Literature DB >> 24186910

Continuous and routine EEG in intensive care: utilization and outcomes, United States 2005-2009.

John P Ney1, David N van der Goes, Marc R Nuwer, Lonnie Nelson, Matthew A Eccher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of intensive care unit continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring on inpatient mortality, hospital charges, and length of stay.
METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, a dataset representing 20% of inpatient discharges in nonfederal US hospitals. Adult discharge records reporting mechanical ventilation and EEG (routine EEG or cEEG) were included. cEEG was compared with routine EEG alone in association with the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes of total hospital charges and length of stay. Demographics, hospital characteristics, and medical comorbidity were used for multivariate adjustments of the primary and secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 40,945 patient discharges in the weighted sample met inclusion criteria, of which 5,949 had reported cEEG. Mechanically ventilated patients receiving cEEG were younger than routine EEG patients (56 vs 61 years; p < 0.001). There was no difference in the 2 groups in income or medical comorbidities. cEEG was significantly associated with lower in-hospital mortality in both univariate (odds ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.64; p < 0.001) and multivariate (odds ratio = 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.76; p < 0.001) analyses. There was no significant difference in costs or length of stay for patients who received cEEG relative to those receiving only routine EEG. Sensitivity analysis showed that adjusting for diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) for any neurologic diagnoses, DRGs for neurologic procedures, and specific DRGs for epilepsy/convulsions did not substantially alter the association of cEEG with reduced inpatient mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: cEEG is favorably associated with inpatient survival in mechanically ventilated patients, without adding significant charges to the hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24186910      PMCID: PMC3854828          DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000436948.93399.2a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  28 in total

1.  Can't miss: conquer any number task by making important statistics simple. Part 6. Tests of statistical significance (z test statistic, rejecting the null hypothesis, p value), t test, z test for proportions, statistical significance versus meaningful difference.

Authors:  John P Hansen
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.095

2.  Brain monitoring: the next frontier of ICU monitoring.

Authors:  Lawrence J Hirsch
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 3.  Electroencephalograms and evoked potentials. Monitoring cerebral function in the neurosurgical intensive care unit.

Authors:  M R Nuwer
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States.

Authors:  R Andersen; J F Newman
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc       Date:  1973

Review 6.  Neurophysiologic monitoring in the neuroscience intensive care unit.

Authors:  K G Jordan
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  Diagnostic yield of electroencephalography in the medical and surgical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Hooman Kamel; John P Betjemann; Babak B Navi; Manu Hegde; Karl Meisel; Vanja C Douglas; S Andrew Josephson
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Continuous EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit: early findings and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  P M Vespa; V Nenov; M R Nuwer
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.177

9.  Early detection of vasospasm after acute subarachnoid hemorrhage using continuous EEG ICU monitoring.

Authors:  P M Vespa; M R Nuwer; C Juhász; M Alexander; V Nenov; N Martin; D P Becker
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-12

Review 10.  Detection of electrographic seizures with continuous EEG monitoring in critically ill patients.

Authors:  J Claassen; S A Mayer; R G Kowalski; R G Emerson; L J Hirsch
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-05-25       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  36 in total

1.  Periodic Assessment of the Use of Continuous EEG Monitoring.

Authors:  David Spencer
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 7.500

2.  Continuous EEG is associated with favorable hospitalization outcomes for critically ill patients.

Authors:  Chloe E Hill; Leah J Blank; Dylan Thibault; Kathryn A Davis; Nabila Dahodwala; Brian Litt; Allison W Willis
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  EEG utilization in the medical/surgical ICU: a single centre prospective observational study.

Authors:  Andrea Park; J Gordon Boyd
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Weak supervision as an efficient approach for automated seizure detection in electroencephalography.

Authors:  Khaled Saab; Jared Dunnmon; Daniel Rubin; Christopher Lee-Messer; Christopher Ré
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-04-20

5.  cEEG electrode-related pressure ulcers in acutely hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Lidia M V R Moura; Thiago S Carneiro; David Kwasnik; Valdery F Moura; Christine S Blodgett; Joseph Cohen; Mary McKenna Guanci; Daniel B Hoch; John Hsu; Andrew J Cole; M Brandon Westover
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2017-02

6.  It HELPS 2NO When to Stop Continuous EEG Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Aatif M Husain
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 7.500

7.  Use of EEG in critically ill children and neonates in the United States of America.

Authors:  Marina Gaínza-Lein; Iván Sánchez Fernández; Tobias Loddenkemper
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Consensus statement on continuous EEG in critically ill adults and children, part I: indications.

Authors:  Susan T Herman; Nicholas S Abend; Thomas P Bleck; Kevin E Chapman; Frank W Drislane; Ronald G Emerson; Elizabeth E Gerard; Cecil D Hahn; Aatif M Husain; Peter W Kaplan; Suzette M LaRoche; Marc R Nuwer; Mark Quigg; James J Riviello; Sarah E Schmitt; Liberty A Simmons; Tammy N Tsuchida; Lawrence J Hirsch
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 9.  Prognostic Value of EEG in Patients after Cardiac Arrest-An Updated Review.

Authors:  Wolfgang Muhlhofer; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 5.081

10.  Assessment of the Validity of the 2HELPS2B Score for Inpatient Seizure Risk Prediction.

Authors:  Aaron F Struck; Mohammad Tabaeizadeh; Sarah E Schmitt; Andres Rodriguez Ruiz; Christa B Swisher; Thanujaa Subramaniam; Christian Hernandez; Safa Kaleem; Hiba A Haider; Abbas Fodé Cissé; Monica B Dhakar; Lawrence J Hirsch; Eric S Rosenthal; Sahar F Zafar; Nicholas Gaspard; M Brandon Westover
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 18.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.