OBJECTIVES: To compare the potency, toxicity and mechanism of action of multiple histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) in activating HIV production from latency. DESIGN: In-vitro analysis of HDACi in a primary T-cell model of HIV latency and latently infected cell lines. METHODS: Latently infected chemokine ligand 19 (CCL19)-treated CD4⁺ T cells and the latently infected cell lines ACH2 and J-Lat were treated with a panel of HDACi, including entinostat, vorinostat, panonbinostat and MCT3. Viral production and cell viability were compared. Expression of cellular HDACs was measured by western blot and PCR. Association of HDACs with the HIV long-terminal repeat (LTR) using latently infected CCL19-treated primary CD4⁺ T cells in the presence and absence of specific HDACi was determined by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). RESULTS: We demonstrated considerable variation in the potency and toxicity of HDACi in latently infected primary CD4⁺ T cells and cell lines. All HDACi tested activated HIV production in latently infected primary T cells with greatest potency demonstrated with entinostat and vorinostat and greatest toxicity with panobinostat. Following the addition of HDACi in vitro, there were no changes in markers of T-cell activation or expression of the HIV coreceptors chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 (CXCR4) or chemokine (C-C motif) receptor type 5 (CCR5). ChIP analysis of latently infected CCL19-treated primary CD4⁺ T cells showed binding by HDAC1, HDAC2 and HDAC3 to the LTR with removal of HDAC1 and HDAC2 following treatment with the HDACi vorinostat and HDAC1 only following treatment with entinostat. CONCLUSION: The HDACi entinostat, selective for inhibition of class I HDACs, induced virus expression in latently infected primary CD4⁺ T cells making this compound an attractive novel option for future clinical trials.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the potency, toxicity and mechanism of action of multiple histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) in activating HIV production from latency. DESIGN: In-vitro analysis of HDACi in a primary T-cell model of HIV latency and latently infected cell lines. METHODS: Latently infected chemokine ligand 19 (CCL19)-treated CD4⁺ T cells and the latently infected cell lines ACH2 and J-Lat were treated with a panel of HDACi, including entinostat, vorinostat, panonbinostat and MCT3. Viral production and cell viability were compared. Expression of cellular HDACs was measured by western blot and PCR. Association of HDACs with the HIV long-terminal repeat (LTR) using latently infected CCL19-treated primary CD4⁺ T cells in the presence and absence of specific HDACi was determined by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). RESULTS: We demonstrated considerable variation in the potency and toxicity of HDACi in latently infected primary CD4⁺ T cells and cell lines. All HDACi tested activated HIV production in latently infected primary T cells with greatest potency demonstrated with entinostat and vorinostat and greatest toxicity with panobinostat. Following the addition of HDACi in vitro, there were no changes in markers of T-cell activation or expression of the HIV coreceptors chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 (CXCR4) or chemokine (C-C motif) receptor type 5 (CCR5). ChIP analysis of latently infected CCL19-treated primary CD4⁺ T cells showed binding by HDAC1, HDAC2 and HDAC3 to the LTR with removal of HDAC1 and HDAC2 following treatment with the HDACi vorinostat and HDAC1 only following treatment with entinostat. CONCLUSION: The HDACi entinostat, selective for inhibition of class I HDACs, induced virus expression in latently infected primary CD4⁺ T cells making this compound an attractive novel option for future clinical trials.
