Literature DB >> 24196462

Differences in outcomes following total ankle replacement in patients with neutral alignment compared with tibiotalar joint malalignment.

Robin M Queen1, Samuel B Adams, Nicholas A Viens, Jennifer K Friend, Mark E Easley, James K Deorio, James A Nunley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Excessive tibiotalar malalignment in the coronal plane has been considered by some to be a contraindication to total ankle replacement. The purpose of the present study was to compare clinical outcomes and physical performance measures according to preoperative tibiotalar alignment.
METHODS: One hundred and three patients undergoing total ankle replacement were grouped according to coronal plane tibiotalar alignment. Seventeen patients had an excessive deformity (>15° of varus or valgus), twenty-one had moderate valgus alignment (5° to 15° of valgus), twenty-seven had moderate varus alignment (5° to 15° of varus), and thirty-eight had neutral alignment (<5° of varus or valgus). Outcome measures, including the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), the Short Form-36 (SF-36), the timed up and go test (TUG), the four square step test (4SST), and walking speed, were assessed preoperatively and at one and two years after total ankle replacement.
RESULTS: Coronal plane alignment improved following the procedure, with 36.9% of patients having neutral alignment preoperatively as compared with 95% postoperatively. To achieve this alignment, adjunctive procedures, including deltoid ligament release, lateral ligament reconstruction, and posterior soft-tissue releases, were necessary. Significant improvements were seen for the Page: 3 AOFAS pain, function, alignment, and hindfoot scores (p < 0.001) and the SF-36 subscales of body pain, physical function, and role physical (p < 0.001) following total ankle replacement. Walking speed and the FADI, TUG, and 4SST scores also improved significantly (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant differences in clinical outcomes and physical performance measures based on preoperative coronal plane alignment.
CONCLUSIONS: Total ankle replacement improves clinical and functional outcomes independent of preoperative tibiotalar alignment when postoperative alignment is restored to neutral at the time of arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24196462     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

1.  Total ankle replacement: is pre-operative varus deformity a predictor of poor survival rate and clinical and radiological outcomes?

Authors:  Federico Giuseppe Usuelli; Claudia Angela Di Silvestri; Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Annalisa Orenti; Filippo Randelli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Are There Differences in Gait Mechanics in Patients With A Fixed Versus Mobile Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty? A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Robin M Queen; Christopher T Franck; Daniel Schmitt; Samuel B Adams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The Bologna-Oxford ankle replacement: a case series of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Ali Najefi; Karan Malhotra; Oliver Chan; Nicholas Cullen; Andy Goldberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Hip, Knee, and Ankle Osteoarthritis Negatively Affects Mechanical Energy Exchange.

Authors:  Robin M Queen; Tawnee L Sparling; Daniel Schmitt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Early Outcomes and Complications Following Initiation of a Total Ankle Arthroplasty Program.

Authors:  Gregory Lundeen; Kaitlin C Neary; Cody Kaiser; Lyle Jackson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2021-02-22

Review 6.  Patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Antonio Mazzotti; Alberto Arceri; Simone Zielli; Simone Bonelli; Valentina Viglione; Cesare Faldini
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-03-18

7.  What Are the Indications for Implant Revision in Three-component Total Ankle Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Daniel Richter; Nicola Krähenbühl; Roman Susdorf; Alexej Barg; Roxa Ruiz; Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.