Literature DB >> 24211749

The effects of cell compressibility, motility and contact inhibition on the growth of tumor cell clusters using the Cellular Potts Model.

Jonathan F Li1, John Lowengrub2.   

Abstract

There are numerous biological examples where genes associated with migratory ability of cells also confer the cells with an increased fitness even though these genes may not have any known effect on the cell mitosis rates. Here, we provide insight into these observations by analyzing the effects of cell migration, compression, and contact inhibition on the growth of tumor cell clusters using the Cellular Potts Model (CPM) in a monolayer geometry. This is a follow-up of a previous study (Thalhauser et al. 2010) in which a Moran-type model was used to study the interaction of cell proliferation, migratory potential and death on the emergence of invasive phenotypes. Here, we extend the study to include the effects of cell size and shape. In particular, we investigate the interplay between cell motility and compressibility within the CPM and find that the CPM predicts that increased cell motility leads to smaller cells. This is an artifact in the CPM. An analysis of the CPM reveals an explicit inverse-relationship between the cell stiffness and motility parameters. We use this relationship to compensate for motility-induced changes in cell size in the CPM so that in the corrected CPM, cell size is independent of the cell motility. We find that subject to comparable levels of compression, clusters of motile cells grow faster than clusters of less motile cells, in qualitative agreement with biological observations and our previous study. Increasing compression tends to reduce growth rates. Contact inhibition penalizes clumped cells by halting their growth and gives motile cells an even greater advantage. Finally, our model predicts cell size distributions that are consistent with those observed in clusters of neuroblastoma cells cultured in low and high density conditions.
© 2013 Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell fitness; Cellular Potts Model; Cell–cell interactions; Computational method; Tumor growth

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24211749      PMCID: PMC3946864          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  71 in total

1.  'Go or grow': the key to the emergence of invasion in tumour progression?

Authors:  H Hatzikirou; D Basanta; M Simon; K Schaller; A Deutsch
Journal:  Math Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  A cell-based model exhibiting branching and anastomosis during tumor-induced angiogenesis.

Authors:  Amy L Bauer; Trachette L Jackson; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Dissecting cancer through mathematics: from the cell to the animal model.

Authors:  Helen M Byrne
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Genomic analysis of metastasis reveals an essential role for RhoC.

Authors:  E A Clark; T R Golub; E S Lander; R O Hynes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Nonlinear modelling of cancer: bridging the gap between cells and tumours.

Authors:  J S Lowengrub; H B Frieboes; F Jin; Y-L Chuang; X Li; P Macklin; S M Wise; V Cristini
Journal:  Nonlinearity       Date:  2010

Review 6.  FERM control of FAK function: implications for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Ssang-Taek Lim; David Mikolon; Dwayne G Stupack; David D Schlaepfer
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Modeling of self-organized avascular tumor growth with a hybrid cellular automaton.

Authors:  Sabine Dormann; Andreas Deutsch
Journal:  In Silico Biol       Date:  2002

8.  Computer simulations of cell sorting due to differential adhesion.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Gilberto L Thomas; Maciej Swat; Abbas Shirinifard; James A Glazier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The forces behind cell movement.

Authors:  Revathi Ananthakrishnan; Allen Ehrlicher
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 6.580

10.  E-Cadherin-dependent growth suppression is mediated by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27(KIP1).

Authors:  B St Croix; C Sheehan; J W Rak; V A Flørenes; J M Slingerland; R S Kerbel
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-07-27       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  14 in total

1.  A Mechanistic Collective Cell Model for Epithelial Colony Growth and Contact Inhibition.

Authors:  Sebastian Aland; Haralambos Hatzikirou; John Lowengrub; Axel Voigt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Spatio-temporal morphology changes in and quenching effects on the 2D spreading dynamics of cell colonies in both plain and methylcellulose-containing culture media.

Authors:  N E Muzzio; M A Pasquale; M A C Huergo; A E Bolzán; P H González; A J Arvia
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.365

Review 3.  Mechanisms of environmental chemicals that enable the cancer hallmark of evasion of growth suppression.

Authors:  Rita Nahta; Fahd Al-Mulla; Rabeah Al-Temaimi; Amedeo Amedei; Rafaela Andrade-Vieira; Sarah N Bay; Dustin G Brown; Gloria M Calaf; Robert C Castellino; Karine A Cohen-Solal; Annamaria Colacci; Nichola Cruickshanks; Paul Dent; Riccardo Di Fiore; Stefano Forte; Gary S Goldberg; Roslida A Hamid; Harini Krishnan; Dale W Laird; Ahmed Lasfar; Paola A Marignani; Lorenzo Memeo; Chiara Mondello; Christian C Naus; Richard Ponce-Cusi; Jayadev Raju; Debasish Roy; Rabindra Roy; Elizabeth P Ryan; Hosni K Salem; A Ivana Scovassi; Neetu Singh; Monica Vaccari; Renza Vento; Jan Vondráček; Mark Wade; Jordan Woodrick; William H Bisson
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Bridging the gap between single-cell migration and collective dynamics.

Authors:  Florian Thüroff; Andriy Goychuk; Matthias Reiter; Erwin Frey
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Supracellular organization confers directionality and mechanical potency to migrating pairs of cardiopharyngeal progenitor cells.

Authors:  Yelena Y Bernadskaya; Haicen Yue; Lionel Christiaen; Alex Mogilner; Calina Copos
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  The front and rear of collective cell migration.

Authors:  Roberto Mayor; Sandrine Etienne-Manneville
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Cell-scale biophysical determinants of cell competition in epithelia.

Authors:  Daniel Gradeci; Anna Bove; Giulia Vallardi; Alan R Lowe; Shiladitya Banerjee; Guillaume Charras
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Lattice-based model of ductal carcinoma in situ suggests rules for breast cancer progression to an invasive state.

Authors:  Eline Boghaert; Derek C Radisky; Celeste M Nelson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Collective motion of cells crawling on a substrate: roles of cell shape and contact inhibition.

Authors:  Simon K Schnyder; John J Molina; Yuki Tanaka; Ryoichi Yamamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Proteolytic and non-proteolytic regulation of collective cell invasion: tuning by ECM density and organization.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar; Aastha Kapoor; Sejal Desai; Mandar M Inamdar; Shamik Sen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.