Literature DB >> 24187909

Computational and theoretical methods for protein folding.

Mario Compiani1, Emidio Capriotti.   

Abstract

A computational approach is essential whenever the complexity of the process under study is such that direct theoretical or experimental approaches are not viable. This is the case for protein folding, for which a significant amount of data are being collected. This paper reports on the essential role of in silico methods and the unprecedented interplay of computational and theoretical approaches, which is a defining point of the interdisciplinary investigations of the protein folding process. Besides giving an overview of the available computational methods and tools, we argue that computation plays not merely an ancillary role but has a more constructive function in that computational work may precede theory and experiments. More precisely, computation can provide the primary conceptual clues to inspire subsequent theoretical and experimental work even in a case where no preexisting evidence or theoretical frameworks are available. This is cogently manifested in the application of machine learning methods to come to grips with the folding dynamics. These close relationships suggested complementing the review of computational methods within the appropriate theoretical context to provide a self-contained outlook of the basic concepts that have converged into a unified description of folding and have grown in a synergic relationship with their computational counterpart. Finally, the advantages and limitations of current computational methodologies are discussed to show how the smart analysis of large amounts of data and the development of more effective algorithms can improve our understanding of protein folding.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24187909     DOI: 10.1021/bi4001529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  12 in total

Review 1.  Tools for Predicting the Functional Impact of Nonsynonymous Genetic Variation.

Authors:  Haiming Tang; Paul D Thomas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evaluating the predictions of the protein stability change upon single amino acid substitutions for the FXN CAGI5 challenge.

Authors:  Castrense Savojardo; Maria Petrosino; Giulia Babbi; Samuele Bovo; Carles Corbi-Verge; Rita Casadio; Piero Fariselli; Lukas Folkman; Aditi Garg; Mostafa Karimi; Panagiotis Katsonis; Philip M Kim; Olivier Lichtarge; Pier Luigi Martelli; Alessandra Pasquo; Debnath Pal; Yang Shen; Alexey V Strokach; Paola Turina; Yaoqi Zhou; Gaia Andreoletti; Steven E Brenner; Roberta Chiaraluce; Valerio Consalvi; Emidio Capriotti
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 3.  Computational methods and resources for the interpretation of genomic variants in cancer.

Authors:  Rui Tian; Malay K Basu; Emidio Capriotti
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Predicting protein stability changes upon single-point mutation: a thorough comparison of the available tools on a new dataset.

Authors:  Corrado Pancotti; Silvia Benevenuta; Giovanni Birolo; Virginia Alberini; Valeria Repetto; Tiziana Sanavia; Emidio Capriotti; Piero Fariselli
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 5.  Looked at life from both sides now.

Authors:  Jillian E Smith; Allisandra K Mowles; Anil K Mehta; David G Lynn
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2014-12-11

6.  Molecular dynamics simulations and docking enable to explore the biophysical factors controlling the yields of engineered nanobodies.

Authors:  Miguel A Soler; Ario de Marco; Sara Fortuna
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Integrating molecular networks with genetic variant interpretation for precision medicine.

Authors:  Emidio Capriotti; Kivilcim Ozturk; Hannah Carter
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2018-12-12

8.  Using Structural Analysis In Silico to Assess the Impact of Missense Variants in MEN1.

Authors:  Richard C Caswell; Martina M Owens; Adam C Gunning; Sian Ellard; Caroline F Wright
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2019-09-27

9.  Start2Fold: a database of hydrogen/deuterium exchange data on protein folding and stability.

Authors:  Rita Pancsa; Mihaly Varadi; Peter Tompa; Wim F Vranken
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Protein stability: a crystallographer's perspective.

Authors:  Marc C Deller; Leopold Kong; Bernhard Rupp
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 1.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.