Literature DB >> 24185465

A comparison of bovine bone and hydroxyapatite scaffolds during initial bone regeneration: an in vitro evaluation.

Filiberto Mastrangelo1, Raimondo Quaresima, Alfredo Grilli, Lucia Tettamanti, Raffaele Vinci, Gilberto Sammartino, Stefano Tetè, Enrico Gherlone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the different behavior of 3-dimensional biomaterial scaffolds-Bovine Bone (BB; Bio-Oss) and Hydroxyapatite (HA; ENGIpore)-during initial bone healing and development.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human dental papilla stem cells (hDPaSCs) were selected with FACsorter cytofluorimetric analysis, cultured with osteogenic medium, and analyzed with Alizarin red stained after differentiation. The obtained osteoblast-like cells (OCs) were cultured with BB and HA. alkaline phosphatase (ALP), OC, MEPE, and runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) expression markers were investigated performing Western blot and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. After 40 days, samples were analyzed by light and electron microscopy.
RESULTS: All the samples showed high in vitro biocompatibility and qualitative differences of OCs adhesion. RT-PCR and Western blot data exhibited similar marker rate, but ALP, OC, MEPE, and RUNX2expression, during initial healing and bone regeneration phase, was higher and faster in human dental papilla onto BB than in HA scaffolds. In biomaterials growth, RUNX2 seems to play an important role as a key regulator in human OCs from dental papilla bone development.
CONCLUSION: Different surface BB scaffold characteristics seem to play a critical role in OCs differentiation showing different time of bone regeneration morphological characteristics as well as higher and faster levels of all observed markers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24185465     DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182a69858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implant Dent        ISSN: 1056-6163            Impact factor:   2.454


  7 in total

1.  Applications of biomaterials for bone augmentation of jaws: clinical outcomes and in vitro studies.

Authors:  L Tettamanti; M Andreasi Bassi; G Trapella; V Candotto; A Tagliabue
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-04-10

2.  Genetic susceptibility and periodontal disease: a retrospective study on a large italian sample.

Authors:  L Tettamanti; R M Gaudio; A Iapichino; D Mucchi; A Tagliabue
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-04-10

3.  Efficacy of a new coating of implant-abutment connections in reducing bacterial loading: an in vitro study.

Authors:  D Lauritano; C A Bignozzi; D Pazzi; F Cura; F Carinci
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-04-10

4.  Prevalence of periodontal pathogens among italian patients with chronic periodontitis: a retrospective study on 2992 patients.

Authors:  L Tettamanti; R M Gaudio; F Cura; D Mucchi; N Illuzzi; A Tagliabue
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-04-10

Review 5.  Basic concepts regarding fracture healing and the current options and future directions in managing bone fractures.

Authors:  Amin Bigham-Sadegh; Ahmad Oryan
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Application of tissue-engineered bone grafts for alveolar cleft osteoplasty in a rodent model.

Authors:  Paula Korn; Maria Hauptstock; Ursula Range; Christiane Kunert-Keil; Winnie Pradel; Günter Lauer; Matthias C Schulz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Skeletal microenvironment system utilising bovine bone scaffold co-cultured with human osteoblasts and osteoclast-like cells.

Authors:  James Jam Jolly; Nur Farhana Mohd Fozi; Kok-Yong Chin; Sok Kuan Wong; Kien Hui Chua; Ekram Alias; Nur Sabariah Adnan; Soelaiman Ima-Nirwana
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 2.447

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.