Literature DB >> 26524723

Downregulation of FOXO1 mRNA levels predicts treatment failure in patients with endometrial pathology conservatively managed with progestin-containing intrauterine devices.

Henry D Reyes1, Matthew J Carlson2, Eric J Devor3, Yuping Zhang4, Kristina W Thiel5, Megan I Samuelson6, Megan McDonald7, Shujie Yang8, Jean-Marie Stephan9, Erica C Savage10, Donghai Dai11, Michael J Goodheart12, Kimberly K Leslie13.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine hormone receptor expression levels and downstream gene activation in pre-treatment and post-treatment biopsies in a cohort of patients with endometrial pathology who were being conservatively managed with a progestin-containing intrauterine device (IUD). A molecular signature of treatment failure is proposed.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of pre- and post-treatment biopsy specimens from 10 women treated with progestin-containing IUD for complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) or grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma was performed. Expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and PR target genes was examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative RT-PCR.
RESULTS: The mean treatment duration was 14.3 months. Four CAH patients had stable disease or regressed after treatment, and four progressed to endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Both patients with an initial diagnosis of endometrioid adenocarcinoma regressed to CAH or no disease. In general, hormone receptor levels diminished post-treatment compared to pre-treatment biopsies; however, we noted unexpected higher expression of the B isoform of PR (PRB) as well as ER in those patients who progressed to frank cancer. There was a trend towards a non-nuclear cytoplasmic location of PRB in these patients. Importantly, the differentiating impact of PR signaling, as determined by the expression of the progestin-controlled tumor suppressor FOXO1, was lost in individuals who progressed on therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: FOXO1 mRNA levels may serve as a biomarker for response to therapy and an indicator of PR function in patients being conservatively managed with a progestin-containing IUD.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial cancer; Endometrial hyperplasia; FOXO1; Progesterone receptor; Progestin-containing intrauterine devices

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26524723      PMCID: PMC4784706          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  34 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Progestin treatment of atypical hyperplasia and well-differentiated carcinoma of the endometrium in women under age 40.

Authors:  T C Randall; R J Kurman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Reproductive, menstrual, and medical risk factors for endometrial cancer: results from a case-control study.

Authors:  L A Brinton; M L Berman; R Mortel; L B Twiggs; R J Barrett; G D Wilbanks; L Lannom; R N Hoover
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Conservative therapy for adenocarcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia of the endometrium in young women: central pathologic review and treatment outcome.

Authors:  T Kaku; H Yoshikawa; H Tsuda; A Sakamoto; M Fukunaga; Y Kuwabara; M Hataeg; S Kodama; K Kuzuya; S Sato; T Nishimura; M Hiura; H Nakano; T Iwasaka; K Miyazaki; T Kamura
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2001-06-10       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  Prediction of regression and relapse of endometrial hyperplasia with conservative therapy.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gallos; Raji Ganesan; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Temsirolimus with or without megestrol acetate and tamoxifen for endometrial cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Gini F Fleming; Virginia L Filiaci; Brandon Marzullo; Richard J Zaino; Susan A Davidson; Michael Pearl; Vicky Makker; James J Burke; Susan L Zweizig; Linda Van Le; Parviz Hanjani; Gordon Downey; Joan L Walker; Henry D Reyes; Kimberly K Leslie
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of "untreated" hyperplasia in 170 patients.

Authors:  R J Kurman; P F Kaminski; H J Norris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Endometrial curettage in abnormal uterine bleeding and efficacy of progestins for control in cases of hyperplasia.

Authors:  Simender Mesci-Haftaci; Handan Ankarali; Ali Yavuzcan; Mete Caglar
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2014

Review 9.  Past, present, and future of hormonal therapy in recurrent endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Carlson; Kristina W Thiel; Kimberly K Leslie
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-05-02

10.  Systematic dissection of the mechanisms underlying progesterone receptor downregulation in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Shujie Yang; Yichen Jia; Xiaoyue Liu; Christopher Winters; Xinjun Wang; Yuping Zhang; Eric J Devor; Adriann M Hovey; Henry D Reyes; Xue Xiao; Yang Xu; Donghai Dai; Xiangbing Meng; Kristina W Thiel; Frederick E Domann; Kimberly K Leslie
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-10-30
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of the LNG-IUS for treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and early stage endometrial cancer: Can biomarkers predict response?

Authors:  Molly Dore; Sara Filoche; Kirsty Danielson; Claire Henry
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-02-19

2.  Characterisation of Levonorgestrel-Resistant Endometrial Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Molly Dore; Sara Filoche; Kirsty Danielson; Claire Henry
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Identification of potential models for predicting progestin insensitivity in patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia and endometrioid endometrial cancer based on ATAC-Seq and RNA-Seq integrated analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Li Hu; Gulinazi Yierfulati; Lu-Lu Wang; Bing-Yi Yang; Qiao-Ying Lv; Xiao-Jun Chen
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 4.  Fertility-Sparing Approach in Patients with Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer Grade 2 Stage IA (FIGO): A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Pierluigi Giampaolino; Valeria Cafasso; Dominga Boccia; Mario Ascione; Antonio Mercorio; Francesco Viciglione; Mario Palumbo; Paolo Serafino; Cira Buonfantino; Maria Chiara De Angelis; Paolo Verrazzo; Giovanna Grasso; Giuseppe Gullo; Giuseppe Bifulco; Luigi Della Corte
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Significance of serum and pathological biomarkers in fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yiqin Wang; Rong Zhou; Xiaobo Zhang; Huixin Liu; Danhua Shen; Jianliu Wang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.809

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.