| Literature DB >> 24204916 |
Inés Beperet1, Gloria Barrera, Oihane Simón, Trevor Williams, Miguel López-Ferber, Laila Gasmi, Salvador Herrero, Primitivo Caballero.
Abstract
A recombinant virus lacking the sf32 gene (Sf32null), unique to the Spodoptera frugiperda multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (SfMNPV), was generated by homologous recombination from a bacmid comprising the complete viral genome (Sfbac). Transcriptional analysis revealed that sf32 is an early gene. Occlusion bodies (OBs) of Sf32null contained 62% more genomic DNA than viruses containing the sf32 gene, Sfbac and Sf32null-repair, although Sf32null DNA was three-fold less infective when injected in vivo. Sf32null OBs were 18% larger in diameter and contained 17% more nucleocapsids within ODVs than those of Sfbac. No significant differences were detected in OB pathogenicity (50% lethal concentration), speed-of-kill or budded virus production in vivo. In contrast, the production of OBs/larva was reduced by 39% in insects infected by Sf32null compared to those infected by Sfbac. The SF32 predicted protein sequence showed homology (25% identity, 44% similarity) to two adhesion proteins from Streptococcus pyogenes and a single N-mirystoylation site was predicted. We conclude that SF32 is a non-essential protein that could be involved in nucleocapsid organization during ODV assembly and occlusion, resulting in increased numbers of nucleocapsids within ODVs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24204916 PMCID: PMC3813766 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Primers used in this study.
| Primers | Sequences | Amplification purpose |
| Sf32del.1 |
|
|
| Sf32del.2 |
|
|
| Sf32del.3 |
|
|
| Sf32del.4 |
|
|
| Sf32rep.1 |
|
|
| Sf32rep.2 |
|
|
| Sf32.1 |
|
|
| Sf32.2 |
|
|
| Sfpolh.1 |
|
|
| Sfpolh.2 |
|
|
| egt.1 |
|
|
| egt.2 |
|
|
| qSf.1 |
| BVs production (qPCR); forward primer that amplifies in the |
| qSf.2 |
| BVs production (qPCR); reverse primer that amplifies in the |
Figure 1Temporal expression of a) sf32, b) polyhedrin (polh) and c) egt of SfMNPV.
RT-PCR analysis of sf32, polh and egt was performed on total RNA extracted from infected larvae at indicated times post infection (hpi). Transcript amplifications were performed using Sf32.1 and Sf32.2 primers for sf32, Sfpolh.1 and Sfpolh.2 primers for polh and egt.1 and egt.2 primers for egt. RNA was previously treated with DNase and the same amount of RNA was used for sf32, polh and egt amplifications. M indicates RNA from mock-infected larvae (negative control) and C is a positive amplification control of DNA.
Figure 2Effects of sf32 deletion in the biological activity of the virus.
a) Mean virus-induced mortalities following DNA injection. Values above the columns indicate means and those labeled with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05). Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Mortality was recorded until larvae had either died or pupated. b) Mean amounts of DNA extracted from samples of 106 OBs of Sfbac, Sf32null and Sf32null-repair viruses. Values above columns indicate means and those labeled with different letters differed significantly (t-test, p<0.05). Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. c) ODV content in 5×108 OBs of Sfbac and Sf32null. Sf9 cells were serially infected (1∶5, 1∶25, 1∶125, and 1∶625) with ODVs released from OBs. ODV titers (ODV/ml) were calculated by end point dilution. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. d) Kaplan-Meier survival curves showing estimates of that the probability of an infected S. frugiperda larva surviving to different intervals following infection by each virus. Continuous and discontinuous lines represent Sfbac and Sf32null survival curves, respectively. e) OB production values in larvae infected with Sfbac and Sf32null viruses. Values above the columns indicate means. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. f) Dynamics of BV production through the time. Squares represent Sfbac values and triangles represent Sf32null values. Error bars indicate the standard deviation. No significant differences were observed in BV temporal production patterns between Sfbac and Sf32null viruses (p>0.05).
LC50 values and mean time to death (MTD) for Sfbac and Sf32null in second instar S. frugiperda larvae.
| Virus | LC50 | Relative | 95% Confidence limits | MTD | 95% Confidence limits | ||
| (OBs/ml) | Potency | Low | High | (h) | Low | High | |
|
| 1.76×104 | 1.00 | − | − | 161a | 157 | 165 |
|
| 1.77×104 | 0.99 | 0.66 | 1.50 | 161a | 157 | 166 |
Probit analysis was performed using the PoloPlus program. The hypothesis of equality was not rejected (χ2 = 0.01, df = 2, p = 0.997) and a test for nonparallelism was not significant (χ2 = 0.01, df = 1, p = 0.947) such that regressions were fitted with a common slope of 1.163±0.092 (mean ± S.E.). Relative potency was calculated as the ratio of effective concentrations relative to Sfbac OBs. Mean time to death values (MTDs) were estimated by Weibull analysis [29]. MTDs labeled with same letter did not differ significantly (p>0.05).
Figure 3Electron microscopy of Sfbac and Sf32null OBs.
A) Scanning electron microscopy (×6,000) of Sfbac and Sf32null OBs. Sf32 deletion did not affect gross OB morphology although Sf32null OBs were approximately 18% larger in diameter than those of the Sfbac virus. B) Transmission electron microscopy (×40,000) of Sfbac and Sf32null OBs showing the distribution of single and multiple nucleocapsid ODVs. C) Mean number of ODVs occluded within OBs as determined by TEM analysis. D) Mean nucleocapsid content of ODVs estimated by analysis of OB sections following TEM. Values above columns indicate means and those labeled with different letters differed significantly (t-test, p<0.05). Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
Figure 4Sequence analysis of sf32.
An early promoter motif and a TATA box were found upstream from the initiation codon. Numbers indicate predicted post-translational modifications and functional motifs of the protein. 1: N-myristoylation site; 2: casein-kinase II phosphorylation site; 3 and 5: N-glycosylation sites; 4: tyrosine-kinase phosphorylation site; 6: protein kinase C phosphorylation site.