Authors: Janet D Siliciano; Joleen Kajdas; Diana Finzi; Thomas C Quinn; Karen Chadwick; Joseph B Margolick; Colin Kovacs; Stephen J Gange; Robert F Siliciano Journal: Nat Med Date: 2003-05-18 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Sifei Xing; Cynthia K Bullen; Neeta S Shroff; Liang Shan; Hung-Chih Yang; Jordyn L Manucci; Shridhar Bhat; Hao Zhang; Joseph B Margolick; Thomas C Quinn; David M Margolis; Janet D Siliciano; Robert F Siliciano Journal: J Virol Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Nancie M Archin; Kara S Keedy; Amy Espeseth; Herbert Dang; Daria J Hazuda; David M Margolis Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-09-10 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Nicolas Chomont; Mohamed El-Far; Petronela Ancuta; Lydie Trautmann; Francesco A Procopio; Bader Yassine-Diab; Geneviève Boucher; Mohamed-Rachid Boulassel; Georges Ghattas; Jason M Brenchley; Timothy W Schacker; Brenna J Hill; Daniel C Douek; Jean-Pierre Routy; Elias K Haddad; Rafick-Pierre Sékaly Journal: Nat Med Date: 2009-06-21 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Steven G Deeks; Sharon R Lewin; Anna Laura Ross; Jintanat Ananworanich; Monsef Benkirane; Paula Cannon; Nicolas Chomont; Daniel Douek; Jeffrey D Lifson; Ying-Ru Lo; Daniel Kuritzkes; David Margolis; John Mellors; Deborah Persaud; Joseph D Tucker; Françoise Barre-Sinoussi; Galit Alter; Judith Auerbach; Brigitte Autran; Dan H Barouch; Georg Behrens; Marina Cavazzana; Zhiwei Chen; Éric A Cohen; Giulio Maria Corbelli; Serge Eholié; Nir Eyal; Sarah Fidler; Laurindo Garcia; Cynthia Grossman; Gail Henderson; Timothy J Henrich; Richard Jefferys; Hans-Peter Kiem; Joseph McCune; Keymanthri Moodley; Peter A Newman; Monique Nijhuis; Moses Supercharger Nsubuga; Melanie Ott; Sarah Palmer; Douglas Richman; Asier Saez-Cirion; Matthew Sharp; Janet Siliciano; Guido Silvestri; Jerome Singh; Bruno Spire; Jeffrey Taylor; Martin Tolstrup; Susana Valente; Jan van Lunzen; Rochelle Walensky; Ira Wilson; Jerome Zack Journal: Nat Med Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Christine A Marian; Mateusz Stoszko; Lili Wang; Matthew W Leighty; Elisa de Crignis; Chad A Maschinot; Jovylyn Gatchalian; Benjamin C Carter; Basudev Chowdhury; Diana C Hargreaves; Jeremy R Duvall; Gerald R Crabtree; Tokameh Mahmoudi; Emily C Dykhuizen Journal: Cell Chem Biol Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 8.116
Authors: Melissa J Churchill; Daniel J Cowley; Steve L Wesselingh; Paul R Gorry; Lachlan R Gray Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: Kasper L Jønsson; Martin Tolstrup; Johan Vad-Nielsen; Kathrine Kjær; Anders Laustsen; Morten N Andersen; Thomas A Rasmussen; Ole S Søgaard; Lars Østergaard; Paul W Denton; Martin R Jakobsen Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Talia M Mota; Chase D McCann; Ali Danesh; Szu-Han Huang; Dean B Magat; Yanqin Ren; Louise Leyre; Tracy D Bui; Thomas M Rohwetter; Colin M Kovacs; Erika Benko; Lynsay MacLaren; Avery Wimpelberg; Christopher M Cannon; W David Hardy; Jeffrey T Safrit; R Brad Jones Journal: J Virol Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Lachlan R Gray; Hung On; Emma Roberts; Hao K Lu; Michael A Moso; Jacqueline A Raison; Catherine Papaioannou; Wan-Jung Cheng; Anne M Ellett; Jonathan C Jacobson; Damian F J Purcell; Steve L Wesselingh; Paul R Gorry; Sharon R Lewin; Melissa J Churchill Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: Amanda B Macedo; Camille L Novis; Caroline M De Assis; Eric S Sorensen; Paula Moszczynski; Szu-Han Huang; Yanqin Ren; Adam M Spivak; R Brad Jones; Vicente Planelles; Alberto Bosque Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2018-10-04
Authors: G Martrus; A Niehrs; R Cornelis; A Rechtien; W García-Beltran; M Lütgehetmann; C Hoffmann; M Altfeld Journal: J Virol Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 5.103