Literature DB >> 24190611

Quality of images acquired with and without grid in digital mammography.

Khaled H Al Khalifah1, Ajit Brindhaban, Raed A Saeed.   

Abstract

In this study, we assessed the quality of digital mammography images acquired with a grid and without a grid for different kVp values. A digital mammography system was used for acquisition of images of the CIRS Model 015 Mammography Accreditation Phantom. The images were obtained in the presence of the grid and then with the grid removed from the system. The energy of the X-rays was varied between 26 and 32 kVp. The images were evaluated by five senior radiologic technologists with extensive experience in mammography. Statistical analysis was carried out with the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test with the level of significance set at p = 0.05. The comparison between images obtained with a grid and without a grid indicated that, for the visibility of fibers, the non-grid images at 28 kVp were significantly (p = 0.032) better than the images acquired with a grid. At all other kVp values, the images were not statistically different regarding the visibility of fibers. For the visibility of specks and masses, the images did not show any significant differences at any of the kVp values of the study. Imaging with kVp higher than 30 requires a grid to improve the visibility of fibrous calcifications and specks. For the visibility of masses at 32 kVp, no statistically significant differences between the grid and non-grid images were found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24190611     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-013-0238-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  8 in total

Review 1.  Screen-film and digital mammography. Image quality and radiation dose considerations.

Authors:  A G Haus; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice.

Authors:  Eric A Berns; R Edward Hendrick; Gary R Cutter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  X-ray scattering in full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Kirsi Nykänen; Samuli Siltanen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Effect of scatter and an antiscatter grid on the performance of a slot-scanning digital mammography system.

Authors:  Sam Z Shen; Aili K Bloomquist; Gord E Mawdsley; Martin J Yaffe; Idris Elbakri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Effect of dose reduction on the ability of digital mammography to detect simulated microcalcifications.

Authors:  Mari Yakabe; Shuji Sakai; Hidetake Yabuuchi; Yoshio Matsuo; Takeshi Kamitani; Taro Setoguchi; Mayumi Cho; Masafumi Masuda; Masayuki Sasaki
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Current state of digital mammography.

Authors:  Akihiko Shiraishi
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.239

7.  Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Stephen H Taplin; Patricia A Carney; Linn Abraham; Edward A Sickles; Carl D'Orsi; Eric A Berns; Gary Cutter; R Edward Hendrick; William E Barlow; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A comparison of the effectiveness of 28 kV (grid) versus 25 kV (no grid) mammographic techniques for breast screening.

Authors:  R M Warren; S Duffy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.039

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.