Literature DB >> 24182607

Economic evaluation of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.

José Cruzado1, Fernando I Sánchez, José María Abellán, Francisco Pérez-Riquelme, Fernando Carballo.   

Abstract

Because of its incidence and mortality colorectal cancer represents a serious public health issue in industrial countries. In order to reduce its social impact a number of screening strategies have been implemented, which allow an early diagnosis and treatment. These basically include faecal tests and studies that directly explore the colon and rectum. No strategy, whether alone or combined, has proven definitively more effective than the rest, but any such strategy is better than no screening at all. Selecting the most efficient strategy for inclusion in a population-wide program is an uncertain choice. Here we review the evidence available on the various economic evaluations, and conclude that no single method has been clearly identified as most cost-effective; further research in this setting is needed once common economic evaluation standards are established in order to alleviate the methodological heterogeneity prevailing in study results.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal neoplasm; Cost-effectiveness; Cost–utility analysis; Mass screening

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24182607     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1521-6918            Impact factor:   3.043


  6 in total

1.  The impact of stratifying by family history in colorectal cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Simon Lucas Goede; Linda Rabeneck; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Ann G Zauber; Lawrence F Paszat; Jeffrey S Hoch; Jean H E Yong; Frank van Hees; Jill Tinmouth; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Colorectal cancer screening: tests, strategies, and perspectives.

Authors:  Fabrizio Stracci; Manuel Zorzi; Grazia Grazzini
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2014-10-27

Review 3.  Cancer prevention: state of the art and future prospects.

Authors:  I Valle; D Tramalloni; N L Bragazzi
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2015-06-10

4.  Risk Model for Colorectal Cancer in Spanish Population Using Environmental and Genetic Factors: Results from the MCC-Spain study.

Authors:  Gemma Ibáñez-Sanz; Anna Díez-Villanueva; M Henar Alonso; Francisco Rodríguez-Moranta; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Mariona Bustamante; Vicente Martin; Javier Llorca; Pilar Amiano; Eva Ardanaz; Adonina Tardón; Jose J Jiménez-Moleón; Rosana Peiró; Juan Alguacil; Carmen Navarro; Elisabet Guinó; Gemma Binefa; Pablo Fernández-Navarro; Anna Espinosa; Verónica Dávila-Batista; Antonio José Molina; Camilo Palazuelos; Gemma Castaño-Vinyals; Nuria Aragonés; Manolis Kogevinas; Marina Pollán; Victor Moreno
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Initial guidelines for colorectal cancer screening in Saudi Arabia: a beginning.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.526

6.  Effects of cognitive behavior therapy combined with Baduanjin in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Zheng-Gen Lin; Ren-Dong Li; Fu-Lu Ai; Song Li; Xin-An Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-01-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.