Literature DB >> 24198483

Significance of novel bioinorganic anodic aluminum oxide nanoscaffolds for promoting cellular response.

Gérrard Eddy Jai Poinern1, Robert Shackleton, Shariful Islam Mamun, Derek Fawcett.   

Abstract

Tissue engineering is a multidisciplinary field that can directly benefit from the many advancements in nanotechnology and nanoscience. This article reviews a novel biocompatible anodic aluminum oxide (AAO, alumina) membrane in terms of tissue engineering. Cells respond and interact with their natural environment, the extracellular matrix, and the landscape of the substrate. The interaction with the topographical features of the landscape occurs both in the micrometer and nanoscales. If all these parameters are favorable to the cell, the cell will respond in terms of adhesion, proliferation, and migration. The role of the substrate/scaffold is crucial in soliciting a favorable response from the cell. The size and type of surface feature can directly influence the response and behavior of the cell. In the case of using an AAO membrane, the surface features and porosity of the membrane can be dictated at the nanoscale during the manufacturing stage. This is achieved by using general laboratory equipment to perform a relatively straightforward electrochemical process. During this technique, changing the operational parameters of the process directly controls the nanoscale features produced. For example, the pore size, pore density, and, hence, density can be effectively controlled during the synthesis of the AAO membrane. In addition, being able to control the pore size and porosity of a biomaterial such as AAO significantly broadens its application in tissue engineering.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anodic aluminum oxide; cellular response; nanoscaffolds; tissue engineering

Year:  2011        PMID: 24198483      PMCID: PMC3781702          DOI: 10.2147/NSA.S13913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanotechnol Sci Appl        ISSN: 1177-8903


  92 in total

1.  Fabrication of a novel porous PGA-chitosan hybrid matrix for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Yu Chi Wang; Mei Chiao Lin; Da Ming Wang; Hsyue Jen Hsieh
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Designing materials for biology and medicine.

Authors:  Robert Langer; David A Tirrell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Fibroblast response to a controlled nanoenvironment produced by colloidal lithography.

Authors:  Matthew J Dalby; Mathis O Riehle; Duncan S Sutherland; Hossein Agheli; Adam S G Curtis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Controlled release of plasmid DNA from biodegradable scaffolds fabricated using a thermally-induced phase-separation method.

Authors:  Ki Woo Chun; Kyung Chul Cho; Sun Hwa Kim; Ji Hoon Jeong; Tae Gwan Park
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.517

Review 5.  Polyionic hydrocolloids for the intestinal delivery of protein drugs: alginate and chitosan--a review.

Authors:  Meera George; T Emilia Abraham
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Preparation of MPEG-PLA nanoparticle for honokiol delivery in vitro.

Authors:  XiuLing Zheng; Bing Kan; MaLing Gou; ShaoZhi Fu; Juan Zhang; Ke Men; LiJuan Chen; Feng Luo; YingLan Zhao; Xia Zhao; YuQuan Wei; ZhiYong Qian
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 5.875

7.  Biodegradable polymeric micelles composed of doxorubicin conjugated PLGA-PEG block copolymer.

Authors:  H S Yoo; T G Park
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2001-01-29       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  The effect of mesenchymal populations and vascular endothelial growth factor delivered from biodegradable polymer scaffolds on bone formation.

Authors:  Janos M Kanczler; Patrick J Ginty; John J A Barry; Nicholas M P Clarke; Steve M Howdle; Kevin M Shakesheff; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Polymers with nano-dimensional surface features enhance bladder smooth muscle cell adhesion.

Authors:  Anil Thapa; Thomas J Webster; Karen M Haberstroh
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of thiolated hyaluronic acid for mucoadhesive drug delivery.

Authors:  Krum Kafedjiiski; Ram K R Jetti; Florian Föger; Herbert Hoyer; Martin Werle; Martin Hoffer; Andreas Bernkop-Schnürch
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 5.875

View more
  5 in total

1.  Optimization of Anodic Porous Alumina Fabricated from Commercial Aluminum Food Foils: A Statistical Approach.

Authors:  Eva Riccomagno; Amirreza Shayganpour; Marco Salerno
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Fabrication of Gold-Coated Ultra-Thin Anodic Porous Alumina Substrates for Augmented SERS.

Authors:  Chiara Toccafondi; Remo Proietti Zaccaria; Silvia Dante; Marco Salerno
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 3.  Scanning Kelvin Probe Microscopy: Challenges and Perspectives towards Increased Application on Biomaterials and Biological Samples.

Authors:  Marco Salerno; Silvia Dante
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Chemical synthesis, characterisation, and biocompatibility of nanometre scale porous anodic aluminium oxide membranes for use as a cell culture substrate for the vero cell line: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Gérrard Eddy Jai Poinern; Xuan Thi Le; Mark O'Dea; Thomas Becker; Derek Fawcett
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Electrochemical coating of dental implants with anodic porous titania for enhanced osteointegration.

Authors:  Amirreza Shayganpour; Alberto Rebaudi; Pierpaolo Cortella; Alberto Diaspro; Marco Salerno
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.649

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.