Literature DB >> 15069599

Marker-assisted selection in segregating generations of self-fertilizing crops.

Pengyuan Liu1, Jun Zhu, Yan Lu.   

Abstract

Computer simulations were used to study the efficiency of MAS for breeding self-fertilizing crops, based on a general model including additive, dominance and epistasis. It was shown that MAS not only gave larger genetic responses but also dramatically increased the frequencies of superior genotypes as compared with phenotypic selection. However, the advantages of MAS over phenotypic selection were considerably reduced when conducting selection in later generations. A modified method combining MAS in early generations with phenotypic selection in later generations was thus proposed from an efficiency standpoint. We also proposed a potential index to measure the probability of an individual showing superior genotypes under selfing. It was apparent that more superior genotypes could be derived from selection by using the potential index than by using other methods. The implications of these findings for plant breeding are discussed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15069599     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-004-1636-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  14 in total

1.  Efficient marker-based recurrent selection for multiple quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  F Hospital; I Goldringer; S Openshaw
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Marker-assisted introgression of favorable alleles at quantitative trait loci between maize elite lines.

Authors:  Agnès Bouchez; Frédéric Hospital; Mathilde Causse; André Gallais; Alain Charcosset
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A method for marker-assisted selection based on QTLs with epistatic effects.

Authors:  Pengyuan Liu; Jun Zhu; Xiangyang Lou; Yan Lu
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Some practical considerations for using RFLP markers to aid in selection during inbreeding of maize.

Authors:  B E Zehr; J W Dudley; J Chojecki
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits.

Authors:  R Lande; R Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Efficiency of multistage marker-assisted selection in the improvement of multiple quantitative traits.

Authors:  C Xie; S Xu
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Marker-assisted selection efficiency in populations of finite size.

Authors:  L Moreau; A Charcosset; F Hospital; A Gallais
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic response from marker assisted selection in an outbred population for differing marker bracket sizes and with two identified quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  R Spelman; H Bovenhuis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Simulation of marker assisted selection in hybrid populations.

Authors:  A Gimelfarb; R Lande
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Using marker-maps in marker-assisted selection.

Authors:  J C Whittaker; R N Curnow; C S Haley; R Thompson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  5 in total

1.  Selfing for the design of genomic selection experiments in biparental plant populations.

Authors:  Benjamin McClosky; Jason LaCombe; Steven D Tanksley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  'Ogura'-based 'CMS' lines with different nuclear backgrounds of cabbage revealed substantial diversity at morphological and molecular levels.

Authors:  Chander Parkash; Sandeep Kumar; Rajender Singh; Ajay Kumar; Satish Kumar; Shyam Sundar Dey; Reeta Bhatia; Raj Kumar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  QTL mapping for resistance against cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae Woll.) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  Saksham Pundir; Rajiv Sharma; Deepak Kumar; Vikas Kumar Singh; Deepti Chaturvedi; Rambir Singh Kanwar; Marion S Röder; Andreas Börner; Martin W Ganal; Pushpendra Kumar Gupta; Shailendra Sharma; Shiveta Sharma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  QTL, additive and epistatic effects for SCN resistance in PI 437654.

Authors:  Xiaolei Wu; Sean Blake; David A Sleper; J Grover Shannon; Perry Cregan; Henry T Nguyen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Population development by phenotypic selection with subsequent marker-assisted selection for line extraction in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).

Authors:  Zhicheng Fan; Matthew D Robbins; Jack E Staub
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 5.574

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.