BACKGROUND: New preventive technologies such as vaccines offer insight into psychological, social, and cultural landscapes. Providers have a key role in parents' decisions for vaccinating their children. Yet, perspectives from providers regarding the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, or vaccination in general, are rarely sought PURPOSE: Our objective in this paper is to understand how the HPV vaccine is perceived by health care providers and the multiple contextual meanings it elicits. METHODS: We conducted interviews with 20 health care professionals in Bulgaria about their attitudes and practices related to HPV vaccination and their recommendations for policies. The verbatim-transcribed interviews were analyzed through narrative analysis, with a special focus on language. RESULTS: We illustrate providers' contradictory and contextualized constructions of the vaccine and the narrative strategies they use to manage any uncertainty it elicits. These include being advocates and missionaries for preventive health, confirming their trust in the medical profession and professional organizations, challenging patients' concerns with rational explanations, normalizing the risk of medical innovations, and avoiding the sexual nature of HPV transmission. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a vaccine to prevent HPV infection, and by implication, possibly cervical and other cancers, created hope, and at the same time, intensified confusion and uncertainty. Providers have been frustrated for years with the rising mortality from cervical cancer in Bulgaria, and their perceived powerlessness in affecting this. HPV vaccination, on the other hand, seems relatively simple and "taming uncertainty" positions them as instrumental in limiting (or even eliminating) morbidity and mortality in future generations.
BACKGROUND: New preventive technologies such as vaccines offer insight into psychological, social, and cultural landscapes. Providers have a key role in parents' decisions for vaccinating their children. Yet, perspectives from providers regarding the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, or vaccination in general, are rarely sought PURPOSE: Our objective in this paper is to understand how the HPV vaccine is perceived by health care providers and the multiple contextual meanings it elicits. METHODS: We conducted interviews with 20 health care professionals in Bulgaria about their attitudes and practices related to HPV vaccination and their recommendations for policies. The verbatim-transcribed interviews were analyzed through narrative analysis, with a special focus on language. RESULTS: We illustrate providers' contradictory and contextualized constructions of the vaccine and the narrative strategies they use to manage any uncertainty it elicits. These include being advocates and missionaries for preventive health, confirming their trust in the medical profession and professional organizations, challenging patients' concerns with rational explanations, normalizing the risk of medical innovations, and avoiding the sexual nature of HPV transmission. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a vaccine to prevent HPV infection, and by implication, possibly cervical and other cancers, created hope, and at the same time, intensified confusion and uncertainty. Providers have been frustrated for years with the rising mortality from cervical cancer in Bulgaria, and their perceived powerlessness in affecting this. HPV vaccination, on the other hand, seems relatively simple and "taming uncertainty" positions them as instrumental in limiting (or even eliminating) morbidity and mortality in future generations.
Authors: Justin M Julius; Lois Ramondeta; Katherine A Tipton; Lincy S Lal; Karen Schneider; Judith A Smith Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Sharon J M Kessels; Helen S Marshall; Maureen Watson; Annette J Braunack-Mayer; Rob Reuzel; Rebecca L Tooher Journal: Vaccine Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Margaret O'Riordan; André Dahinden; Zekeriya Aktürk; José Miguel Bueno Ortiz; Nezih Dağdeviren; Glyn Elwyn; Adrian Micallef; Mikko Murtonen; Marianne Samuelson; Per Struk; Danny Tayar; Janecke Thesen Journal: Qual Prim Care Date: 2011
Authors: Lisa Cranley; Diane M Doran; Ann E Tourangeau; André Kushniruk; Lynn Nagle Journal: Worldviews Evid Based Nurs Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Geneviève Rail; Luisa Molino; Caroline Fusco; Moss Edward Norman; LeAnne Petherick; Jessica Polzer; Fiona Moola; Mary Bryson Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2018-08-03
Authors: Nelia M Afonso; Maurice J Kavanagh; Stephanie M Swanberg; Jeanne M Schulte; Tracy Wunderlich; Victoria C Lucia Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 3.295