Literature DB >> 24211599

Outcome of metastasectomy for urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study in Japan.

Takashige Abe1, Hiroshi Kitamura2, Wataru Obara3, Nagahide Matsumura4, Taiji Tsukamoto2, Tomoaki Fujioka3, Isao Hara4, Sachiyo Murai5, Nobuo Shinohara5, Katsuya Nonomura5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined prognostic factors associated with prolonged survival after metastasectomy for urothelial carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42 patients who underwent resection of urothelial carcinoma metastases with curative intent at 4 Japanese university hospitals were included in analysis. Of the patients 41 of 42 underwent systemic chemotherapy before and/or after metastasectomy. Overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The relationship between clinical characteristics and survival was analyzed using the log rank test.
RESULTS: Metastasectomy included lymph node dissection in 20 cases, pulmonary resection in 12, pelvic exenteration in 3, resection of local recurrence in 2, resection of subcutaneous metastasis in 2, liver resection in 1 and other in 2. Median overall survival was 29 months (IQR 19-80) from the initiation of treatment for metastases and 26 months (IQR 11-90) from metastasectomy. The overall 5-year survival rate after metastasectomy was 31%. On univariate analysis patients treated with metastasectomy for a solitary lung or solitary lymph node metastasis had significantly longer survival than the others who underwent metastasectomy (81 vs 19 months, log rank test p = 0.0296).
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term cancer control could be achieved in a subgroup of patients who undergo metastasectomy, especially those with a solitary lung or solitary lymph node metastasis.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carcinoma; lymph nodes; neoplasm metastasis; urinary bladder; urothelium

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24211599     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  Bladder cancer: oligometastases and imaging.

Authors:  Laura S Mertens; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  [When is surgical resection of the primary tumor indicated in metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and what is the scientific rationale?]

Authors:  J Ellinger; S Hauser; H Kübler; S C Müller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Lack of Effectiveness of Postchemotherapy Lymphadenectomy in Bladder Cancer Patients with Clinical Evidence of Metastatic Pelvic or Retroperitoneal Lymph Nodes Only: A Propensity Score-based Analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Necchi; Luigi Mariani; Salvatore Lo Vullo; Evan Y Yu; Michael E Woods; Yu-Ning Wong; Lauren C Harshman; Ajjaj Alva; Cora N Sternberg; Aristotelis Bamias; Petros Grivas; Vadim S Koshkin; Florian Roghmann; Jakub Dobruch; Bernie J Eigl; Lucia Nappi; Matthew I Milowsky; Guenter Niegisch; Sumanta K Pal; Ugo De Giorgi; Federica Recine; Ulka Vaishampayan; Dominik D Berthold; Daniel W Bowles; Jack Baniel; Christine Theodore; Sylvain Ladoire; Sandy Srinivas; Neeraj Agarwal; Simon Crabb; Srikala Sridhar; Ali-Reza Golshayan; Carsten Ohlmann; Evanguelos Xylinas; Thomas Powles; Johnathan E Rosenberg; Joaquim Bellmunt; Bas van Rhijn; Matthew D Galsky; Kees Hendricksen
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2017-06-03

4.  The Role of Surgery in Metastatic Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mohammad Abufaraj; Guido Dalbagni; Siamak Daneshmand; Simon Horenblas; Ashish M Kamat; Ryu Kanzaki; Alexandre R Zlotta; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Validation of major prognostic models for metastatic urothelial carcinoma using a multi-institutional cohort of the real world.

Authors:  Satoru Taguchi; Tohru Nakagawa; Yukari Uemura; Akihiko Matsumoto; Yasushi Nagase; Taketo Kawai; Yoshinori Tanaka; Kanae Yoshida; Sachi Yamamoto; Yutaka Enomoto; Yorito Nose; Toshikazu Sato; Akira Ishikawa; Tetsuya Fujimura; Hiroshi Fukuhara; Haruki Kume; Yukio Homma
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  [When is surgical treatment indicated in metastatic urothelial carcinoma and what is the scientific rationale?]

Authors:  C Niedworok; H Rübben
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Upper tract urothelial carcinoma topical issue 2016: treatment of metastatic cancer.

Authors:  M N Pham; A B Apolo; M De Santis; M D Galsky; B C Leibovich; L L Pisters; A O Siefker-Radtke; G Sonpavde; G D Steinberg; C N Sternberg; S T Tagawa; A Z Weizer; M E Woods; M I Milowsky
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Metastasectomy in older adults with urothelial carcinoma: Population-based analysis of use and outcomes.

Authors:  Bishoy M Faltas; Renee L Gennarelli; Elena Elkin; Daniel P Nguyen; Jim Hu; Scott T Tagawa
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Perspective on cytoreduction and metastasis-directed therapy in node positive and metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Karel Decaestecker; Valérie Fonteyne; Willem Oosterlinck
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-12

10.  Prognostic value of site-specific metastases and therapeutic roles of surgery for patients with metastatic bladder cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Fan Dong; Yifan Shen; Fengbin Gao; Tianyuan Xu; Xianjin Wang; Xiaohua Zhang; Shan Zhong; Minguang Zhang; Shanwen Chen; Zhoujun Shen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.