Literature DB >> 24193294

Prognostic value of tumor volumetry data of routine imaging data in a head and neck cancer registry.

Daniela Oemus1, Johanna Inhestern, Harald Schmalenberg, Stefan Schultze-Mosgau, Hans-Joachim Mentzel, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of tumor volume (TV) measurements as prognosticator for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) from data of head and neck cancer (HNC) registries. TV measurements were performed in pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance images (MRI) of 392 unselected HNC patients. TV measurements were feasible in 275 patients (70 %). Median CT TV and MRI TV were 11.43 and 10.4 cm(3), respectively. The CT TV was significantly different only between T1 and T4. CT TV was significantly different only between T1 and T4 (p = 0.041). MRI TV was significantly different between T1 and T4 (p = 0.003) as well as between T2 and T4 (p = 0.002). Median follow-up was 26.1 months. Median RFS was 80.7 months. Median OS was 66.5 months. On univariate analysis, significant prognostic factors for decreased RFS were advanced T stage (p = 0.010); M1 (p = 0.001) and an MRI TV > 10.4 cm(3) (p = 0.001). Significant prognostic factors for a decreased OS were advanced T stage (p = 0.001), N+ (p = 0 006), M+ (p < 0.001), tumor recurrence (p < 0.001), CT TV (p = 0.005), and MRI TV (p = 0.012). On multivariate analysis for RFS, MRI TV was the best independent prognosticator (p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis for OS, T stage (p = 0.006) was a better prognosticator than CT or MRI TV. Using CT and MRI data sets of an unselected series of HNC patients in a cancer registry, TV measurements were not feasible in all patients. MRT TV was a powerful prognosticator for RFS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24193294     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2800-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  17 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging vs palpation of cervical lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  M W van den Brekel; J A Castelijns; G A Croll; H V Stel; J Valk; I van der Waal; R P Golding; C J Meyer; G B Snow
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1991-06

2.  Lymph node staging in patients with clinically negative neck examinations by ultrasound and ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology.

Authors:  M W van den Brekel; H V Stel; J A Castelijns; G J Croll; G B Snow
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Occult regional metastasis: carcinoma of the oral tongue.

Authors:  J G Lee; W B Litton
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in oropharyngeal carcinoma: effect of tumor volume on clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Benjamin H Lok; Jeremy Setton; Nicola Caria; Jonathan Romanyshyn; Suzanne L Wolden; Michael J Zelefsky; Jeffery Park; Nicholas Rowan; Eric J Sherman; Matthew G Fury; Alan Ho; David G Pfister; Richard J Wong; Jatin P Shah; Dennis H Kraus; Zhigang Zhang; Karen D Schupak; Daphna Y Gelblum; Shyam D Rao; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Reliability of CT-based tumor volumetry after intraarterial chemotherapy in patients with small carcinoma of the oral cavity and the oropharynx.

Authors:  Stefan Rohde; Adorján F Kovács; Joachim Berkefeld; Bernd Turowski
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology in the staging of neck lymph nodes in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S C Hodder; R M Evans; D W Patton; K C Silvester
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.651

7.  Semi-automated primary tumor volume measurements by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Wouter L Lodder; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs; Charlotte A H Lange; Frank A Pameijer; Alfons J M Balm; Michiel W M van den Brekel
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Carcinoma of the larynx: the Dutch national guideline for diagnostics, treatment, supportive care and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Johannes H A M Kaanders; Gerrit Jan Hordijk
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Volumetric staging (VS) is superior to TNM and AJCC staging in predicting outcome of head and neck cancer treated with IMRT.

Authors:  G Studer; U M Lütolf; M El-Bassiouni; V Rousson; C Glanzmann
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.089

10.  Tumor volume predicts outcome for advanced head and neck cancer treated with targeted chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Ilana Doweck; Douglas Denys; K Thomas Robbins
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  2 in total

1.  Specific growth rates calculated from CTs in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study performed in Austria.

Authors:  Daniel Dejaco; Teresa Steinbichler; Volker Hans Schartinger; Natalie Fischer; Maria Anegg; Joszef Dudas; Andrea Posch; Gerlig Widmann; Herbert Riechelmann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Approximation of head and neck cancer volumes in contrast enhanced CT.

Authors:  D Dejaco; C Url; V H Schartinger; A K Haug; N Fischer; D Riedl; A Posch; H Riechelmann; G Widmann
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.909

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.