Literature DB >> 24189316

Interpapillary muscle distance independently affects severity of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction.

Kitae Kim1, Shuichiro Kaji2, Yoshimori An1, Tomohiro Nishino1, Tomoko Tani1, Takeshi Kitai1, Yutaka Furukawa1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Surgical papillary muscle (PM) imbrication has been reported to be effective to relieve leaflet tethering in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). However, the mechanism that contributes to improvement of FMR by shortening the interpapillary muscle distance (IPMD) has not been well investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether IPMD can affect MR severity independently of PM tethering distance in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) using multislice computed tomography.
METHODS: We analyzed volumetric multislice computed tomography images of mitral apparatus in 83 patients with LVD (ejection fraction <50%): 37 patients with FMR and 46 patients without FMR. By using the original software, we assessed the 3-dimensional geometry of mitral apparatus including IPMD, tethering distances, and mitral tenting volume at end-systole. The severity of FMR was assessed using vena contracta (VC) width by 2-dimensional echocardiography.
RESULTS: Posterior and anterior tethering distance and IPMD were increased significantly in patients with FMR than in those without FMR. Patients with IPMD in the highest tertile had a significantly higher degrees of MR (mean ± standard error VC width, 4.5 ± 0.3 mm) compared with patients in the lowest and the middle tertiles, adjusting for PM tethering distance (mean ± standard error VC width, 3.0 ± 0.4 and 2.9 ± 0.3 mm; P < .001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that anteroposterior annular diameter and IPMD were the strongest determinants of FMR severity and mitral tenting volume.
CONCLUSIONS: IPMD, which affects leaflet tethering independently of PM tethering distance, was the major determinant of mitral tenting volume and FMR severity in patients with LVD.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24189316     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  5 in total

Review 1.  Ischemic mitral valve prolapse.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Spadaccio Cristiano; Antonio Nenna; Massimo Chello
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Comparison of mitral competence after mitral repair with papillary muscle approximation versus papillary muscle relocation for functional mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Koji Furukawa; Mitsuhiro Yano; Eisaku Nakamura; Masakazu Matsuyama; Masanori Nishimura; Katsuya Kawagoe; Kunihide Nakamura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Geometric description for the anatomy of the mitral valve: A review.

Authors:  Diana Oliveira; Janaki Srinivasan; Daniel Espino; Keith Buchan; Dana Dawson; Duncan Shepherd
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.921

4.  Secondary mitral regurgitation repair techniques and outcomes: Subannular repair techniques in secondary mitral regurgitation type IIIb.

Authors:  Jonas Pausch; Evaldas Girdauskas; Lenard Conradi; Hermann Reichenspurner
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-09-16

5.  Multimodal image analysis and subvalvular dynamics in ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Ahmed H Aly; Yoshiaki Saito; Wobbe Bouma; James J Pilla; Alison M Pouch; Paul A Yushkevich; Matthew J Gillespie; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-10-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.