Literature DB >> 24180433

Mode of action and human relevance analysis for nuclear receptor-mediated liver toxicity: A case study with phenobarbital as a model constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activator.

Clifford R Elcombe1, Richard C Peffer, Douglas C Wolf, Jason Bailey, Remi Bars, David Bell, Russell C Cattley, Stephen S Ferguson, David Geter, Amber Goetz, Jay I Goodman, Susan Hester, Abigail Jacobs, Curtis J Omiecinski, Rita Schoeny, Wen Xie, Brian G Lake.   

Abstract

The constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and pregnane X receptor (PXR) are important nuclear receptors involved in the regulation of cellular responses from exposure to many xenobiotics and various physiological processes. Phenobarbital (PB) is a non-genotoxic indirect CAR activator, which induces cytochrome P450 (CYP) and other xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes and is known to produce liver foci/tumors in mice and rats. From literature data, a mode of action (MOA) for PB-induced rodent liver tumor formation was developed. A MOA for PXR activators was not established owing to a lack of suitable data. The key events in the PB-induced liver tumor MOA comprise activation of CAR followed by altered gene expression specific to CAR activation, increased cell proliferation, formation of altered hepatic foci and ultimately the development of liver tumors. Associative events in the MOA include altered epigenetic changes, induction of hepatic CYP2B enzymes, liver hypertrophy and decreased apoptosis; with inhibition of gap junctional intercellular communication being an associative event or modulating factor. The MOA was evaluated using the modified Bradford Hill criteria for causality and other possible MOAs were excluded. While PB produces liver tumors in rodents, important species differences were identified including a lack of cell proliferation in cultured human hepatocytes. The MOA for PB-induced rodent liver tumor formation was considered to be qualitatively not plausible for humans. This conclusion is supported by data from a number of epidemiological studies conducted in human populations chronically exposed to PB in which there is no clear evidence for increased liver tumor risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24180433      PMCID: PMC4019974          DOI: 10.3109/10408444.2013.835786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  121 in total

1.  Diethanolamine and phenobarbital produce an altered pattern of methylation in GC-rich regions of DNA in B6C3F1 mouse hepatocytes similar to that resulting from choline deficiency.

Authors:  Ammie N Bachman; Lisa M Kamendulis; Jay I Goodman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Serine 202 regulates the nuclear translocation of constitutive active/androstane receptor.

Authors:  F Hosseinpour; R Moore; M Negishi; T Sueyoshi
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 3.  Drug-related hepatotoxicity.

Authors:  Victor J Navarro; John R Senior
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  PXR and CAR: nuclear receptors which play a pivotal role in drug disposition and chemical toxicity.

Authors:  Lesley A Stanley; Brian C Horsburgh; Jillian Ross; Nico Scheer; C Roland Wolf
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.518

5.  Apoptosis in stages of mouse hepatocarcinogenesis: failure to counterbalance cell proliferation and to account for strain differences in tumor susceptibility.

Authors:  Wilfried Bursch; Monika Chabicovsky; Ute Wastl; Bettina Grasl-Kraupp; Krystina Bukowska; Henryk Taper; Rolf Schulte-Hermann
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  No increase of apoptosis in regressing mouse liver after withdrawal of growth stimuli or food restriction.

Authors:  Wilfried Bursch; Ute Wastl; Karin Hufnagl; Rolf Schulte-Hermann
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Xenobiotic stress induces hepatomegaly and liver tumors via the nuclear receptor constitutive androstane receptor.

Authors:  Wendong Huang; Jun Zhang; Michele Washington; Jun Liu; John M Parant; Guillermina Lozano; David D Moore
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-04-14

Review 8.  Confounders in interpreting pathology for safety and risk assessment.

Authors:  Douglas C Wolf; Peter C Mann
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  Mode of action in relevance of rodent liver tumors to human cancer risk.

Authors:  Michael P Holsapple; Henri C Pitot; Samuel M Cohen; Samuel H Cohen; Alan R Boobis; James E Klaunig; Timothy Pastoor; Vicki L Dellarco; Yvonne P Dragan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  Induction of cytochromes P450.

Authors:  Maurice Dickins
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  46 in total

1.  From the Cover: Three-Dimensional (3D) HepaRG Spheroid Model With Physiologically Relevant Xenobiotic Metabolism Competence and Hepatocyte Functionality for Liver Toxicity Screening.

Authors:  Sreenivasa C Ramaiahgari; Suramya Waidyanatha; Darlene Dixon; Michael J DeVito; Richard S Paules; Stephen S Ferguson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Genome-wide analysis of human constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) transcriptome in wild-type and CAR-knockout HepaRG cells.

Authors:  Daochuan Li; Bryan Mackowiak; Timothy G Brayman; Michael Mitchell; Lei Zhang; Shiew-Mei Huang; Hongbing Wang
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 5.858

3.  A Set of Six Gene Expression Biomarkers Identify Rat Liver Tumorigens in Short-term Assays.

Authors:  J Christopher Corton; Thomas Hill; Jeffrey J Sutherland; James L Stevens; John Rooney
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Dose-response analysis of epigenetic, metabolic, and apical endpoints after short-term exposure to experimental hepatotoxicants.

Authors:  Isabelle R Miousse; Lynea A Murphy; Haixia Lin; Melissa R Schisler; Jinchun Sun; Marie-Cecile G Chalbot; Radhakrishna Sura; Kamin Johnson; Matthew J LeBaron; Ilias G Kavouras; Laura K Schnackenberg; Richard D Beger; Reza J Rasoulpour; Igor Koturbash
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 5.  Chromatin dynamics underlying latent responses to xenobiotics.

Authors:  Jonathan Moggs; Rémi Terranova
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 6.  Small-molecule modulators of the constitutive androstane receptor.

Authors:  Milu T Cherian; Sergio C Chai; Taosheng Chen
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 7.  Case examples of an evaluation of the human relevance of the pyrethroids/pyrethrins-induced liver tumours in rodents based on the mode of action.

Authors:  Tomoya Yamada
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.524

8.  Candidate genes responsible for early key events of phenobarbital-promoted mouse hepatocellular tumorigenesis based on differentiation of regulating genes between wild type mice and humanized chimeric mice.

Authors:  Ayako Ohara; Yasuhiko Takahashi; Miwa Kondo; Yu Okuda; Shuji Takeda; Masahiko Kushida; Kentaro Kobayashi; Kayo Sumida; Tomoya Yamada
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 9.  The Roles of Xenobiotic Receptors: Beyond Chemical Disposition.

Authors:  Bryan Mackowiak; Jessica Hodge; Sydney Stern; Hongbing Wang
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.922

10.  Effect of Gambogenic Acid on Cytochrome P450 1A2, 2B1 and 2E1, and Constitutive Androstane Receptor in Rats.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Xiaozhu Tang; Qianqian Xu; Tao Ge; Daiyin Peng; Weidong Chen
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.