Sharon Manne1, Shannon Myers2, Melissa Ozga3, David Kissane3, Debby Kashy4, Stephen Rubin5, Carolyn Heckman6, Norm Rosenblum7. 1. Cancer Institute of New Jersey. Electronic address: sharon.manne@rutgers.edu. 2. Cancer Institute of New Jersey. 3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. 4. Michigan State University. 5. University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. 6. Fox Chase Cancer Center. 7. Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Little attention has been paid to the role of holding back sharing concerns in the psychological adaptation of women newly diagnosed with gynecological cancers. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the role of holding back concerns in psychosocial adjustment and quality of life, as well as a possible moderating role for emotional expressivity and perceived unsupportive responses from family and friends. METHOD: Two hundred forty-four women diagnosed with gynecological cancer in the past 8 months completed measures of holding back, dispositional emotional expressivity, perceived unsupportive responses from family and friends, cancer-specific distress, depressive symptoms and quality of life. RESULTS: Emotional expressivity moderated the association between holding back and cancer-specific distress and quality of life, but not depressive symptoms. Greater holding back was more strongly associated with higher levels of cancer-related distress among women who were more emotionally expressive than among women who were less expressive. Perceived unsupportive responses did not moderate the associations between holding back and psychosocial outcomes. CONCLUSION: Holding back sharing concerns was more common in this patient population than other cancer populations. Dispositional expressivity played a role in how harmful holding back concerns was for women, while unsupportive responses from family and friends did not.
OBJECTIVE: Little attention has been paid to the role of holding back sharing concerns in the psychological adaptation of women newly diagnosed with gynecological cancers. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the role of holding back concerns in psychosocial adjustment and quality of life, as well as a possible moderating role for emotional expressivity and perceived unsupportive responses from family and friends. METHOD: Two hundred forty-four women diagnosed with gynecological cancer in the past 8 months completed measures of holding back, dispositional emotional expressivity, perceived unsupportive responses from family and friends, cancer-specific distress, depressive symptoms and quality of life. RESULTS: Emotional expressivity moderated the association between holding back and cancer-specific distress and quality of life, but not depressive symptoms. Greater holding back was more strongly associated with higher levels of cancer-related distress among women who were more emotionally expressive than among women who were less expressive. Perceived unsupportive responses did not moderate the associations between holding back and psychosocial outcomes. CONCLUSION: Holding back sharing concerns was more common in this patient population than other cancer populations. Dispositional expressivity played a role in how harmful holding back concerns was for women, while unsupportive responses from family and friends did not.
Authors: Patricia A Parker; Andrzej Kudelka; Karen Basen-Engquist; John Kavanagh; Janet de Moor; Lorenzo Cohen Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2005-10-20 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Sharon L Manne; David W Kissane; Christian J Nelson; John P Mulhall; Gary Winkel; Talia Zaider Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Tina R Norton; Sharon L Manne; Stephen Rubin; Enrique Hernandez; John Carlson; Cynthia Bergman; Norman Rosenblum Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Tina R Norton; Sharon L Manne; Stephen Rubin; John Carlson; Enrique Hernandez; Mitchell I Edelson; Norman Rosenblum; David Warshal; Cynthia Bergman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: E L Trimble; J D Adams; D Vena; M J Hawkins; M A Friedman; J S Fisherman; M C Christian; R Canetta; N Onetto; R Hayn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1993-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Caroline S Dorfman; Eneka Lamb; Alyssa Van Denburg; Anava A Wren; Mary Scott Soo; Kaylee Faircloth; Vicky Gandhi; Rebecca A Shelby Journal: J Psychosoc Oncol Date: 2018-01-11
Authors: Shelby L Langer; Joan M Romano; Francis Keefe; Donald H Baucom; Timothy Strauman; Karen L Syrjala; Niall Bolger; John Burns; Jonathan B Bricker; Michael Todd; Brian R W Baucom; Melanie S Fischer; Neeta Ghosh; Julie Gralow; Veena Shankaran; S Yousuf Zafar; Kelly Westbrook; Karena Leo; Katherine Ramos; Danielle M Weber; Laura S Porter Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-02-07
Authors: Kathrin Milbury; Anne S Tsao; Zhongxing Liao; April Owns; Rosalinda Engle; Edrea A Gonzalez; Eduardo Bruera; Lorenzo Cohen Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2018-01-24
Authors: Shelby L Langer; Joan M Romano; Michael Todd; Timothy J Strauman; Francis J Keefe; Karen L Syrjala; Jonathan B Bricker; Neeta Ghosh; John W Burns; Niall Bolger; Blair K Puleo; Julie R Gralow; Veena Shankaran; Kelly Westbrook; S Yousuf Zafar; Laura S Porter Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2018-10-10