Literature DB >> 24184311

Evaluation of swabs and transport media for the recovery of Yersinia pestis.

Sarah E Gilbert1, Laura J Rose2, Michele Howard3, Meranda D Bradley3, Sanjiv Shah4, Erin Silvestri4, Frank W Schaefer4, Judith Noble-Wang3.   

Abstract

The Government Accountability Office report investigating the surface sampling methods used during the 2001 mail contamination with Bacillus anthracis brought to light certain knowledge gaps that existed regarding environmental sampling with biothreat agents. Should a contamination event occur that involves non-spore forming biological select agents, such as Yersinia pestis, surface sample collection and processing protocols specific for these organisms will be needed. Two Y. pestis strains (virulent and avirulent), four swab types (polyester, macrofoam, rayon, and cotton), two pre-moistening solutions, six transport media, three temperatures, two levels of organic load, and four processing methods (vortexing, sonicating, combined sonicating and vortexing, no agitation) were evaluated to determine the conditions that would yield the highest percent of cultivable Y. pestis cells after storage. The optimum pre-moistening agent/transport media combination varied with the Y. pestis strain and swab type. Directly inoculated macrofoam swabs released the highest percent of cells into solution (93.9% recovered by culture) and rayon swabs were considered the second best swab option (77.0% recovered by culture). Storage at 4°C was found to be optimum for all storage times and transport media. In a worst case scenario, where the Y. pestis strain is not known and sample processing and analyses could not occur until 72h after sampling, macrofoam swabs pre-moistened with PBS supplemented with 0.05% Triton X-100 (PBSTX), stored at 4°C in neutralizing buffer (NB) as a transport medium (PBSTX/NB) or pre-moistened with NB and stored in PBSTX as a transport medium (NB/PBSTX), then vortexed 3min in the transport medium, performed significantly better than all other conditions for macrofoam swabs, regardless of strain tested (mean 12 - 72h recovery of 85.9-105.1%, p<0.001). In the same scenario, two combinations of pre-moistening medium/transport medium were found to be optimal for rayon swabs stored at 4°C (p<0.001), then sonicated 3min in the transport medium; PBSTX/PBSTX and NB/PBSTX (mean 12-72h recovery of 83.7-110.1%).
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Recovery; Swab; Transport media; Yersinia pestis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24184311     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Swab Sampling Methods for Norovirus Recovery on Surfaces.

Authors:  Cheonghoon Lee; SungJun Park; Kyuseon Cho; Ju Eun Yoo; Sunghee Lee; GwangPyo Ko
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Evaluation of a New Environmental Sampling Protocol for Detection of Human Norovirus on Inanimate Surfaces.

Authors:  Geun Woo Park; David Lee; Aimee Treffiletti; Mario Hrsak; Jill Shugart; Jan Vinjé
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison of three neutralizing broths for environmental sampling of low levels of Listeria monocytogenes desiccated on stainless steel surfaces and exposed to quaternary ammonium compounds.

Authors:  Fengmin Li; Zhihan Xian; Hee Jin Kwon; Jiyoon Yoo; Laurel Burall; Stuart J Chirtel; Thomas S Hammack; Yi Chen
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.605

4.  Polysaccharide-based liquid storage and transport media for non-refrigerated preservation of bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Janine R Hutchison; Shelby M Brooks; Zachary C Kennedy; Timothy R Pope; Brooke L Deatherage Kaiser; Kristin D Victry; Cynthia L Warner; Kristie L Oxford; Kristin M Omberg; Marvin G Warner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.