| Literature DB >> 24194974 |
Marjonneke J Mook-Kanamori1, Mohammed M El-Din Selim, Ahmed H Takiddin, Hala Al-Homsi, Khoulood A S Al-Mahmoud, Amina Al-Obaidli, Mahmoud A Zirie, Jillian Rowe, Wafaa Sekkal Gherbi, Omar M Chidiac, Sara Abdul Kader, Wadha A Al Muftah, Cindy McKeon, Karsten Suhre, Dennis O Mook-Kanamori.
Abstract
Background Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) have been shown to be a predictor of cardiovascular risk in Caucasian subjects. In this study we examine whether the existing reference values are useable for non-Caucasian ethnicities. Furthermore, we assessed whether gender and smoking affect AGEs. Methods AGEs were determined by a non-invasive method of skin auto-fluorescence (AF). AF was measured in 200 Arabs, 99 South Asians, 35 Filipinos and 14 subjects of other/mixed ethnicity in the Qatar Metabolomics Study on Diabetes (QMDiab). Using multivariate linear regression analysis and adjusting for age and type 2 diabetes, we assessed whether ethnicity, gender and smoking were associated with AF. Results The mean AF was 2.27 arbitrary units (AU) (SD: 0.63). Arabs and Filipinos had a significant higher AF than the South Asian population (0.25 arbitrary units (AU) (95% CI: 0.11‒0.39), p = 0.001 and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.13‒0.55), p = 0.001 respectively). Also, AF was significantly higher in females (0.41 AU (95% CI: 0.29‒0.53), p < 0.001). AF associated with smoking (0.21 AU (95% CI: 0.01‒0.41), p = 0.04) and increased with the number of pack-years smoked (p = 0.02). Conclusions This study suggests that the existing reference values should take ethnicity, gender and smoking into account. Larger studies in specific ethnicities are necessary to create ethnic- and gender-specific reference values.Entities:
Keywords: advanced glycation endproducts; epidemiology; ethnicity; gender differences; skin auto-fluorescence; smoking; type 2 diabetes
Year: 2013 PMID: 24194974 PMCID: PMC3772922 DOI: 10.4161/derm.26046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dermatoendocrinol ISSN: 1938-1972
Table 1. Subject characteristics
| Characteristics | Type 2 Diabetes | Non Type 2 Diabetes |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 54.0 (34.8–70.7) | 38.5 (23.3–62.5) |
| Gender (% female) | 75 (44.1%) | 98 (55.1%) |
| Ethnicity | | |
| Arab (%) | 85 (50.0%) | 115 (64.6%) |
| South Asian (%) | 65 (38.2%) | 34 (19.1%) |
| Filipino (%) | 13 (7.6%) | 22 (12.4%) |
| Other or mix (%) | 7 (4.1%) | 7 (3.9%) |
| Current smoking (% smoking) | 15 (8.8%) | 15 (8.4%) |
| Skin auto-fluorescence (AU) | 2.32 (1.57–3.72) | 2.05 (1.45–3.16) |
| Reflectance (%) | 8.81 (6.28–17.67) | 9.72 (6.46–18.31) |
Arab: Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen South Asian: India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka Values represent median (90% range) or number of subjects (%) AU: Arbitrary Units, i.e., the output units of the AGE reader.
Table 2. Subject characteristics stratified by ethnicity
| Characteristics | Arab n = 200 | South Asian n = 99 | Filipino n = 35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes | Non Type 2 Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes | Non Type 2 Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes | Non Type 2 Diabetes | |
| Age (years) | 53.9 (34.2–71.2) | 39.1 (22.6–64.4) | 52.6 (35.2–69.1) | 39.0 (25.0–57.6) | 49.3 (37.8–63.0) | 37.2 (23.2–57.8) |
| Gender (% female) | 51 (60.0%) | 70 (60.9%) | 11 (16.9%) | 13 (38.2%) | 11 (84.6%) | 13 (59.1%) |
| Smoking (%) | 8 (9.4%) | 10 (8.7%) | 6 (9.2%) | 2 (5.9%) | 1 (7.7%) | 2 (9.1%) |
| Skin AF (AU) | 2.64 (1.67–4.02) | 2.09 (1.47–3.31) | 1.90 (1.43–3.31) | 1.80 (1.36–2.59) | 2.56 (1.97–3.58) | 2.18 (1.62–3.37) |
| Reflectance (%) | 10.43 (6.47–22.02) | 10.54 (6.84–20.42) | 7.13 (6.21–10.54) | 7.82 (6.05–15.85) | 10.81 (8.16–15.05) | 9.41 (6.51–14.96) |
Arab: Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen South Asian: India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka. Values represent median (90% range) or number of subjects (%) AU: Arbitrary Units, i.e., the output units of the AGE reader.
Table 3. Subject characteristics stratified by gender
| Characteristics | Female n = 173 | Male n = 175 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes | Non Type 2 Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes | Non Type 2 Diabetes | |
| Age (years) | 52.6 (33.7–70.6) | 36.5 (19.5–61.2) | 54.4 (34.9–71.1) | 41.7 (25.9–64.3) |
| Ethnicity | | | | |
| Arab (%) | 51 (68.0%) | 70 (71.4%) | 34 (35.8%) | 45 (56.3%) |
| South Asian (%) | 11 (14.7%) | 13 (13.3%) | 54 (56.8%) | 21 (26.3%) |
| Filipino (%) | 11 (14.7%) | 13 (13.3%) | 2 (2.1%) | 9 (11.3%) |
| Other or mix (%) | 2 (2.7%) | 2 (2.0%) | 5 (5.3%) | 5 (6.3%) |
| Smoking (%) | 1 (1.3%) | 4 (4.1%) | 14 (14.7%) | 11 (13.8%) |
| Skin AF (AU) | 2.64 (1.77–3.95) | 2.11 (1.60–3.41) | 2.02 (1.49–3.51) | 1.85 (1.37–2.60) |
| Reflectance (%) | 9.91 (6.40–22.89) | 10.49 (6.73–22.85) | 7.90 (6.26–14.59) | 9.00 (6.28–14.51) |
Arab: Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen. South Asian: India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka. Values represent median (90% range) or number of subjects (%). AU: Arbitrary Units, i.e., the output units of the AGE reader.
