Literature DB >> 24193978

Qualitative importance of the microbial loop and plankton community structure in a eutrophic lake during a bloom of cyanobacteria.

K Christoffersen1, B Riemann, L R Hansen, A Klysner, H B Sørensen.   

Abstract

Plankton community structure and major pools and fluxes of carbon were observed before and after culmination of a bloom of cyanobacteria in eutrophic Frederiksborg Slotssø, Denmark. Biomass changes of heterotrophic nanoflagellates, ciliates, microzooplankton (50 to 140 μm), and macrozooplankton (larger than 140 μm) were compared to phytoplankton and bacterial production as well as micro- and macrozooplankton ingestion rates of phytoplankton and bacteria. The carbon budget was used as a means to examine causal relationships in the plankton community. Phytoplankton biomass decreased and algae smaller than 20 μm replacedAphanizomenon after the culmination of cyanobacteria. Bacterial net production peaked shortly after the culmination of the bloom (510 μg C liter(-1) d(-1) and decreased thereafter to a level of approximately 124 μg C liter(-1) d(-1). Phytoplankton extracellular release of organic carbon accounted for only 4-9% of bacterial carbon demand. Cyclopoid copepods and small-sized cladocerans started to grow after the culmination, but food limitation probably controlled the biomass after the collapse of the bloom. Grazing of micro- and macrozooplankton were estimated from in situ experiments using labeled bacteria and algae. Macrozooplankton grazed 22% of bacterial net production during the bloom and 86% after the bloom, while microzooplankton (nauplii, rotifers and ciliates larger than 50 μm) ingested low amounts of bacteria and removed 10-16% of bacterial carbon. Both macro-and microzooplankton grazed algae smaller than 20 μm, although they did not control algal biomass. From calculated clearance rates it was found that heterotrophic nanoflagellates (40-440 ml(-1)) grazed 3-4% of the bacterial production, while ciliates smaller than 50 μm removed 19-39% of bacterial production, supporting the idea that ciliates are an important link between bacteria and higher trophic levels. During and after the bloom ofAphanizomenon, major fluxes of carbon between bacteria, ciliates and crustaceans were observed, and heterotrophic nanoflagellates played a minor role in the pelagic food web.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 24193978     DOI: 10.1007/BF02543881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  6 in total

1.  Calculation of cell production from [h]thymidine incorporation with freshwater bacteria.

Authors:  J D Smits; B Riemann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Potential importance of fish predation and zooplankton grazing on natural populations of freshwater bacteria.

Authors:  B Riemann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  The role of ciliated protozoa in pelagic freshwater ecosystems.

Authors:  J R Beaver; T L Crisman
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Bacterioplankton secondary production estimates for coastal waters of british columbia, antarctica, and california.

Authors:  J A Fuhrman; F Azam
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Morphology, flow regimes, and filtering rates of Daphnia, Ceriodaphnia, and Bosmina fed natural bacteria.

Authors:  Karen G Porter; Yvette S Feig; Elizabeth F Vetter
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  J E Hobbie; R J Daley; S Jasper
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.792

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  The effects of cyanobacterial exudates on bacterial growth and biodegradation of organic contaminants.

Authors:  A E Kirkwood; C Nalewajko; R R Fulthorpe
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Are cyanobacterial blooms trophic dead ends?

Authors:  Marie-Elodie Perga; Isabelle Domaizon; Jean Guillard; Valérie Hamelet; Orlane Anneville
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Coupling Between Heterotrophic Nanoflagellates and Bacteria in Fresh Waters: Does Latitude Make a Difference?

Authors:  Bianca T Segovia; Carolina D Domingues; Bianca R Meira; Fernando M Lansac-Toha; Paulina Fermani; Fernando Unrein; Lúcia M Lobão; Fabio Roland; Luiz F M Velho; Hugo Sarmento
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  Next-generation sequencing (NGS) for assessment of microbial water quality: current progress, challenges, and future opportunities.

Authors:  BoonFei Tan; Charmaine Ng; Jean Pierre Nshimyimana; Lay Leng Loh; Karina Y-H Gin; Janelle R Thompson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Spatial and temporal changes of parasitic chytrids of cyanobacteria.

Authors:  Mélanie Gerphagnon; Jonathan Colombet; Delphine Latour; Télesphore Sime-Ngando
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.