Literature DB >> 24190955

Using benefit-based tailored treatment to improve the use of antihypertensive medications.

Jeremy Sussman1, Sandeep Vijan, Rod Hayward.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for prescribing antihypertensive medications focus on reaching specific blood pressure targets. We sought to determine whether antihypertensive medications could be used more effectively by a treatment strategy based on tailored estimates of cardiovascular disease events prevented. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We developed a nationally representative sample of American adults aged 30 to 85 years with no history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or severe congestive heart failure using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. We then created a simulation model to estimate the effects of 5 years of treatment with treat-to-target (treatment to specific blood pressure goals) and benefit-based tailored treatment (treatment based on estimated cardiovascular disease event reduction) approaches to antihypertensive medication management. All effect size estimates were derived directly from meta-analyses of randomized trials. We found that 55% of the overall population of 176 million Americans would be treated identically under the 2 treatment approaches. Benefit-based tailored treatment would prevent 900 000 more cardiovascular disease events and save 2.8 million more quality-adjusted life-years, despite using 6% fewer medications over 5 years. In the 45% of the population treated differently by the strategies, benefit-based tailored treatment would save 159 quality-adjusted life-years per 1000 treated versus 74 quality-adjusted life-years per 1000 treated by the treat-to-target approach. The findings were robust to sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that benefit-based tailored treatment was both more effective and required less antihypertensive medication than current guidelines based on treating to specific blood pressure goals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; hypertension; primary prevention; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24190955      PMCID: PMC4026201          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  38 in total

1.  Prediction of benefit from carotid endarterectomy in individual patients: a risk-modelling study. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors:  P M Rothwell; C P Warlow
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Individual and population benefits of daily aspirin therapy: a proposal for personalizing national guidelines.

Authors:  Jeremy B Sussman; Sandeep Vijan; HwaJung Choi; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-04-12

3.  Assessing appropriateness of lipid management among patients with diabetes mellitus: moving from target to treatment.

Authors:  Ashley J Beard; Timothy P Hofer; John R Downs; Michelle Lucatorto; Mandi L Klamerus; Rob Holleman; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-12-11

4.  Variation in the net benefit of aggressive cardiovascular risk factor control across the US population of patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Justin W Timbie; Rodney A Hayward; Sandeep Vijan
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-28

5.  Individualized guidelines: the potential for increasing quality and reducing costs.

Authors:  David M Eddy; Joshua Adler; Bradley Patterson; Don Lucas; Kurt A Smith; Macdonald Morris
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Optimizing statin treatment for primary prevention of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Rodney A Hayward; Harlan M Krumholz; Donna M Zulman; Justin W Timbie; Sandeep Vijan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  An independently derived and validated predictive model for selecting patients with myocardial infarction who are likely to benefit from tissue plasminogen activator compared with streptokinase.

Authors:  David M Kent; Rodney A Hayward; John L Griffith; Sandeep Vijan; Joni R Beshansky; Robert M Califf; Harry P Selker
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials.

Authors:  Colin Baigent; Lisa Blackwell; Rory Collins; Jonathan Emberson; Jon Godwin; Richard Peto; Julie Buring; Charles Hennekens; Patricia Kearney; Tom Meade; Carlo Patrono; Maria Carla Roncaglioni; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies.

Authors:  M R Law; J K Morris; N J Wald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-05-19

10.  Validation of prediction of diabetes by the Archimedes model and comparison with other predicting models.

Authors:  Michael Stern; Ken Williams; David Eddy; Richard Kahn
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  37 in total

1.  Matching Microsimulation Risk Factor Correlations to Cross-sectional Data: The Shortest Distance Method.

Authors:  Sze-Chuan Suen; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Sanjay Basu
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Personalizing Second-Line Type 2 Diabetes Treatment Selection: Combining Network Meta-analysis, Individualized Risk, and Patient Preferences for Unified Decision Support.

Authors:  Sung Eun Choi; Seth A Berkowitz; John S Yudkin; Huseyin Naci; Sanjay Basu
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Potential US Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Robert M Carey; Samuel Gidding; Daniel W Jones; Sandra J Taler; Jackson T Wright; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Potential U.S. Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Robert M Carey; Samuel Gidding; Daniel W Jones; Sandra J Taler; Jackson T Wright; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Cost-effectiveness of hypertension therapy according to 2014 guidelines.

Authors:  Andrew E Moran; Michelle C Odden; Anusorn Thanataveerat; Keane Y Tzong; Petra W Rasmussen; David Guzman; Lawrence Williams; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Pamela G Coxson; Lee Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Using Predicted Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Conjunction With Blood Pressure to Guide Antihypertensive Medication Treatment.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Income Disparities in Absolute Cardiovascular Risk and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the United States, 1999-2014.

Authors:  Ayodele Odutayo; Peter Gill; Shaun Shepherd; Aquila Akingbade; Sally Hopewell; Karthik Tennankore; Benjamin H Hunn; Connor A Emdin
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

8.  Clinic-Based Strategies to Reach United States Million Hearts 2022 Blood Pressure Control Goals.

Authors:  Brandon K Bellows; Natalia Ruiz-Negrón; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Jordan B King; Mark J Pletcher; Andrew E Moran; Valy Fontil
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-06-05

9.  Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jeff D Williamson; Mark A Supiano; William B Applegate; Dan R Berlowitz; Ruth C Campbell; Glenn M Chertow; Larry J Fine; William E Haley; Amret T Hawfield; Joachim H Ix; Dalane W Kitzman; John B Kostis; Marie A Krousel-Wood; Lenore J Launer; Suzanne Oparil; Carlos J Rodriguez; Christianne L Roumie; Ronald I Shorr; Kaycee M Sink; Virginia G Wadley; Paul K Whelton; Jeffrey Whittle; Nancy F Woolard; Jackson T Wright; Nicholas M Pajewski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Estimating Longitudinal Risks and Benefits From Cardiovascular Preventive Therapies Among Medicare Patients: The Million Hearts Longitudinal ASCVD Risk Assessment Tool: A Special Report From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology.

Authors:  Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Mark D Huffman; Kunal N Karmali; Darshak M Sanghavi; Janet S Wright; Colleen Pelser; Martha Gulati; Frederick A Masoudi; David C Goff
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.