Table 4. Factors related to skin auto-fluorescence (in arbitrary units) using multivariate analyses in all subjects and stratified by type 2 diabetes state
| Risk Factor | Effect size (CI) | P-value | Effect size (CI) | P-value | Effect size (CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All subjects, n = 348 | Type 2 Diabetes, n = 178 | Non Type 2 Diabetes, n = 170 | ||||
| Age (years) | 0.021 (0.016, 0.026) | < 0.001 | 0.023 (0.014, 0.033) | < 0.001 | 0.019 (0.014, 0.025) | < 0.001 |
| Gender (Female = reference) | -0.41 (-0.53, -0.29) | < 0.001 | -0.43 (-0.65, -0.21) | < 0.001 | -0.39 (-0.53, -0.25) | < 0.001 |
| Ethnicity (South Asians = reference) | | | | | | |
| Arabs | 0.25 (0.11, 0.39 | 0.001 | 0.30 (0.07, 0.52) | 0.01 | 0.20 (0.02, 0.37) | 0.03 |
| Filipinos | 0.34 (0.13, 0.55) | 0.001 | 0.31 (-0.08, 0.69) | 0.11 | 0.34 (0.11, 0.58) | 0.005 |
| Smoking (non-smoking = reference) | 0.21 (0.01, 0.41) | 0.04 | 0.30 (-0.03, 0.63) | 0.07 | 0.17 (-0.07, 0.42) | 0.16 |
| Diabetes (non-diabetic = reference) | 0.14 (0.01, 0.26) | 0.03 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Reflectance (%) | 0.84 (-0.59, 2.26) | 0.25 | -0.20 (-2.53, 2.13) | 0.87 | 1.79 (0.02, 3.56) | 0.05 |
Arab: Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen. South Asian: India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka. Values represent regression coefficients (95% confidence interval) and their corresponding p-values. For categorical or dichotomous variables, the effect estimates represent the difference in skin AF compared with the reference group.

Figure 1. Scatterplot of skin auto-fluorescence by age, stratified by ethnicity.
Table 5. Factors related to skin auto-fluorescence (in arbitrary units) using multivariate analyses stratified gender
| Risk Factor | Effect size (CI) | P-value | Effect size (CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males, n = 175 | Females, n = 173 | |||
| Age (years) | 0.023 (0.016, 0.033) | < 0.001 | 0.019 (0.012, 0.027) | < 0.001 |
| Ethnicity (South Asians = reference) | | | | |
| Arabs | 0.15 (-0.04, 0.33) | 0.11 | 0.30 (0.51, 0.55) | 0.02 |
| Filipinos | 0.35 (0.02, 0.68) | 0.04 | 0.33 (0.21, 0.65) | 0.04 |
| Smoking (non-smoking = reference) | 0.21 (0.00, 0.41) | 0.05 | 0.32 (-0.18, 0.81) | 0.21 |
| Diabetes (non-diabetic = reference) | 0.13 (-0.04, 0.30) | 0.13 | 0.16 (-0.04, 0.35) | 0.11 |
| Reflectance (%) | 3.42 (0.57, 6.27) | 0.02 | 0.15 (-1.59, 1.89) | 0.86 |
Arab: Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen. South Asian: India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka. Values represent regression coefficients (95% confidence interval) and their corresponding p-values. For categorical or dichotomous variables, the effect estimates represent the difference in skin AF compared with the reference group.

Figure 2. Scatterplot of skin auto-fluorescence by age, stratified by gender.
Table 6. Factors related to skin auto-fluorescence (in arbitrary units) using multivariate analyses stratified by ethnicity
| Risk Factor | Effect size (CI) | P-value | Effect size (CI) | P-value | Effect size (CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.016 (0.005, 0.026) | < 0.001 | 0.022 (0.016, 0.029) | < 0.001 | 0.018 (-0.001, 0.038) | 0.06 |
| Gender (Female = reference) | -0.26 (-0.51, -0.01) | 0.05 | -0.46 (-0.63, -0.29) | < 0.001 | -0.31 (-0.70, 0.08) | 0.11 |
| Smoking (non-smoking = reference) | 0.30 (-0.06, 0.65) | 0.10 | 0.23 (-0.05, 0.50) | 0.10 | N/A | N/A |
| Diabetes (non-diabetic = reference) | 0.18 (-0.05, 0.42) | 0.13 | 0.15 (-0.03, 0.32) | 0.10 | 0.05 (-0.39, 0.49) | 0.82 |
| Reflectance (%) | 6.59 (2.01, 11.17) | 0.005 | -0.03 (-1.69, 1.64) | 0.97 | 3.84 (-3.26, 10.93) | 0.28 |
Arab: Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen. South Asian: India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka. Values represent regression coefficients (95% confidence interval) and their corresponding p-values. For categorical or dichotomous variables, the effect estimates represent the difference in skin AF compared with the reference group. In the Filipino group there were only three smokers and therefore the variable was removed from the analyses.