Sukhwinder S Shergill1, Thomas P White1, Daniel W Joyce1, Paul M Bays2, Daniel M Wolpert3, Chris D Frith4. 1. Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. 2. Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. Sensorimotor Learning Group, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 4. Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Forward models predict the sensory consequences of planned actions and permit discrimination of self- and non-self-elicited sensation; their impairment in schizophrenia is implied by an abnormality in behavioral force-matching and the flawed agency judgments characteristic of positive symptoms, including auditory hallucinations and delusions of control. OBJECTIVE: To assess attenuation of sensory processing by self-action in individuals with schizophrenia and its relation to current symptom severity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Functional magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired while medicated individuals with schizophrenia (n = 19) and matched controls (n = 19) performed a factorially designed sensorimotor task in which the occurrence and relative timing of action and sensation were manipulated. The study took place at the neuroimaging research unit at the Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, and the Maudsley Hospital. RESULTS: In controls, a region of secondary somatosensory cortex exhibited attenuated activation when sensation and action were synchronous compared with when the former occurred after an unexpected delay or alone. By contrast, reduced attenuation was observed in the schizophrenia group, suggesting that these individuals were unable to predict the sensory consequences of their own actions. Furthermore, failure to attenuate secondary somatosensory cortex processing was predicted by current hallucinatory severity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although comparably reduced attenuation has been reported in the verbal domain, this work implies that a more general physiologic deficit underlies positive symptoms of schizophrenia.
IMPORTANCE: Forward models predict the sensory consequences of planned actions and permit discrimination of self- and non-self-elicited sensation; their impairment in schizophrenia is implied by an abnormality in behavioral force-matching and the flawed agency judgments characteristic of positive symptoms, including auditory hallucinations and delusions of control. OBJECTIVE: To assess attenuation of sensory processing by self-action in individuals with schizophrenia and its relation to current symptom severity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Functional magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired while medicated individuals with schizophrenia (n = 19) and matched controls (n = 19) performed a factorially designed sensorimotor task in which the occurrence and relative timing of action and sensation were manipulated. The study took place at the neuroimaging research unit at the Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, and the Maudsley Hospital. RESULTS: In controls, a region of secondary somatosensory cortex exhibited attenuated activation when sensation and action were synchronous compared with when the former occurred after an unexpected delay or alone. By contrast, reduced attenuation was observed in the schizophrenia group, suggesting that these individuals were unable to predict the sensory consequences of their own actions. Furthermore, failure to attenuate secondary somatosensory cortex processing was predicted by current hallucinatory severity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although comparably reduced attenuation has been reported in the verbal domain, this work implies that a more general physiologic deficit underlies positive symptoms of schizophrenia.
Authors: Rebecca E Watsky; Stephen J Gotts; Rebecca A Berman; Harrison M McAdams; Xueping Zhou; Dede Greenstein; Francois M Lalonde; Peter Gochman; Liv S Clasen; Lorie Shora; Anna E Ordóñez; Nitin Gogtay; Alex Martin; Deanna M Barch; Judith L Rapoport; Siyuan Liu Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Philip R Corlett; Guillermo Horga; Paul C Fletcher; Ben Alderson-Day; Katharina Schmack; Albert R Powers Journal: Trends Cogn Sci Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 20.229
Authors: Roberta Vastano; Alberto Inuggi; Claudia D Vargas; Gabriel Baud-Bovy; Marco Jacono; Thierry Pozzo Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Naomi S Kort; Judith M Ford; Brian J Roach; Handan Gunduz-Bruce; John H Krystal; Judith Jaeger; Robert M G Reinhart; Daniel H Mathalon Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 13.382