BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a family of endogenous small non-coding RNAs, are associated with the development of renal diseases. To clarify whether urinary miRNAs (UmiRNAs) can be used for the evaluation of renal disease, we examined the profiles of UmiRNAs in various renal diseases. METHODS: We extracted miRNAs from urine specimens of 5 healthy controls and 71 patients with renal diseases, and we examined the correlation between clinical and histological parameters and the profile of UmiRNAs by microarray analysis. RESULTS: The urinary concentration of miRNAs increased in patients with renal disease compared with healthy controls, and the levels correlated with urinary protein and the degree of glomerular sclerosis. The microarray analysis detected 83-137 distinct UmiRNAs. We observed 80-99 % of the miRNAs in both the healthy controls and the renal disease patients. The majority of UmiRNAs displayed higher signal intensity in renal disease patients than in healthy controls, including 39 miRNAs exhibiting signal intensities 100 times greater than in healthy controls. A different pattern of UmiRNAs was observed in each type of renal disease. A comparison of renal tissue and UmiRNAs revealed that the sample profiles were similar and that their signal intensity was significantly correlated. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that UmiRNAs are correlated with renal pathological changes and that the profile of UmiRNAs presented different patterns corresponding to the type of renal disease. These results suggest that UmiRNAs can potentially be used as novel biomarkers for renal diseases.
BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a family of endogenous small non-coding RNAs, are associated with the development of renal diseases. To clarify whether urinary miRNAs (UmiRNAs) can be used for the evaluation of renal disease, we examined the profiles of UmiRNAs in various renal diseases. METHODS: We extracted miRNAs from urine specimens of 5 healthy controls and 71 patients with renal diseases, and we examined the correlation between clinical and histological parameters and the profile of UmiRNAs by microarray analysis. RESULTS: The urinary concentration of miRNAs increased in patients with renal disease compared with healthy controls, and the levels correlated with urinary protein and the degree of glomerular sclerosis. The microarray analysis detected 83-137 distinct UmiRNAs. We observed 80-99 % of the miRNAs in both the healthy controls and the renal diseasepatients. The majority of UmiRNAs displayed higher signal intensity in renal diseasepatients than in healthy controls, including 39 miRNAs exhibiting signal intensities 100 times greater than in healthy controls. A different pattern of UmiRNAs was observed in each type of renal disease. A comparison of renal tissue and UmiRNAs revealed that the sample profiles were similar and that their signal intensity was significantly correlated. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that UmiRNAs are correlated with renal pathological changes and that the profile of UmiRNAs presented different patterns corresponding to the type of renal disease. These results suggest that UmiRNAs can potentially be used as novel biomarkers for renal diseases.
Authors: Laura Denby; Vasudev Ramdas; Martin W McBride; Joe Wang; Hollie Robinson; John McClure; Wendy Crawford; Ruifang Lu; Dianne Z Hillyard; Raya Khanin; Reuven Agami; Anna F Dominiczak; Claire C Sharpe; Andrew H Baker Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Jonathan G Godwin; Xupeng Ge; Kristin Stephan; Anke Jurisch; Stefan G Tullius; John Iacomini Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-07-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M J Scian; D G Maluf; K G David; K J Archer; J L Suh; A R Wolen; M U Mba; H D Massey; A L King; T Gehr; A Cotterell; M Posner; V Mas Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Francis S Wolenski; Pooja Shah; Tomoya Sano; Tadahiro Shinozawa; Hugues Bernard; Matt J Gallacher; Shylah D Wyllie; Georgianna Varrone; Lisa A Cicia; Mary E Carsillo; Craig D Fisher; Sean E Ottinger; Erik Koenig; Patrick J Kirby Journal: J Appl Toxicol Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 3.446