Literature DB >> 12133748

An independently derived and validated predictive model for selecting patients with myocardial infarction who are likely to benefit from tissue plasminogen activator compared with streptokinase.

David M Kent1, Rodney A Hayward, John L Griffith, Sandeep Vijan, Joni R Beshansky, Robert M Califf, Harry P Selker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and tPA for Occluded coronary arteries (GUSTO) trial, patients with myocardial infarction who were treated with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) had a 6.3% 30-day mortality, compared with a mortality of 7.3% among those treated with streptokinase, despite a greater risk of intracranial hemorrhage with tPA. However, in part because of its higher cost, tPA has not been adopted universally.
METHODS: Using an independently developed model, we predicted the benefits of tPA therapy in the 24,146 patients in the GUSTO trial and compared these predictions with the actual benefits of tPA, after classifying patients by their risks of mortality and intracranial hemorrhage. We also performed a "patient-specific" cost-effectiveness analysis among different strata of expected benefit of tPA.
RESULTS: Our model predicted that among patients with myocardial infarction, 61% of the benefit of tPA use in reducing mortality accrued to only 25% of patients; treating half of patients could capture 85% of the benefit. Including the risk of intracranial hemorrhage, our model predicted that treating half the GUSTO patients with tPA and the others with streptokinase would yield similar outcomes as treating all patients with tPA, because the additional risk of intracranial hemorrhage exceeded the expected benefit in some patients. When patients were stratified into quartiles of risk, the observed outcomes in the GUSTO patients corresponded well with these predicted results. The estimated cost-effectiveness of tPA was sensitive to patient characteristics.
CONCLUSION: For selected patients, use of tPA yields substantially better outcomes than streptokinase, and use of the less expensive agent is difficult to justify. For many patients, however, tPA is unlikely to provide any additional benefit and, in some patients, it may even cause net harm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12133748     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01160-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  29 in total

1.  The relative merits of population-based and targeted prevention strategies.

Authors:  Donna M Zulman; Sandeep Vijan; Gilbert S Omenn; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 2.  Personalized evidence based medicine: predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects.

Authors:  David M Kent; Ewout Steyerberg; David van Klaveren
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-12-10

3.  Is primary angioplasty for some as good as primary angioplasty for all?

Authors:  David M Kent; Christopher H Schmid; Joseph Lau; Harry P Selker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Random treatment assignment using mathematical equipoise for comparative effectiveness trials.

Authors:  Harry P Selker; Robin Ruthazer; Norma Terrin; John L Griffith; Thomas Concannon; David M Kent
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.

Authors:  Min Qian; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.028

6.  Against diagnosis.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Ethan Basch; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Subgroup analyses in randomized controlled trials: the need for risk stratification in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  M Wagner; E M Balk; D M Kent; B L Kasiske; H Ekberg
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Using benefit-based tailored treatment to improve the use of antihypertensive medications.

Authors:  Jeremy Sussman; Sandeep Vijan; Rod Hayward
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Using internally developed risk models to assess heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials.

Authors:  James F Burke; Rodney A Hayward; Jason P Nelson; David M Kent
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-01-14

10.  Dealing with heterogeneity of treatment effects: is the literature up to the challenge?

Authors:  Nicole B Gabler; Naihua Duan; Diana Liao; Joann G Elmore; Theodore G Ganiats; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.