Literature DB >> 24193597

Simulation of marker-assisted selection utilizing linkage disequilibrium: the effects of several additional factors.

W Zhang1, C Smith.   

Abstract

Use was made of our published model and methods to investigate the effects of several additional factors on marker-assisted selection (MAS) utilizing linkage disequilibrium. The additional factors were: size of the sample used to estimate the marker quantitative trait locus (MQTL) association effects, the method used to estimate the MQTL effects, use of the average of the top MQTL estimates in selection rather than individual estimates, size of the selection population, and the crossing of duplicate selection lines to generate further linkage disequilibrium and further selection response. The average map distance between the quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and their nearest marker was 0.15 Morgans. Use of estimates of MQTL effects derived by least squares yielded smaller selection responses than estimates derived by mixed-model methods. Selection responses were also reduced by using a smaller sample for estimating the associations because MQTL effects were less well estimated. This applied to selection on the MQTL effects themselves and to selection combining the MQTL with phenotypic information. Thus, poorly estimated MQTL effects added noise to the system and reduced selection response in combined selection. Using the average of the top MQTL estimates, rather than individual estimates, also reduced selection response. New linkage disequilibrium, generated by crossing two lines selected from the same population, did not lead to additional selection response in the cross line. These results show limitations to MAS using linkage disequilibrium until close linkages of markers and QTLs are available.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 24193597     DOI: 10.1007/BF00838565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  5 in total

1.  Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T F Mackay; R F Lyman; M S Jackson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimation of effects of single genes on quantitative traits.

Authors:  B W Kennedy; M Quinton; J A van Arendonk
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Computer simulation of marker-assisted selection utilizing linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  W Zhang; C Smith
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits.

Authors:  R Lande; R Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Size of population required for artificial selection.

Authors:  F W Nicholas
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 1.588

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Marker-assisted selection in segregating generations of self-fertilizing crops.

Authors:  Pengyuan Liu; Jun Zhu; Yan Lu
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  A molecular selection index method based on eigenanalysis.

Authors:  J Jesús Cerón-Rojas; Fernando Castillo-González; Jaime Sahagún-Castellanos; Amalio Santacruz-Varela; Ignacio Benítez-Riquelme; José Crossa
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Marker-assisted selection and marker-QTL associations in hybrid populations.

Authors:  A Gimelfarb; R Lande
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 4.  The long (and winding) road to gene discovery for canine hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Lan Zhu; Zhiwu Zhang; Steven Friedenberg; Seung-Woo Jung; Janjira Phavaphutanon; Margaret Vernier-Singer; Elizabeth Corey; Raluca Mateescu; Nathan Dykes; Jody Sandler; Gregory Acland; George Lust; Rory Todhunter
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 2.688

5.  The statistical theory of linear selection indices from phenotypic to genomic selection.

Authors:  J Jesus Cerón-Rojas; Jose Crossa
Journal:  Crop Sci       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 2.763

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.