Literature DB >> 2036191

Magnetic resonance imaging vs palpation of cervical lymph node metastasis.

M W van den Brekel1, J A Castelijns, G A Croll, H V Stel, J Valk, I van der Waal, R P Golding, C J Meyer, G B Snow.   

Abstract

In a series of 100 patients with head and neck carcinoma, the preoperative histopathologic findings of palpation and magnetic resonance imaging were compared with regard to both laterality and lymph node level (I through V). The overall error for palpation in detecting affected sides was 32%. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance images reliably upgraded 60% of the clinically negative necks, the overall error of magnetic resonance imaging being 16%. However, for both modalities, the sensitivity per level was too low to allow for selective neck dissections in case of only one positive level. These findings show that apart from primary tumor grading, magnetic resonance imaging can improve the preoperative grading of cervical lymph nodes. In selected cases, this may change the treatment plan to a "wait-and-see" policy or a more conservative type of neck dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2036191     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870180102020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  13 in total

Review 1.  Management of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  G B Snow; P Patel; C R Leemans; R Tiwari
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  The evolution of nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging.

Authors:  Rui Guo; Yan-Ping Mao; Ling-Long Tang; Lei Chen; Ying Sun; Jun Ma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Neck dissection alternatives.

Authors:  R M Tiwari
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-10

4.  Comparison of the efficacy of clinical examination, ultrasound neck and computed tomography in detection and staging of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Nitin Anand; Neena Chaudhary; M K Mittal; Rajni Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-04-26

5.  Modern imaging techniques and ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology for the assessment of neck node metastases: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  M W van den Brekel; J A Castelijns; H V Stel; R P Golding; C J Meyer; G B Snow
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Current perspectives in the use of monoclonal antibodies for detection and treatment of head and neck tumors.

Authors:  J Quak; G van Dongen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Prognostic value of tumor volumetry data of routine imaging data in a head and neck cancer registry.

Authors:  Daniela Oemus; Johanna Inhestern; Harald Schmalenberg; Stefan Schultze-Mosgau; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  [Value of 18F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in radiotherapy planning of head-neck tumors].

Authors:  A N Rahn; R P Baum; I A Adamietz; S Adams; S Sengupta; S Mose; S B Bormeth; G Hör; H D Böttcher
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Occult node metastases in head and neck squamous carcinoma.

Authors:  A S Jones; D E Phillips; T R Helliwell; N J Roland
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Assessment of metastatic cervical adenopathy using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Nancy J Fischbein; Susan M Noworolski; Roland G Henry; Michael J Kaplan; William P Dillon; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.