Rashmi Kudesia1, Tomer Singer2, Thomas A Caputo1, Kevin Michael Holcomb1, Isaac Kligman2, Zev Rosenwaks2, Divya Gupta3. 1. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. 2. Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. 3. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. Electronic address: dig2010@med.cornell.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated fertility and oncological outcomes in women with complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) or nonmyoinvasive grade 1 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EM) who desired fertility-sparing therapy. STUDY DESIGN: The retrospective cohort study included women younger than 45 years with CAH or EM who desired fertility-sparing treatment at our institution. Only patients for whom both oncological treatment and pregnancy outcomes were available were included. Statistical analyses were performed using a Fisher exact test, Pearson χ(2) test, and Spearman rank correlation test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were identified, and 23 (13 CAH, 10 EM) met the inclusion criteria. All 23 patients had at least 1 prior pregnancy. Treatment was split between oral progesterone only (38.5% CAH, 40% EM), levonorgestrel intrauterine device only (30.8% CAH, 20% EM), and both (30.8% CAH, 40% EM). After a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 3-74 months), 9 patients (46.2% CAH, 30% EM, P = .39) had persistent/progressive disease. Eight patients (30.8% CAH, 40% EM, P = .69) ultimately had a hysterectomy, and 3 of these (13.0%) were found to have persistent/progressive disease. Median time from diagnosis to hysterectomy was 13 months (range, 4-56 months). Fourteen of the 23 patients utilized assisted reproductive techniques (60.9%); 12 underwent IVF and 2 chose a gestation carrier. Seven clinical intrauterine pregnancies (30.4%) resulting in 6 live births (26.1%) were found in the entire cohort. CONCLUSION: Fertility-sparing treatment for CAH and grade 1 endometrial cancer is feasible with progestin therapy and leads to clinically meaningful rates of pregnancy in young women who desire fertility.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated fertility and oncological outcomes in women with complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) or nonmyoinvasive grade 1 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EM) who desired fertility-sparing therapy. STUDY DESIGN: The retrospective cohort study included women younger than 45 years with CAH or EM who desired fertility-sparing treatment at our institution. Only patients for whom both oncological treatment and pregnancy outcomes were available were included. Statistical analyses were performed using a Fisher exact test, Pearson χ(2) test, and Spearman rank correlation test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were identified, and 23 (13 CAH, 10 EM) met the inclusion criteria. All 23 patients had at least 1 prior pregnancy. Treatment was split between oral progesterone only (38.5% CAH, 40% EM), levonorgestrel intrauterine device only (30.8% CAH, 20% EM), and both (30.8% CAH, 40% EM). After a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 3-74 months), 9 patients (46.2% CAH, 30% EM, P = .39) had persistent/progressive disease. Eight patients (30.8% CAH, 40% EM, P = .69) ultimately had a hysterectomy, and 3 of these (13.0%) were found to have persistent/progressive disease. Median time from diagnosis to hysterectomy was 13 months (range, 4-56 months). Fourteen of the 23 patients utilized assisted reproductive techniques (60.9%); 12 underwent IVF and 2 chose a gestation carrier. Seven clinical intrauterine pregnancies (30.4%) resulting in 6 live births (26.1%) were found in the entire cohort. CONCLUSION: Fertility-sparing treatment for CAH and grade 1 endometrial cancer is feasible with progestin therapy and leads to clinically meaningful rates of pregnancy in young women who desire fertility.
Authors: Henry D Reyes; Matthew J Carlson; Eric J Devor; Yuping Zhang; Kristina W Thiel; Megan I Samuelson; Megan McDonald; Shujie Yang; Jean-Marie Stephan; Erica C Savage; Donghai Dai; Michael J Goodheart; Kimberly K Leslie Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Brigitte Gerstl; Elizabeth Sullivan; Marcus Vallejo; Jana Koch; Maximilian Johnson; Handan Wand; Kate Webber; Angela Ives; Antoinette Anazodo Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Stephanie S Faubion; Kathy L MacLaughlin; Margaret E Long; Sandhya Pruthi; Petra M Casey Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Gaetano Riemma; Jose Carugno; Benito Chiofalo; George Angelos Vilos; Stefano Cianci; Mehmet Sukru Budak; Bernardo Portugal Lasmar; Antonio Raffone; Ilker Kahramanoglu Journal: Transl Cancer Res Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 1.241