Literature DB >> 1834111

Development and validation of an instrument to measure satisfaction of participants at breast screening programmes.

J Cockburn1, D Hill, L Irwig, T De Luise, D Turnbull, P Schofield.   

Abstract

A reliable and valid questionnaire has been developed to measure the satisfaction of participants with service offered at mammography screening programmes. The questionnaire measures five specific aspects: convenience and accessibility, staffs' interpersonal skills, information transfer between staff and client, physical surroundings and perceived technical competence of staff. A general satisfaction dimension was also included. Systematic procedures were followed to ensure that the initial pool of items met the criteria for satisfactory content validity. These procedures included extensive literature review and interviews with participants and service providers. Discriminant validity was assessed by a modified Q-sort procedure, where eight expert judges sorted items into relevant dimensions. The sample for other validity and reliability testing consisted of 584 women who were participants at a breast X-ray programme in Melbourne, Australia. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by considering the correlation of the sum of the subscale scores for each respondent with their score on the general subscale (r = 0.76; P less than 0.001). Multiple regression was used to provide further evidence for the discriminant validity of the proposed subscales and support for the multidimensional conceptualism of satisfaction. Scores on the general satisfaction subscale were used as an outcome variable and other subscale scores were predictor variables. All subscale scores significantly contributed to the prediction of satisfaction, over and above that of other subscales (R2 = 0.59). This indicates that these subscales are measuring distinct dimensions of satisfaction. Cronbach's alpha of each subscale was over 0.50, indicating that the subscales are reliable. The instrument is a potentially useful tool for assessing the quality of care at mammographic screening services and could be used routinely by such services to monitor satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1834111     DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90126-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  8 in total

1.  Measuring satisfaction with mammography results reporting.

Authors:  N C Dolan; J Feinglass; A Priyanath; C Haviley; A V Sorensen; L A Venta
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Mammography: influence of departmental practice and women's characteristics on patient satisfaction: comparison of six departments in Norway.

Authors:  K Løken; S Steine; E Laerum
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-09

3.  Teaching Confirmatory Factor Analysis to Non-Statisticians: A Case Study for Estimating Composite Reliability of Psychometric Instruments.

Authors:  Byron J Gajewski; Yu Jiang; Hung-Wen Yeh; Kimberly Engelman; Cynthia Teel; Won S Choi; K Allen Greiner; Christine Makosky Daley
Journal:  Case Studies Bus Ind Gov Stat       Date:  2014-01

4.  Parental experiences of the newborn hearing screening programme in Wales: a postal questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Rosemary Fox; Sally Minchom
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Assessment of mammography experiences and satisfaction among American Indian/Alaska Native women.

Authors:  Florence M Ndikum-Moffor; Stacy Braiuca; Christine Makosky Daley; Byron J Gajewski; Kimberly K Engelman
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec

6.  An assessment of American Indian women's mammography experiences.

Authors:  Kimberly K Engelman; Christine M Daley; Byron J Gajewski; Florence Ndikum-Moffor; Babalola Faseru; Stacy Braiuca; Stephanie Joseph; Edward F Ellerbeck; K Allen Greiner
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Development and validation of an instrument assessing women's satisfaction with screening mammography in an organized breast cancer screening program.

Authors:  Isabelle Bairati; Stéphane Turcotte; Geneviève Doray; France Belleau; Louise Grégoire
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Psychosocial effects of whole-body MRI screening in adult high-risk pathogenic TP53 mutation carriers: a case-controlled study (SIGNIFY).

Authors:  Elizabeth K Bancroft; Sibel Saya; Emma Brown; Sarah Thomas; Natalie Taylor; Jeanette Rothwell; Jennifer Pope; Anthony Chamberlain; Elizabeth Page; Sarah Benafif; Helen Hanson; Alexander Dias; Christos Mikropoulos; Louise Izatt; Lucy Side; Lisa Walker; Alan Donaldson; Jackie A Cook; Julian Barwell; Vicki Wiles; Lauren Limb; Diana M Eccles; Martin O Leach; Susan Shanley; Fiona J Gilbert; David Gallagher; Balashanmugam Rajashanker; Richard W Whitehouse; Dow-Mu Koh; S Aslam Sohaib; D Gareth Evans; Rosalind A Eeles; Leslie G Walker
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 6.318

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.