Literature DB >> 24186137

High throughput molecular profiling reveals differential mutation patterns in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas arising in chronic advanced liver diseases.

Sejin Jang1, Sung-Min Chun1, Seoung-Mo Hong2, Chang Ohk Sung2, Hosub Park2, Hyo Jeong Kang2, Kyu-pyo Kim3, Young Joo Lee4, Eunsil Yu1.   

Abstract

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas occur mostly in the normal liver but they also arise in chronic advanced liver diseases. However, genetic differences between two groups have yet to be examined. High throughput mass spectrometry-based platform was used to interrogate mutations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and to compare the mutation profiles between 43 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas with normal liver and 38 with chronic advanced liver diseases. Forty seven mutations in 11 genes were identified in 38 of 81 cases (46.9%). The most commonly mutated gene was KRAS (11/81, 13.6%), followed by MLH1 (7/81, 8.6%), NRAS (7/81, 8.6%), GNAS (6/81, 7.4%), and EGFR (6/81, 7.4%). BRAF, APC, PIK3CA, CDKN2A, PTEN, and TP53 mutations were found with less than 5%. Overall mutation rate of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas with chronic advanced liver disease (15/38, 39.5%, 95% confidence interval: 23.9-55.0) was lower than that of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas with normal liver (23/43, 53.5%, 95% confidence interval: 38.5-68.3). Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas with chronic advanced liver disease showed higher EGFR mutation rate (5/38, 13.2% vs 1/43, 2.3%) and lower mutation rates of KRAS (3/38, 7.9% vs 8/43, 18.6%), MLH1 (2/38, 5.3% vs 5/43, 11.6%), and GNAS (1/38, 2.6% vs 5/43, 11.6%), compared with those in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas with normal liver. Mutations in PIK3CA, PTEN, CDKN2A, and TP53 were harbored only in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas with normal liver. KRAS (P=0.0075) or GNAS mutations (P=0.0256) were associated with poor overall survival in all patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Differential mutation patterns of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas with chronic advanced liver disease suggest different cholangiocarcinogenesis depending upon the predisposing factors, and support that different strategy for targeted therapy should be applied in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma subtypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24186137     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  16 in total

1.  Molecular profiling of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Juan Putra; Francine B de Abreu; Jason D Peterson; J Marc Pipas; Kabir Mody; Christopher I Amos; Gregory J Tsongalis; Arief A Suriawinata
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.362

Review 2.  Immunotherapeutic Approaches to Biliary Cancer.

Authors:  Urvi A Shah; Amara G Nandikolla; Lakshmi Rajdev
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-07

Review 3.  Molecular diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroaki Haga; Tushar Patel
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 7.027

Review 4.  Genetic profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its clinical implication in targeted therapy.

Authors:  Diyang Xie; Zhenggang Ren; Jia Fan; Qiang Gao
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 5.  The potential role of comprehensive genomic profiling to guide targeted therapy for patients with biliary cancer.

Authors:  Hwajeong Lee; Jeffrey S Ross
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 6.  Precision medicine in cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Antonio Pellino; Fotios Loupakis; Massimiliano Cadamuro; Vincenzo Dadduzio; Matteo Fassan; Maria Guido; Umberto Cillo; Stefano Indraccolo; Luca Fabris
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-07-12

Review 7.  Genomic Profiling of Biliary Tract Cancers and Implications for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Apurva Jain; Lawrence N Kwong; Milind Javle
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-11

Review 8.  An Omics Perspective on Molecular Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapeutics of Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Pattaya Seeree; Phorutai Pearngam; Supeecha Kumkate; Tavan Janvilisri
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 9.  Genetic heterogeneity in cholangiocarcinoma: a major challenge for targeted therapies.

Authors:  Giovanni Brandi; Andrea Farioli; Annalisa Astolfi; Guido Biasco; Simona Tavolari
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-06-20

10.  Expression and activation of EGFR and STAT3 during the multistage carcinogenesis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma induced by 3'-methyl-4 dimethylaminoazobenzene in rats.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Lianhong Li; Xingwu Yang; Bo Wang; Jinyao Zhao; Shilun Lu; Xiaotang Yu
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 1.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.