Literature DB >> 24201505

Potential taxonomic use of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD): a case study in Brassica.

T Demeke1, R P Adams, R Chibbar.   

Abstract

The potential use of RAPDs for taxonomic studies were investigated using Brassica, Sinapis and Raphanus taxa. Principal coordinate analysis of 284 RAPD bands revealed the classical U triangle relationship between diploid and amphidiploid Brassica taxa. Raphanus sativus and S. alba were distinct from the Brassica taxa. It appears that at least ten primers with approximately 100 total bands are needed to adequately portray these relationships. Cultivars of cabbage and cauliflower were separated by RAPDs. Analysis of RAPDs from individual plants of B. carinata cv. dodola resulted in 69 RAPDs, with 91.7% monomorphic and 8.3% polymorphic bands. RAPDs appear to be useful for taxonomic studies at levels ranging from populations to species and perhaps genera.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID： 24201505     DOI： 10.1007/BF00227415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN： 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  12 in total

1.  DNA amplification fingerprinting using very short arbitrary oligonucleotide primers.

Authors:  G Caetano-Anollés; B J Bassam; P M Gresshoff
Journal:  Biotechnology (N Y)       Date:  1991-06

2.  Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations.

Authors:  R W Michelmore; I Paran; R V Kesseli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Chloroplast DNA evolution and the origin of amphidiploid Brassica species.

Authors:  J D Palmer; C R Shields; D B Cohen; T J Orton
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Development and chromosomal localization of genome-specific markers by polymerase chain reaction in Brassica.

Authors:  C F Quiros; J Hu; P This; A M Chevre; M Delseny
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Isolation of molecular markers for tomato (L. esculentum) using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD).

Authors:  R M Klein-Lankhorst; A Vermunt; R Weide; T Liharska; P Zabel
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Segregation of random amplified DNA markers in F1 progeny of conifers.

Authors:  J E Carlson; L K Tulsieram; J C Glaubitz; V W Luk; C Kauffeldt; R Rutledge
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers.

Authors:  J G Williams; A R Kubelik; K J Livak; J A Rafalski; S V Tingey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Rapid identification of markers linked to a Pseudomonas resistance gene in tomato by using random primers and near-isogenic lines.

Authors:  G B Martin; J G Williams; S D Tanksley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers.

Authors:  J Welsh; M McClelland
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-12-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Analysis of the Brassica oleracea genome by the generation of B. campestris-oleracea chromosome addition lines: characterization by isozymes and rDNA genes.

Authors:  C F Quiros; O Ochoa; S F Kianian; D Douches
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.699
View more
  19 in total

1.  A simple method to estimate the percentage of hybridity in canola (Brassica napus) F1 hybrids.

Authors:  P Marshall; M C Marchand; Z Lisieczko; B S Landry
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  PCR-based fingerprinting using AFLPs as a tool for studying genetic relationships in Lactuca spp.

Authors:  M Hill; H Witsenboer; M Zabeau; P Vos; R Kesseli; R Michelmore
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  A comparison of RAPD and isozyme analyses for determining the genetic relationships among Avena sterilis L. accessions.

Authors:  M Heun; J P Murphy; T D Phillips
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  RAPD DNA fingerprints and terpenoids: clues to past migrations of Juniperus in Arabia and east Africa.

Authors:  R P Adams; T Demeke; H A Abulfatih
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Comparison of RFLP and RAPD markers to estimating genetic relationships within and among cruciferous species.

Authors:  C E Thormann; M E Ferreira; L E Camargo; J G Tivang; T C Osborn
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Genetic diversity of potato determined by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis.

Authors:  T Demeke; D R Lynch; L M Kawchuk; G C Kozub; J D Armstrong
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.570

7.  Comparison of phenotypic and molecular distances to predict heterosis and F1 performance in Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun).

Authors:  Adefris Teklewold; Heiko C Becker
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  The identification of duplicate accessions within a rice germplasm collection using RAPD analysis.

Authors:  P S Virk; H J Newbury; M T Jackson; B V Ford-Lloyd
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  RAPD fingerprinting of blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.) cultivars.

Authors:  P G Lanham; R M Brennan; C Hackett; R J McNicol
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Evidence of two genetic entities in Bothriocephalus funiculus (Cestoda) detected by arbitrary-primer polymerase chain reaction random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  O Verneau; F Thomas; A de Meeüs; F Catzeflis; F Renaud
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.289
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.