Literature DB >> 24187381

Private Information and Insurance Rejections.

Nathaniel Hendren1.   

Abstract

Across a wide set of non-group insurance markets, applicants are rejected based on observable, often high-risk, characteristics. This paper argues that private information, held by the potential applicant pool, explains rejections. I formulate this argument by developing and testing a model in which agents may have private information about their risk. I first derive a new no-trade result that theoretically explains how private information could cause rejections. I then develop a new empirical methodology to test whether this no-trade condition can explain rejections. The methodology uses subjective probability elicitations as noisy measures of agents beliefs. I apply this approach to three non-group markets: long-term care, disability, and life insurance. Consistent with the predictions of the theory, in all three settings I find significant amounts of private information held by those who would be rejected; I find generally more private information for those who would be rejected relative to those who can purchase insurance; and I show it is enough private information to explain a complete absence of trade for those who would be rejected. The results suggest private information prevents the existence of large segments of these three major insurance markets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse Selection; Insurance; Private Information

Year:  2013        PMID: 24187381      PMCID: PMC3812958          DOI: 10.3982/ECTA10931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Econometrica        ISSN: 0012-9682            Impact factor:   5.844


  5 in total

1.  Optimal Mandates and The Welfare Cost of Asymmetric Information: Evidence from The U.K. Annuity Market.

Authors:  Liran Einav; Amy Finkelstein; Paul Schrimpf
Journal:  Econometrica       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 5.844

2.  Beyond Testing: Empirical Models of Insurance Markets.

Authors:  Liran Einav; Amy Finkelstein; Jonathan Levin
Journal:  Annu Rev Econom       Date:  2010

3.  Subjective Probabilities in Household Surveys.

Authors:  Michael D Hurd
Journal:  Annu Rev Econom       Date:  2009-06-01

4.  Multiple Dimensions of Private Information: Evidence from the Long-Term Care Insurance Market.

Authors:  Amy Finkelstein; Kathleen McGarry
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  2006-09-01

5.  Preference Heterogeneity and Insurance Markets: Explaining a Puzzle of Insurance.

Authors:  David M Cutler; Amy Finkelstein; Kathleen McGarry
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  2008-05
  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  The Impact of Policy Incentives on Long-Term Care Insurance and Medicaid Costs: Does Underwriting Matter?

Authors:  Portia Y Cornell; David C Grabowski
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  HOW MUCH FAVORABLE SELECTION IS LEFT IN MEDICARE ADVANTAGE?

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; Mary Price; J Michael McWilliams; John Hsu; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Am J Health Econ       Date:  2015

3.  Advantageous Selection, Moral Hazard, and Insurer Sorting on Risk in the U.S. Automobile Insurance Market.

Authors:  Frank A Sloan; Patricia A Robinson; Lindsey M Eldred
Journal:  J Risk Insur       Date:  2016-11-28

4.  Medical Underwriting In Long-Term Care Insurance: Market Conditions Limit Options For Higher-Risk Consumers.

Authors:  Portia Y Cornell; David C Grabowski; Marc Cohen; Xiaomei Shi; David G Stevenson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Effects of a Workplace Wellness Program on Employee Health, Health Beliefs, and Medical Use: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Julian Reif; David Chan; Damon Jones; Laura Payne; David Molitor
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Did COVID-19 change life insurance offerings?

Authors:  Timothy F Harris; Aaron Yelowitz; Charles Courtemanche
Journal:  J Risk Insur       Date:  2021-06-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.