Literature DB >> 24211863

Evaluation of a thermosensitive atelocollagen punctal plug treatment for dry eye disease.

Takashi Kojima1, Yukihiro Matsumoto1, Osama M A Ibrahim1, Tais Hitomi Wakamatsu1, Murat Dogru2, Kazuo Tsubota1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a thermosensitive atelocollagen punctal plug in the treatment of dry eye disease.
DESIGN: Prospective observational case series.
METHODS: The thermosensitive atelocollagen punctal plug was warmed at 37 C, 39 C, 41 C, and 43 C to evaluate the appropriate temperature and time for solidification. Dry eye patients were divided into 2 groups according to the preparation method of the atelocollagen punctal plug. In the conventional implantation group, atelocollagen gel was kept at room temperature for 15 minutes before implantation (27 eyes of 14 patients). In the preheating group, atelocollagen was warmed at 41 C for 8 minutes before implantation (23 eyes of 13 dry eye patients). Strip meniscometry, vital stainings, tear film break-up time (BUT), and symptom scores were evaluated before and 1 month after plug implantation.
RESULTS: In vitro experiments revealed that heating at 41 C for 8 minutes was sufficient to solidify the gel. The mean fluorescein score in the conventional implantation group significantly improved after treatment (before, 3.5 ± 2.3 points; after, 2.5 ± 0.9 points, P < .05). In the preheating group, the mean fluorescein score (before, 3.7 ± 1.7 points; after, 1.5 ± 1.2 points), strip meniscometry (before, 0.6 ± 0.7 mm; after, 1.1 ± 0.3 mm), BUT (before, 3.2 ± 0.7 seconds; after, 4.8 ± 1.0 seconds), and visual analog scale scores (before, 6.6 ± 1.5 points; after, 4.1 ± 0.9 points) significantly improved after treatment (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: The thermosensitive atelocollagen punctal plug was effective for dry eye treatment. The preheating method was found to be useful to strengthen the efficacy of the thermosensitive atelocollagen punctal plug.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24211863     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  6 in total

Review 1.  Punctal occlusion for dry eye syndrome.

Authors:  Ann-Margret Ervin; Andrew Law; Andrew D Pucker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-26

2.  A thermo-responsive protein treatment for dry eyes.

Authors:  Wan Wang; Aarti Jashnani; Suhaas R Aluri; Joshua A Gustafson; Pang-Yu Hsueh; Frances Yarber; Robert L McKown; Gordon W Laurie; Sarah F Hamm-Alvarez; J Andrew MacKay
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 3.  A New Perspective on Dry Eye Classification: Proposal by the Asia Dry Eye Society.

Authors:  Kazuo Tsubota; Norihiko Yokoi; Hitoshi Watanabe; Murat Dogru; Takashi Kojima; Masakazu Yamada; Shigeru Kinoshita; Hyo-Myung Kim; Hung-Won Tchah; Joon Young Hyon; Kyung Chul Yoon; Kyoung Yul Seo; Xuguang Sun; Wei Chen; Lingyi Liang; Mingwu Li; Louis Tong; Fung-Rong Hu; Vilavun Puangsricharern; Ruben Lim-Bon-Siong; Then Kong Yong; Zuguo Liu; Jun Shimazaki
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.152

4.  Dynamic culture of a thermosensitive collagen hydrogel as an extracellular matrix improves the construction of tissue-engineered peripheral nerve.

Authors:  Lanfeng Huang; Rui Li; Wanguo Liu; Jin Dai; Zhenwu Du; Xiaonan Wang; Jianchao Ma; Jinsong Zhao
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 5.  Advanced drug delivery and targeting technologies for the ocular diseases.

Authors:  Jaleh Barar; Ayuob Aghanejad; Marziyeh Fathi; Yadollah Omidi
Journal:  Bioimpacts       Date:  2016-03-30

6.  Feasibility of Strip Meniscometry for Tear Volume Evaluation in Lacrimal Passage Obstruction.

Authors:  Ikubun Osawa; Yuri Esaka; Takashi Kojima; Cem Simsek; Haruka Kudo; Murat Dogru
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.