Literature DB >> 24210961

Regional brain activity change predicts responsiveness to treatment for stuttering in adults.

Roger J Ingham1, Yuedong Wang, Janis C Ingham, Anne K Bothe, Scott T Grafton.   

Abstract

Developmental stuttering is known to be associated with aberrant brain activity, but there is no evidence that this knowledge has benefited stuttering treatment. This study investigated whether brain activity could predict progress during stuttering treatment for 21 dextral adults who stutter (AWS). They received one of two treatment programs that included periodic H2(15)O PET scanning (during oral reading, monologue, and eyes-closed rest conditions). All participants successfully completed an initial treatment phase and then entered a phase designed to transfer treatment gains; 9/21 failed to complete this latter phase. The 12 pass and 9 fail participants were similar on speech and neural system variables before treatment, and similar in speech performance after the initial phase of their treatment. At the end of the initial treatment phase, however, decreased activation within a single region, L. putamen, in all 3 scanning conditions was highly predictive of successful treatment progress.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  %SS; AUC; AWS; CONT; E; FDR; FG; MONO; MPI; Monologue; NAT; Oral reading; PET; PG; PS; PT; READ; REST; ROC; SFSPM; Stuttering; T; TRPI; Treatment; adults who stutter; area under the curve; controls; establishment; eyes closed rest; fail group; false discovery rate; modifying phonation intervals; monologue; oral reading; pass group; percent syllables stuttered; pretreatment; prolonged speech; receiver operating characteristics; speech naturalness; stutter-free syllables spoken per minute; target range phonated interval; transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24210961     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  6 in total

1.  Efficacy of the Modifying Phonation Intervals (MPI) Stuttering Treatment Program With Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  Roger J Ingham; Janis C Ingham; Anne K Bothe; Yuedong Wang; Martin Kilgo
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Modulation of auditory processing during speech movement planning is limited in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Ludo Max
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 3.  The state of the art in non-pharmacological interventions for developmental stuttering. Part 1: a systematic review of effectiveness.

Authors:  Susan Baxter; Maxine Johnson; Lindsay Blank; Anna Cantrell; Shelagh Brumfitt; Pam Enderby; Elizabeth Goyder
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Separation of trait and state in stuttering.

Authors:  Emily L Connally; David Ward; Christos Pliatsikas; Sarah Finnegan; Mark Jenkinson; Rowan Boyles; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  The Dopamine System and Automatization of Movement Sequences: A Review With Relevance for Speech and Stuttering.

Authors:  Per A Alm
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Elevated iron concentration in putamen and cortical speech motor network in developmental stuttering.

Authors:  Gabriel J Cler; Saloni Krishnan; Daniel Papp; Charlotte E E Wiltshire; Jennifer Chesters; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 13.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.