Are we asking the right question about postacute settings of care?

This issue of Archives includes an article by Mallinson et al that compares the outcomes of patients with hip fracture who received rehabilitation services in 3 different postacute settings: skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, or home health. Except in 1 instance, Mallinson found no setting-specific effects and noted that the issue of defining an optimum postacute rehabilitation program is complex and requires more investigation. Mallinson's findings are interesting in their own right but raise a more fundamental issue. This commentary observes that rehabilitation patients typically use multiple postacute settings, not just 1 setting of care, for the same episode of care. This commentary asks whether we should be examining episode outcomes and not just setting-specific outcomes, especially in the face of bundled payment and value-based payment reforms in the Affordable Care Act.