BACKGROUND: Two sibling members of the Anopheles gambiae species complex display notable differences in female blood meal preferences. An. gambiae s.s. has a well-documented preference for feeding upon human hosts, whereas An. quadriannulatus feeds on vertebrate/mammalian hosts, with only opportunistic feeding upon humans. Because mosquito host-seeking behaviors are largely driven by the sensory modality of olfaction, we hypothesized that hallmarks of these divergent host seeking phenotypes will be in evidence within the transcriptome profiles of the antennae, the mosquito's principal chemosensory appendage. RESULTS: To test this hypothesis, we have sequenced antennal mRNA of non-bloodfed females from each species and observed a number of distinct quantitative and qualitative differences in their chemosensory gene repertoires. In both species, these gene families show higher rates of sequence polymorphisms than the overall rates in their respective transcriptomes, with potentially important divergences between the two species. Moreover, quantitative differences in odorant receptor transcript abundances have been used to model potential distinctions in volatile odor receptivity between the two sibling species of anophelines. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that the anthropophagic behavior of An. gambiae s.s. reflects the differential distribution of olfactory receptors in the antenna, likely resulting from a co-option and refinement of molecular components common to both species. This study improves our understanding of the molecular evolution of chemoreceptors in closely related anophelines and suggests possible mechanisms that underlie the behavioral distinctions in host seeking that, in part, account for the differential vectorial capacity of these mosquitoes.
BACKGROUND: Two sibling members of the Anopheles gambiae species complex display notable differences in female blood meal preferences. An. gambiae s.s. has a well-documented preference for feeding upon human hosts, whereas An. quadriannulatus feeds on vertebrate/mammalian hosts, with only opportunistic feeding upon humans. Because mosquito host-seeking behaviors are largely driven by the sensory modality of olfaction, we hypothesized that hallmarks of these divergent host seeking phenotypes will be in evidence within the transcriptome profiles of the antennae, the mosquito's principal chemosensory appendage. RESULTS: To test this hypothesis, we have sequenced antennal mRNA of non-bloodfed females from each species and observed a number of distinct quantitative and qualitative differences in their chemosensory gene repertoires. In both species, these gene families show higher rates of sequence polymorphisms than the overall rates in their respective transcriptomes, with potentially important divergences between the two species. Moreover, quantitative differences in odorant receptor transcript abundances have been used to model potential distinctions in volatile odor receptivity between the two sibling species of anophelines. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that the anthropophagic behavior of An. gambiae s.s. reflects the differential distribution of olfactory receptors in the antenna, likely resulting from a co-option and refinement of molecular components common to both species. This study improves our understanding of the molecular evolution of chemoreceptors in closely related anophelines and suggests possible mechanisms that underlie the behavioral distinctions in host seeking that, in part, account for the differential vectorial capacity of these mosquitoes.
Authors: Chao Liu; R Jason Pitts; Jonathan D Bohbot; Patrick L Jones; Guirong Wang; Laurence J Zwiebel Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2010-08-31 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Daniel E Neafsey; Robert M Waterhouse; Mohammad R Abai; Sergey S Aganezov; Max A Alekseyev; James E Allen; James Amon; Bruno Arcà; Peter Arensburger; Gleb Artemov; Lauren A Assour; Hamidreza Basseri; Aaron Berlin; Bruce W Birren; Stephanie A Blandin; Andrew I Brockman; Thomas R Burkot; Austin Burt; Clara S Chan; Cedric Chauve; Joanna C Chiu; Mikkel Christensen; Carlo Costantini; Victoria L M Davidson; Elena Deligianni; Tania Dottorini; Vicky Dritsou; Stacey B Gabriel; Wamdaogo M Guelbeogo; Andrew B Hall; Mira V Han; Thaung Hlaing; Daniel S T Hughes; Adam M Jenkins; Xiaofang Jiang; Irwin Jungreis; Evdoxia G Kakani; Maryam Kamali; Petri Kemppainen; Ryan C Kennedy; Ioannis K Kirmitzoglou; Lizette L Koekemoer; Njoroge Laban; Nicholas Langridge; Mara K N Lawniczak; Manolis Lirakis; Neil F Lobo; Ernesto Lowy; Robert M MacCallum; Chunhong Mao; Gareth Maslen; Charles Mbogo; Jenny McCarthy; Kristin Michel; Sara N Mitchell; Wendy Moore; Katherine A Murphy; Anastasia N Naumenko; Tony Nolan; Eva M Novoa; Samantha O'Loughlin; Chioma Oringanje; Mohammad A Oshaghi; Nazzy Pakpour; Philippos A Papathanos; Ashley N Peery; Michael Povelones; Anil Prakash; David P Price; Ashok Rajaraman; Lisa J Reimer; David C Rinker; Antonis Rokas; Tanya L Russell; N'Fale Sagnon; Maria V Sharakhova; Terrance Shea; Felipe A Simão; Frederic Simard; Michel A Slotman; Pradya Somboon; Vladimir Stegniy; Claudio J Struchiner; Gregg W C Thomas; Marta Tojo; Pantelis Topalis; José M C Tubio; Maria F Unger; John Vontas; Catherine Walton; Craig S Wilding; Judith H Willis; Yi-Chieh Wu; Guiyun Yan; Evgeny M Zdobnov; Xiaofan Zhou; Flaminia Catteruccia; George K Christophides; Frank H Collins; Robert S Cornman; Andrea Crisanti; Martin J Donnelly; Scott J Emrich; Michael C Fontaine; William Gelbart; Matthew W Hahn; Immo A Hansen; Paul I Howell; Fotis C Kafatos; Manolis Kellis; Daniel Lawson; Christos Louis; Shirley Luckhart; Marc A T Muskavitch; José M Ribeiro; Michael A Riehle; Igor V Sharakhov; Zhijian Tu; Laurence J Zwiebel; Nora J Besansky Journal: Science Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Joanna K Konopka; Darya Task; Ali Afify; Joshua Raji; Katelynn Deibel; Sarah Maguire; Randy Lawrence; Christopher J Potter Journal: Chem Senses Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 4.985
Authors: Joshua I Raji; Nadia Melo; John S Castillo; Sheyla Gonzalez; Valeria Saldana; Marcus C Stensmyr; Matthew DeGennaro Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 10.900
Authors: Theresa K Hodges; Luciano V Cosme; Giridhar Athrey; Sharmila Pathikonda; Willem Takken; Michel A Slotman Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2014-12-11 Impact factor: 3.969