Literature DB >> 24210511

Assessment of wastewater and recycled water quality: a comparison of lines of evidence from in vitro, in vivo and chemical analyses.

Frederic D L Leusch1, Stuart J Khan2, M Monique Gagnon3, Pam Quayle4, Trang Trinh2, Heather Coleman2, Christopher Rawson3, Heather F Chapman4, Palenque Blair5, Helen Nice6, Tarren Reitsema7.   

Abstract

We investigated water quality at an advanced water reclamation plant and three conventional wastewater treatment plants using an "ecotoxicity toolbox" consisting of three complementary analyses (chemical analysis, in vitro bioanalysis and in situ biological monitoring), with a focus on endocrine disruption. The in vitro bioassays were chosen to provide an appropriately wide coverage of biological effects relevant to managed aquifer recharge and environmental discharge of treated wastewater, and included bioassays for bacterial toxicity (Microtox), genotoxicity (umuC), photosynthesis inhibition (Max-I-PAM) and endocrine effects (E-SCREEN and AR-CALUX). Chemical analysis of hormones and pesticides using LCMSMS was performed in parallel to correlate standard analytical methods with the in vitro assessment. For two plants with surface water discharge into open drains, further field work was carried out to examine in situ effects using mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) as a bioindicator species for possible endocrine effects. The results show considerable cytotoxicity, phytotoxicity, estrogenicity and androgenicity in raw sewage, all of which were significantly reduced by conventional wastewater treatment. No biological response was detected to RO water, suggesting that reverse osmosis is a significant barrier to biologically active compounds. Chemical analysis and in situ monitoring revealed trends consistent with the in vitro results: chemical analysis confirmed the removal trends observed by the bioanalytical tools, and in situ sampling did not reveal any evidence of endocrine disruption specifically due to discharge of treated wastewater (although other sources may be present). Biomarkers of exposure (in vitro) and effect (in vivo or in situ) are complementary and together provide information with a high level of ecological relevance. This study illustrates the utility of combining multiple lines of evidence in the assessment of water quality.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioanalytical tools; EDC; LCMSMS; Mosquitofish; Vitellogenin; Water quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24210511     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  7 in total

1.  An assessment of endocrine activity in Australian rivers using chemical and in vitro analyses.

Authors:  Philip D Scott; Michael Bartkow; Stephen J Blockwell; Heather M Coleman; Stuart J Khan; Richard Lim; James A McDonald; Helen Nice; Dayanthi Nugegoda; Vincent Pettigrove; Louis A Tremblay; Michael St J Warne; Frederic D L Leusch
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Screening for Endocrine Activity in Water Using Commercially-available In Vitro Transactivation Bioassays.

Authors:  Alvine C Mehinto; B Sumith Jayasinghe; Darcy R Vandervort; Nancy D Denslow; Keith A Maruya
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-04       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Effectivity of advanced wastewater treatment: reduction of in vitro endocrine activity and mutagenicity but not of in vivo reproductive toxicity.

Authors:  Sabrina Giebner; Sina Ostermann; Susanne Straskraba; Matthias Oetken; Jörg Oehlmann; Martin Wagner
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Relevance of Toxicity Assessment in Wastewater Treatments: Case Study-Four Fenton Processes Applied to the Mineralization of C.I. Acid Red 14.

Authors:  Rajaa Idel-Aouad; Manuel Valiente; Carmen Gutiérrez-Bouzán; Mercè Vilaseca; Abdlrani Yaacoubi; Boumediene Tanouti; Montserrat López-Mesas
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  Towards Sustainable Environmental Quality: Priority Research Questions for the Australasian Region of Oceania.

Authors:  Sally Gaw; Andrew Harford; Vincent Pettigrove; Graham Sevicke-Jones; Therese Manning; James Ataria; Tom Cresswell; Katherine A Dafforn; Frederic Dl Leusch; Bradley Moggridge; Marcus Cameron; John Chapman; Gary Coates; Anne Colville; Claire Death; Kimberly Hageman; Kathryn Hassell; Molly Hoak; Jennifer Gadd; Dianne F Jolley; Ali Karami; Konstantinos Kotzakoulakis; Richard Lim; Nicole McRae; Leon Metzeling; Thomas Mooney; Jackie Myers; Andrew Pearson; Minna Saaristo; Dave Sharley; Julia Stuthe; Oliver Sutherland; Oliver Thomas; Louis Tremblay; Waitangi Wood; Alistair Ba Boxall; Murray A Rudd; Bryan W Brooks
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.992

6.  Submicron polymer particles may mask the presence of toxicants in wastewater effluents probed by reporter gene containing bacteria.

Authors:  Bhuvaneshwari Manivannan; Evgeni Eltzov; Mikhail Borisover
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  New Toxicology Tools and the Emerging Paradigm Shift in Environmental Health Decision-Making.

Authors:  Gary L Ginsberg; Kristi Pullen Fedinick; Gina M Solomon; Kevin C Elliott; John J Vandenberg; Stan Barone; John R Bucher
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.