OBJECTIVES: A general population job-exposure matrix (GPJEM) including physical and psychosocial demands as well as psychosocial resources applicable to older and retired workers was developed. Its validity was evaluated by examining associations of physical demands and iso-strain (combination of high psychosocial demands and low resources) with health. METHODS: Physical and psychosocial work exposures reported by 55-64 year olds were derived from the Netherlands Working Conditions Survey and linked to the Netherlands Standard Classification of Occupations 1992. A GPJEM with low, moderate, and high probability of exposure to demands and resources was developed. To examine associations with health, two groups of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam were selected: current (i.e. at the time of the interview, 55-64 years) and former workers (55-84 years). Linear and logistic regression models were applied. RESULTS: Use of force and work in uncomfortable positions were significantly associated with functional limitations and self-perceived health (SPH), but not hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA), in current and former workers. A moderate probability of repetitive movements was associated with functional limitations in former workers. A high probability of repetitive movements was associated with functional limitations in current and former workers as well as with SPH and hip and knee OA in former workers. Respondents formerly exposed to iso-strain had significantly higher diastolic blood pressure and more often hypertension. No such associations were found in current workers. No association was found with cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that our GPJEM accurately classifies jobs according to physical demands and, although less clearly, iso-strain.
OBJECTIVES: A general population job-exposure matrix (GPJEM) including physical and psychosocial demands as well as psychosocial resources applicable to older and retired workers was developed. Its validity was evaluated by examining associations of physical demands and iso-strain (combination of high psychosocial demands and low resources) with health. METHODS: Physical and psychosocial work exposures reported by 55-64 year olds were derived from the Netherlands Working Conditions Survey and linked to the Netherlands Standard Classification of Occupations 1992. A GPJEM with low, moderate, and high probability of exposure to demands and resources was developed. To examine associations with health, two groups of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam were selected: current (i.e. at the time of the interview, 55-64 years) and former workers (55-84 years). Linear and logistic regression models were applied. RESULTS: Use of force and work in uncomfortable positions were significantly associated with functional limitations and self-perceived health (SPH), but not hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA), in current and former workers. A moderate probability of repetitive movements was associated with functional limitations in former workers. A high probability of repetitive movements was associated with functional limitations in current and former workers as well as with SPH and hip and knee OA in former workers. Respondents formerly exposed to iso-strain had significantly higher diastolic blood pressure and more often hypertension. No such associations were found in current workers. No association was found with cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that our GPJEM accurately classifies jobs according to physical demands and, although less clearly, iso-strain.
Entities:
Keywords:
job-exposure matrix; older workers; physical demands; psychosocial work demands and resources
Authors: Cécile R L Boot; Dorly J H Deeg; Tineke Abma; Kelly J Rijs; Suzan van der Pas; Theo G van Tilburg; Allard J van der Beek Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2014-09
Authors: Annemette Coop Svane-Petersen; Anders Holm; Hermann Burr; Elisabeth Framke; Maria Melchior; Naja Hulvej Rod; Børge Sivertsen; Stephen Stansfeld; Jeppe Karl Sørensen; Marianna Virtanen; Reiner Rugulies; Ida E H Madsen Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Svetlana Solovieva; Tiina Pensola; Johanna Kausto; Rahman Shiri; Markku Heliövaara; Alex Burdorf; Kirsti Husgafvel-Pursiainen; Eira Viikari-Juntura Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ann Marie Dale; Christine C Ekenga; Skye Buckner-Petty; Linda Merlino; Matthew S Thiese; Stephen Bao; Alysha Rose Meyers; Carisa Harris-Adamson; Jay Kapellusch; Ellen A Eisen; Fred Gerr; Kurt T Hegmann; Barbara Silverstein; Arun Garg; David Rempel; Angelique Zeringue; Bradley A Evanoff Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Jenni Ervasti; Olli Pietiläinen; Ossi Rahkonen; Eero Lahelma; Anne Kouvonen; Tea Lallukka; Minna Mänty Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Marcus Yung; Bradley A Evanoff; Skye Buckner-Petty; Yves Roquelaure; Alexis Descatha; Ann Marie Dale Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Cécile R L Boot; Anja Th C M de Kruif; William S Shaw; Allard J van der Beek; Dorly J Deeg; Tineke Abma Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2016-06
Authors: Emiel O Hoogendijk; Dorly J H Deeg; Jan Poppelaars; Marleen van der Horst; Marjolein I Broese van Groenou; Hannie C Comijs; H Roeline W Pasman; Natasja M van Schoor; Bianca Suanet; Fleur Thomése; Theo G van Tilburg; Marjolein Visser; Martijn Huisman Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2016-08-20 Impact factor: 8.082