| Literature DB >> 24194688 |
Eun-Jin Yang1, Young Min Ham, Kyong-Wol Yang, Nam Ho Lee, Chang-Gu Hyun.
Abstract
During our ongoing screening program designed to determine the anti-inflammatory potential of natural compounds, we isolated sargachromenol from Sargassum micracanthum. In the present study, we investigated the anti-inflammatory effects of sargachromenol on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation in murine RAW 264.7 macrophage cells and the underlying mechanisms. Sargachromenol significantly inhibited the LPS-induced production of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) in a dose-dependent manner. It also significantly inhibited the protein expression of inducible NO synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in a dose-dependent manner in LPS-stimulated macrophage cells. Further analyses showed that sargachromenol decreased the cytoplasmic loss of inhibitor κBα (IκBα) protein. These results suggest that sargachromenol may exert its anti-inflammatory effects on LPS-stimulated macrophage cells by inhibiting the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway. In conclusion, to our knowledge, this is the first study to show that sargachromenol isolated from S. micracanthum has an effective anti-inflammatory activity. Therefore, sargachromenol might be useful for cosmetic, food, or medical applications requiring anti-inflammatory properties.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24194688 PMCID: PMC3806450 DOI: 10.1155/2013/712303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Structures of sargachromenol (a) and sargaquinoic acid (b).
Figure 2Effect of sargachromenol on NO production in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Cells were stimulated with 1 μg/mL of LPS only or with LPS plus the indicated concentrations of SM for 24 h. NO (a) levels were determined by the Griess reagent method. PGE2 (b) levels were measured using an ELISA kit. The data represent the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus LPS alone. Cell viability was determined from the 24 h culture of cells stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) in the presence of SM. NO: nitric oxide; LPS: lipopolysaccharide; SM: sargachromenol; PGE2: prostaglandin E2; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Figure 3The effect of sargachromenol on the activation of iNOS (a) and COX-2 (b) in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. RAW 264.7 cells (5.0 × 105 cells/mL) were stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) in the presence of SM at the indicated concentrations for 24 h. Whole-cell lysates (25 μg) were prepared and subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE prior to the analysis of iNOS and β-actin (loading control) expression by Western blotting. iNOS: inducible nitric oxide synthase; COX-2: cyclooxygenase-2; LPS: lipopolysaccharide; SM: sargachromenol; SDS-PAGE: sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Figure 4The effects of sargachromenol on the degradation of IκBα in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. RAW 264.7 cells (1.0 × 106 cells/mL) were stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) in the presence of the indicated concentrations of SM or PDTC (40 μM) for 15 min. Whole-cell lysates (30 μg) were prepared and subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE prior to analysis of IκBα and β-actin (loading control) expression by western blotting. LPS: lipopolysaccharide; SM: sargachromenol; SDS-PAGE: sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PDTC: pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate.