Literature DB >> 24184215

Tackling the conformational sampling of larger flexible compounds and macrocycles in pharmacology and drug discovery.

I-Jen Chen1, Nicolas Foloppe.   

Abstract

Computational conformational sampling underpins much of molecular modeling and design in pharmaceutical work. The sampling of smaller drug-like compounds has been an active area of research. However, few studies have tested in details the sampling of larger more flexible compounds, which are also relevant to drug discovery, including therapeutic peptides, macrocycles, and inhibitors of protein-protein interactions. Here, we investigate extensively mainstream conformational sampling methods on three carefully curated compound sets, namely the 'Drug-like', larger 'Flexible', and 'Macrocycle' compounds. These test molecules are chemically diverse with reliable X-ray protein-bound bioactive structures. The compared sampling methods include Stochastic Search and the recent LowModeMD from MOE, all the low-mode based approaches from MacroModel, and MD/LLMOD recently developed for macrocycles. In addition to default settings, key parameters of the sampling protocols were explored. The performance of the computational protocols was assessed via (i) the reproduction of the X-ray bioactive structures, (ii) the size, coverage and diversity of the output conformational ensembles, (iii) the compactness/extendedness of the conformers, and (iv) the ability to locate the global energy minimum. The influence of the stochastic nature of the searches on the results was also examined. Much better results were obtained by adopting search parameters enhanced over the default settings, while maintaining computational tractability. In MOE, the recent LowModeMD emerged as the method of choice. Mixed torsional/low-mode from MacroModel performed as well as LowModeMD, and MD/LLMOD performed well for macrocycles. The low-mode based approaches yielded very encouraging results with the flexible and macrocycle sets. Thus, one can productively tackle the computational conformational search of larger flexible compounds for drug discovery, including macrocycles.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  %BioConf_Rep; %GlobMin_found; 3D; Bioactive structures; Computational chemistry; Conformational sampling; Diel; Drug discovery; Flexible compounds; GB; GUI; Global energy minimum; LLMOD; LMOD; Low-mode; LowModeMD; MD-based simulated annealing followed by large-scale low-mode; MD/LLMOD; MMFF; MOE; MT/LLMOD; MT/LMOD; MW; Macrocycles; Max-Iteration; Merck molecular force field; NRot; NbConfs; OPLS; Oprea number of rotatable bonds; PDB; Rgyr; RotSteps; distance-dependent dielectric; generalized born; graphical user interface; large-scale low-mode; low-mode; maximum number of search iterations per compound; mixed torsional/large-scale low-mode; mixed torsional/low-mode; molecular operating environment; molecular weight; number of conformers; number of moves per rotatable bond; number of rotatable bonds; opr_nrot; optimized potentials for liquid simulations force field; percentage of compounds for which the bioactive structure was reproduced; percentage of compounds for which the global energy minimum was found; protein data bank; radius of gyration; search method combining low-mode moves and molecular dynamics; three-dimensional

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24184215     DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem        ISSN: 0968-0896            Impact factor:   3.641


  23 in total

1.  Conformational ensemble comparison for small molecules in drug discovery.

Authors:  Matthew Habgood
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Exhaustive Conformational Sampling of Complex Fused Ring Macrocycles Using Inverse Kinematics.

Authors:  Evangelos A Coutsias; Katrina W Lexa; Michael J Wester; Sara N Pollock; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Predicting bioactive conformations and binding modes of macrocycles.

Authors:  Andrew Anighoro; Antonio de la Vega de León; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Bioactive focus in conformational ensembles: a pluralistic approach.

Authors:  Matthew Habgood
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Conformation and Permeability: Cyclic Hexapeptide Diastereomers.

Authors:  Satoshi Ono; Matthew R Naylor; Chad E Townsend; Chieko Okumura; Okimasa Okada; R Scott Lokey
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 6.  Understanding and designing head-to-tail cyclic peptides.

Authors:  Diana P Slough; Sean M McHugh; Yu-Shan Lin
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.505

7.  Coupling enhanced sampling of the apo-receptor with template-based ligand conformers selection: performance in pose prediction in the D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Andrea Basciu; Panagiotis I Koukos; Giuliano Malloci; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Attilio V Vargiu
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  Conformational energy range of ligands in protein crystal structures: The difficult quest for accurate understanding.

Authors:  Megan L Peach; Raul E Cachau; Marc C Nicklaus
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.137

9.  Cyclization and Docking Protocol for Cyclic Peptide-Protein Modeling Using HADDOCK2.4.

Authors:  Vicky Charitou; Siri C van Keulen; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 6.578

10.  Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Constrained Molecular Dynamics as Gibbs Sampling.

Authors:  Laurentiu Spiridon; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.