OBJECTIVE: To assess adolescent PA awareness and investigate associations with biological and psychosocial factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional from November 2005 to July 2007 (ROOTS study). SETTING: Population-based sample recruited via Cambridgeshire and Suffolk schools (UK). PARTICIPANTS: N=799 (44% male, 14.5±0.5 years). MAIN EXPOSURES: Self-rated PA perception, self-reported psychosocial factors, measured anthropometry. OUTCOME MEASURE: PA measured using accelerometry over five days. 'Inactive' defined as accelerometry-measured <60 min/day of at least moderate PA (MVPA). Associations between awareness (agreement between self-rated and accelerometry-measured active/inactive) and potential correlates investigated using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: 70% of adolescents were inactive (81% of girls, 56% of boys, OR(95% CI) 3.41(2.41, 4.82)). 53% of all girls (63% of inactive girls) and 34% of all boys (60% of inactive boys) inaccurately rated themselves as active (over-estimators). Compared to girls accurately describing themselves as inactive (29%), girl over-estimators had lower fat mass (OR(95% CI) 0.84(0.70, 0.99)), higher SES (high vs. low 2.4(1.07, 5.32)), reported more parent-support (1.57(1.12, 2.22)) and better family relationships (0.25(0.09, 0.67)). Amongst boys accurately describing themselves as inactive (22%), over-estimators had lower fat mass (0.86(0.77, 0.96)) reported more peer-support (1.75(1.32, 2.30)) and less teasing (0.75(0.61, 0.92)). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of adolescents believe themselves to be more physically active than they really are. They maybe unaware of potential health risks, and may be unlikely to participate in PA promotion programs. Increasing information of PA health benefits beyond weight control might help encourage behavior change.
OBJECTIVE: To assess adolescent PA awareness and investigate associations with biological and psychosocial factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional from November 2005 to July 2007 (ROOTS study). SETTING: Population-based sample recruited via Cambridgeshire and Suffolk schools (UK). PARTICIPANTS: N=799 (44% male, 14.5±0.5 years). MAIN EXPOSURES: Self-rated PA perception, self-reported psychosocial factors, measured anthropometry. OUTCOME MEASURE: PA measured using accelerometry over five days. 'Inactive' defined as accelerometry-measured <60 min/day of at least moderate PA (MVPA). Associations between awareness (agreement between self-rated and accelerometry-measured active/inactive) and potential correlates investigated using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: 70% of adolescents were inactive (81% of girls, 56% of boys, OR(95% CI) 3.41(2.41, 4.82)). 53% of all girls (63% of inactive girls) and 34% of all boys (60% of inactive boys) inaccurately rated themselves as active (over-estimators). Compared to girls accurately describing themselves as inactive (29%), girl over-estimators had lower fat mass (OR(95% CI) 0.84(0.70, 0.99)), higher SES (high vs. low 2.4(1.07, 5.32)), reported more parent-support (1.57(1.12, 2.22)) and better family relationships (0.25(0.09, 0.67)). Amongst boys accurately describing themselves as inactive (22%), over-estimators had lower fat mass (0.86(0.77, 0.96)) reported more peer-support (1.75(1.32, 2.30)) and less teasing (0.75(0.61, 0.92)). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of adolescents believe themselves to be more physically active than they really are. They maybe unaware of potential health risks, and may be unlikely to participate in PA promotion programs. Increasing information of PA health benefits beyond weight control might help encourage behavior change.
Authors: William B Strong; Robert M Malina; Cameron J R Blimkie; Stephen R Daniels; Rodney K Dishman; Bernard Gutin; Albert C Hergenroeder; Aviva Must; Patricia A Nixon; James M Pivarnik; Thomas Rowland; Stewart Trost; François Trudeau Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Clare Watkinson; Esther M F van Sluijs; Stephen Sutton; Theresa Marteau; Simon J Griffin Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Chris J Riddoch; Lars Bo Andersen; Niels Wedderkopp; Maarike Harro; Lena Klasson-Heggebø; Luis B Sardinha; Ashley R Cooper; Ulf Ekelund Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Kirsten Corder; Esther M F van Sluijs; Alison M McMinn; Ulf Ekelund; Aedin Cassidy; Simon J Griffin Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Charlotte L Ridgway; Søren Brage; Stephen J Sharp; Kirsten Corder; Kate L Westgate; Esther M van Sluijs; Ian M Goodyer; Pedro C Hallal; Sigmund A Anderssen; Luis B Sardinha; Lars Bo Andersen; Ulf Ekelund Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Femke De Meester; Delfien Van Dyck; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Benedicte Deforche; James F Sallis; Greet Cardon Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 4.135