of multi-word noun phrase production with ERPs or on when (and why) cat is faster than the big cat.

Authors:  Audrey Bürki; Marina Laganaro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-01

10.  Age of acquisition and naming performance in Frisian-Dutch bilingual speakers with dementia.

Authors:  Wencke S Veenstra; Mark Huisman; Nick Miller
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.