Literature DB >> 24192489

First-trimester contingent screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by biomarkers and maternal blood cell-free DNA testing.

K H Nicolaides1, A Syngelaki, L C Poon, M M Gil, D Wright.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine potential performance of screening for trisomies by cell-free (cf) DNA testing in maternal blood contingent on results of first-line testing by combinations of fetal translucency thickness (NT), fetal heart rate (FHR), ductus venosus pulsatility index (DV PIV), and serum-free β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), placental growth factor (PLGF) and α-fetoprotein (AFP).
METHODS: Performance was estimated for firstly, screening by cfDNA in all pregnancies and secondly, cfDNA testing contingent on results of first-line testing by combinations of ultrasound and biochemical markers.
RESULTS: In first-line screening by cfDNA testing, the detection rate for trisomy 21 and trisomies 18 or 13 would be 99 and 96%, respectively, after invasive testing in 1% of the population. In contingent screening, a detection rate of 98% for trisomy 21 and 96% for trisomy 18 or 13, at an invasive testing rate of 0.7%, can be achieved by carrying out cfDNA testing in about 35, 20 and 11% of cases identified by first-line screening with the combined test alone (age, NT, FHR, β-hCG, PAPP-A), the combined test plus PLGF and AFP and the combined test plus PLGF, AFP and DV PIV, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Effective first-trimester screening for trisomies can be achieved by contingent screening incorporating biomarkers and cfDNA testing.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24192489     DOI: 10.1159/000356066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1015-3837            Impact factor:   2.587


  9 in total

Review 1.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 2.  Prenatal screening for structural congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Lindsey E Hunter; John M Simpson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  The Relationship of Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein A and Human Chorionic Gonadotropin with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Hamideh Pakniat; Atieh Bahman; Iman Ansari
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-04-11

4.  Influence of place of residence on indications for genetic amniocentesis in the Pomeranian region of Poland before and after introduction of the Prenatal Screening Program in 2008.

Authors:  Katarzyna Ciach; Małgorzata Swiatkowska-Freund; Krzysztof Preis
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-05-02

Review 5.  Down syndrome: A curative prospect?

Authors:  Jean A Rondal
Journal:  AIMS Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-22

Review 6.  Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Using Cell Free DNA in Maternal Plasma: Recent Developments and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Peter Benn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Explore the dynamic alternation of gene PLAC4 mRNA expression levels in maternal plasma in second trimester for nonivasive detection of trisomy 21.

Authors:  Lan Yang; Hai-Yan Sun; Dao-Zhen Chen; Mu-Dan Lu; Ye Tang; Jian-Pin Xiao
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2015-07-16

Review 8.  Prenatal Screening Using Maternal Markers.

Authors:  Howard Cuckle
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Application of an individualized nomogram in first-trimester screening for trisomy 21.

Authors:  Y Sun; L Zhang; D Dong; X Li; J Wang; C Yin; L C Poon; J Tian; Q Wu
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 7.299

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.