Literature DB >> 24185151

Ethnically diverse patients' perceptions of clinician computer use in a safety-net clinic.

Neda Ratanawongsa, Jennifer L Barton, Dean Schillinger, Edward H Yelin, Jennifer E Hettema, Paula J Lum.   

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR) implementation may affect patient-clinician communication for diverse safety-net populations. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of English-, Spanish-, and Cantonese-speaking patients in a public hospital clinic with a basic EHR. We examined multivariate associations of patient race/ethnicity, language, and education with perceptions of primary-care provider (PCP) computer use. Among 399 respondents, 25% had less than a high school education, 22% preferred Spanish, and 17% Cantonese. Asian (AOR 3.1), non-English-speakers (AOR 3.6) were more likely to report that PCPs used the computer half or more of the visit. Asians were more likely to report that computers helped PCPs remember patient concerns (AOR 5.6). Non-English-speakers had lower odds of reporting that PCPs listened less carefully to them because of computers (AOR 0.3). Patients at risk for communication barriers may perceive advantages of PCP computer use. Safety-net clinics should consider EHR impact on communication disparities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24185151      PMCID: PMC4554529          DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2013.0188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved        ISSN: 1049-2089


  32 in total

1.  Practice profile. A safety-net system gains efficiencies through 'eReferrals' to specialists.

Authors:  Alice Hm Chen; Margot B Kushel; Kevin Grumbach; Hal F Yee
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Meaningful use of electronic health records: the road ahead.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Clinician ratings of interpreter mediated visits in underserved primary care settings with ad hoc, in-person professional, and video conferencing modes.

Authors:  Anna M Nápoles; Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson; Leah S Karliner; Helen O'Brien; Steven E Gregorich; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-02

Review 4.  Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Karen Crotty
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Hypoglycemia is more common among type 2 diabetes patients with limited health literacy: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE).

Authors:  Urmimala Sarkar; Andrew J Karter; Jennifer Y Liu; Howard H Moffet; Nancy E Adler; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care.

Authors:  Randall D Cebul; Thomas E Love; Anil K Jain; Christopher J Hebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Limited English proficiency is a barrier to receipt of advice about physical activity and diet among Hispanics with chronic diseases in the United States.

Authors:  Catalina Lopez-Quintero; Elliot M Berry; Yehuda Neumark
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2009-10

8.  Patient health literacy and patient-physician information exchange during a visit.

Authors:  Hirono Ishikawa; Eiji Yano; Shin Fujimori; Makoto Kinoshita; Toshikazu Yamanouchi; Mayuko Yoshikawa; Yoshihiko Yamazaki; Tamio Teramoto
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Evaluating electronic referrals for specialty care at a public hospital.

Authors:  Judy E Kim-Hwang; Alice Hm Chen; Douglas S Bell; David Guzman; Hal F Yee; Margot B Kushel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Language barriers, physician-patient language concordance, and glycemic control among insured Latinos with diabetes: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE).

Authors:  Alicia Fernandez; Dean Schillinger; E Margaret Warton; Nancy Adler; Howard H Moffet; Yael Schenker; M Victoria Salgado; Ameena Ahmed; Andrew J Karter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  7 in total

1.  Patient Perceptions of Electronic Medical Record Use by Faculty and Resident Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Wei Wei Lee; Maria A Alkureishi; Obioma Ukabiala; Laura Ruth Venable; Samantha S Ngooi; Daina D Staisiunas; Kristen E Wroblewski; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient-Doctor Relationship and Communication: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maria Alcocer Alkureishi; Wei Wei Lee; Maureen Lyons; Valerie G Press; Sara Imam; Akua Nkansah-Amankra; Deb Werner; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Computers in the clinical encounter: a scoping review and thematic analysis.

Authors:  Noah H Crampton; Shmuel Reis; Aviv Shachak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Computer use, language, and literacy in safety net clinic communication.

Authors:  Neda Ratanawongsa; Jennifer L Barton; Courtney R Lyles; Michael Wu; Edward H Yelin; Diana Martinez; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Finding Meaning in Medication Reconciliation Using Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Analysis in Safety Net Primary and Specialty Care.

Authors:  George Yaccoub Matta; Elaine C Khoong; Courtney R Lyles; Dean Schillinger; Neda Ratanawongsa
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2018-05-07

6.  Perspectives of English, Chinese, and Spanish-Speaking Safety-Net Patients on Clinician Computer Use: Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Elaine C Khoong; Roy Cherian; George Y Matta; Courtney R Lyles; Dean Schillinger; Neda Ratanawongsa
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 7.  Clinically Excellent Use of the Electronic Health Record: Review.

Authors:  Leah Wolfe; Margaret Smith Chisolm; Fuad Bohsali
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2018-10-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.