Literature DB >> 24202829

Resource competition and reproduction : The relationship between economic and parental strategies in the Krummhörn population (1720-1874).

E Voland1, R I Dunbar.   

Abstract

A family reconstitution study of the Krummhörn population (Ostfriesland, Germany, 1720-1874) reveals that infant mortality and children's probabilities of marrying or emigrating unmarried are affected by the number of living same-sexed sibs in farmers' families but not in the families of landless laborers. We interpret these results in terms of a "local resource competition" model in which resource-holding families are obliged to manipulate the reproductive future of their offspring. In contrast, families that lack resources have no need to manipulate their offspring and are more likely to benefit from allowing their offspring to capitalize on whatever opportunities to reproduce present themselves.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 24202829     DOI: 10.1007/BF02734134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  7 in total

1.  Childhood mortality, family size and birth order in pre-industrial Europe.

Authors:  J E Cohen
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1975-02

2.  Effects of reproductive behaviour on infant mortality of French-Canadians during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.

Authors:  F Nault; B Desjardins; J Légaré
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1990-07

3.  Risk factors for infant mortality in nineteenth-century Sweden.

Authors:  K A Lynch; J B Greenhouse
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1994-03

4.  How did the Krummhörn elite males achieve above-average reproductive success?

Authors:  H Klindworth; E Voland
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1995-09

5.  Age structure and sex-biased mortality among Herero pastoralists.

Authors:  H C Harpending; R Pennington
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 0.553

6.  Darwin and the puzzle of primogeniture : An essay on biases in parental investment after death.

Authors:  S B Hrdy; D S Judge
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-03

7.  Ecological demography: a synthetic focus in evolutionary anthropology.

Authors:  B S Low
Journal:  Evol Anthropol       Date:  1993
  7 in total
  17 in total

1.  Intergenerational and sibling conflict under patrilocality. A model of reproductive skew applied to human kinship.

Authors:  Ting Ji; Jing-Jing Xu; Ruth Mace
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2014-03

2.  How did the Krummhörn elite males achieve above-average reproductive success?

Authors:  H Klindworth; E Voland
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1995-09

3.  Urbanization and daughter-biased parental investment in Fiji.

Authors:  Dawn B Neill
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2011-07

Review 4.  Parental investment and the optimization of human family size.

Authors:  David W Lawson; Ruth Mace
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Land inheritance establishes sibling competition for marriage and reproduction in rural Ethiopia.

Authors:  Mhairi A Gibson; Eshetu Gurmu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Does Kin-Selection Theory Help to Explain Support Networks among Farmers in South-Central Ethiopia?

Authors:  Lucie Clech; Ashley Hazel; Mhairi A Gibson
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2019-12

7.  Linking dispersal and resources in humans : Life history data from Oakham, Massachusetts (1750-1850).

Authors:  M C Towner
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2001-12

8.  Brothers and sisters : How sibling interactions affect optimal parental allocations.

Authors:  M B Mulder
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1998-06

9.  Optimizing Modern Family Size: Trade-offs between Fertility and the Economic Costs of Reproduction.

Authors:  David W Lawson; Ruth Mace
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2010-03-09

10.  Middleborns disadvantaged? Testing birth-order effects on fitness in pre-industrial Finns.

Authors:  Charlotte Faurie; Andrew F Russell; Virpi Lummaa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.