Literature DB >> 24188404

Percepts, not acoustic properties, are the units of auditory short-term memory.

Samuel R Mathias1, Katharina von Kriegstein1.   

Abstract

For decades, researchers have sought to understand the organizing principles of auditory and visual short-term memory (STM). Previous work in audition has suggested that there are independent memory stores for different sound features, but the nature of the representations retained within these stores is currently unclear. Do they retain perceptual features, or do they instead retain representations of the sound's specific acoustic properties? In the present study we addressed this question by measuring listeners' abilities to keep one of three acoustic properties (interaural time difference [ITD], interaural level difference [ILD], or frequency) in memory when the target sound was followed by interfering sounds that varied randomly in one of the same properties. Critically, ITD and ILD evoked the same percept (spatial location), despite being acoustically different and having different physiological correlates, whereas frequency evoked a different percept (pitch). The results showed that listeners found it difficult to remember the percept of spatial location when the interfering tones varied either in ITD or ILD, but not when they varied in frequency. The study demonstrates that percepts are the units of auditory STM, and provides testable predictions for future neuroscientific work on both auditory and visual STM.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24188404     DOI: 10.1037/a0034890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  4 in total

1.  Effects of talker continuity and speech rate on auditory working memory.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Lim; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Gradual decay and sudden death of short-term memory for pitch.

Authors:  Samuel R Mathias; Leonard Varghese; Christophe Micheyl; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory working memory for objects vs. features.

Authors:  Sabine Joseph; Sukhbinder Kumar; Masud Husain; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  The Item versus the Object in Memory: On the Implausibility of Overwriting As a Mechanism for Forgetting in Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  C Philip Beaman; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.